BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Social Media :: Brenda Leyland: Gerry McCann called for example to be made of 'trolls'
Page 4 of 4 • Share
Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
What is going on...?
Is anyone able to bring over a copy of Martin Brunt's latest tweet?
(@skymartinbrunt)
Photobucket is giving me gyp so I can't copy and paste it -
- however, it reads, in double-sized, blackened font :
That was a hoax!
(timed as of 14 hours ago)
Any ideas, anyone as to what this character is up to?
(@skymartinbrunt)
Photobucket is giving me gyp so I can't copy and paste it -
- however, it reads, in double-sized, blackened font :
That was a hoax!
(timed as of 14 hours ago)
Any ideas, anyone as to what this character is up to?
____________________
'Tis strange, but true; for truth is always strange...
(from Lord Byron's 'Don Juan', 1823)
missbeetle- Posts : 985
Activity : 1093
Likes received : 20
Join date : 2014-02-28
Location : New Zealand
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
Martin Brunt @skymartinbrunt
That was a hoax!
Retweets 14
Favorites 4
Wade Willson ann-kristine Sackville comehappy.leave.edgy Nobody Famous Miss Vivien Je Suis Spartacus Turderr Old Holborn
5:42 PM - 20 Mar 2015
Tweet text
Reply to @skymartinbrunt
Old Holborn @Holbornlolz 15h15 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt you could say that. She's still dead though.
11 retweets 14 favorites
Monkey Dibley @realmonkey2 15h15 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt oh so Brenda didn't commit suicide after all. That must be a relief to the kernel of conscience in your heartless mind
4 retweets 9 favorites
manics1 @manics1 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt what was??
0 retweets 0 favorites
Miss Vivien @vivienmiss 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt So you're admitting the McCann "abduction" was a hoax all along.who would have thought.Redemption .
7 retweets 12 favorites
Leonardo @LucidLeonardo 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt Hey douchebag, Me and my brothers are gonna doorstep you tonight. You freakin skuzbucket.
4 retweets 12 favorites
Lynne Mayne @LynneMayne 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt you are a disgrace door stepping a pentioner!
5 retweets 6 favorites
Nobody Famous @Itsaspengthing 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt What a strange comment? Very bad timing. #screengrabbed.
2 retweets 6 favorites
Miss Vivien @vivienmiss 14h14 hours ago
@Itsaspengthing @skymartinbrunt He doesn't give a toss.Brenda was collateral damage.
3 retweets 5 favorites
Nobody Famous @Itsaspengthing 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt What a strange comment to make. Today of all days #BrendaLeyland #mccann pic.twitter.com/60rR57f3jF
4 retweets 3 favorites
Nobody Famous @Itsaspengthing 14h14 hours ago
@vivienmiss @skymartinbrunt So much for being devastated then.
2 retweets 2 favorites
MrsWaspie @MrsWaspie 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt I sincerely hope your a/c has been hacked! #mccann
1 retweet 4 favorites
RETURN OF THE KING @hondo1650 14h14 hours ago
@MrsWaspie @skymartinbrunt suspicious or what? #mccann
1 retweet 1 favorite
MrsWaspie @MrsWaspie 14h14 hours ago
@hondo1650 @skymartinbrunt - sickening is what it is
0 retweets 0 favorites
Miss Vivien @vivienmiss 14h14 hours ago
@Itsaspengthing @skymartinbrunt Crocodile tears.
0 retweets 0 favorites
RETURN OF THE KING @hondo1650 14h14 hours ago
@MrsWaspie @skymartinbrunt isn't it just. All because two fake #mccann parents say they had their child stolen with zero evidence of such
2 retweets 1 favorite
Tony Anderson @ballstony 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt You're a fucking scumbag with a death on your conscience - doubt you have one though you Murdoch rat #UtterCunt
4 retweets 3 favorites
Nobody Famous @Itsaspengthing 14h14 hours ago
@vivienmiss @skymartinbrunt Hoax devastated tears?
1 retweet 0 favorites
Adam @ADZtbh 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt Thought you'd be keeping a low profile today, maybe show some respect to Brenda & her family. Why start now though, eh?
7 retweets 6 favorites
Karen Hughes @Bat_E_Karen 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt What was a hoax?
0 retweets 2 favorites
Miss Vivien @vivienmiss 14h14 hours ago
@Itsaspengthing @skymartinbrunt I hope people boycott sky,i haven't watched Sky news since Brenda I won't ever again either.
0 retweets 7 favorites
Dark Mavis. . . @_DarkMavis 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt if you had any compassion whatsoever you would explain WHY you were acting on a dossier the police were dealing with....
6 retweets 3 favorites
Infidel @tomfranks9 14h14 hours ago
.@skymartinbrunt whatever helps you sleep night.
3 retweets 4 favorites
Dark Mavis. . . @_DarkMavis 14h14 hours ago
Perhaps you could explain what actual 'research' you did regarding the dossier before acting upon it ... ? @skymartinbrunt #McCann
That was a hoax!
Retweets 14
Favorites 4
Wade Willson ann-kristine Sackville comehappy.leave.edgy Nobody Famous Miss Vivien Je Suis Spartacus Turderr Old Holborn
5:42 PM - 20 Mar 2015
Tweet text
Reply to @skymartinbrunt
Old Holborn @Holbornlolz 15h15 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt you could say that. She's still dead though.
11 retweets 14 favorites
Monkey Dibley @realmonkey2 15h15 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt oh so Brenda didn't commit suicide after all. That must be a relief to the kernel of conscience in your heartless mind
4 retweets 9 favorites
manics1 @manics1 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt what was??
0 retweets 0 favorites
Miss Vivien @vivienmiss 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt So you're admitting the McCann "abduction" was a hoax all along.who would have thought.Redemption .
7 retweets 12 favorites
Leonardo @LucidLeonardo 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt Hey douchebag, Me and my brothers are gonna doorstep you tonight. You freakin skuzbucket.
4 retweets 12 favorites
Lynne Mayne @LynneMayne 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt you are a disgrace door stepping a pentioner!
5 retweets 6 favorites
Nobody Famous @Itsaspengthing 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt What a strange comment? Very bad timing. #screengrabbed.
2 retweets 6 favorites
Miss Vivien @vivienmiss 14h14 hours ago
@Itsaspengthing @skymartinbrunt He doesn't give a toss.Brenda was collateral damage.
3 retweets 5 favorites
Nobody Famous @Itsaspengthing 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt What a strange comment to make. Today of all days #BrendaLeyland #mccann pic.twitter.com/60rR57f3jF
4 retweets 3 favorites
Nobody Famous @Itsaspengthing 14h14 hours ago
@vivienmiss @skymartinbrunt So much for being devastated then.
2 retweets 2 favorites
MrsWaspie @MrsWaspie 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt I sincerely hope your a/c has been hacked! #mccann
1 retweet 4 favorites
RETURN OF THE KING @hondo1650 14h14 hours ago
@MrsWaspie @skymartinbrunt suspicious or what? #mccann
1 retweet 1 favorite
MrsWaspie @MrsWaspie 14h14 hours ago
@hondo1650 @skymartinbrunt - sickening is what it is
0 retweets 0 favorites
Miss Vivien @vivienmiss 14h14 hours ago
@Itsaspengthing @skymartinbrunt Crocodile tears.
0 retweets 0 favorites
RETURN OF THE KING @hondo1650 14h14 hours ago
@MrsWaspie @skymartinbrunt isn't it just. All because two fake #mccann parents say they had their child stolen with zero evidence of such
2 retweets 1 favorite
Tony Anderson @ballstony 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt You're a fucking scumbag with a death on your conscience - doubt you have one though you Murdoch rat #UtterCunt
4 retweets 3 favorites
Nobody Famous @Itsaspengthing 14h14 hours ago
@vivienmiss @skymartinbrunt Hoax devastated tears?
1 retweet 0 favorites
Adam @ADZtbh 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt Thought you'd be keeping a low profile today, maybe show some respect to Brenda & her family. Why start now though, eh?
7 retweets 6 favorites
Karen Hughes @Bat_E_Karen 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt What was a hoax?
0 retweets 2 favorites
Miss Vivien @vivienmiss 14h14 hours ago
@Itsaspengthing @skymartinbrunt I hope people boycott sky,i haven't watched Sky news since Brenda I won't ever again either.
0 retweets 7 favorites
Dark Mavis. . . @_DarkMavis 14h14 hours ago
@skymartinbrunt if you had any compassion whatsoever you would explain WHY you were acting on a dossier the police were dealing with....
6 retweets 3 favorites
Infidel @tomfranks9 14h14 hours ago
.@skymartinbrunt whatever helps you sleep night.
3 retweets 4 favorites
Dark Mavis. . . @_DarkMavis 14h14 hours ago
Perhaps you could explain what actual 'research' you did regarding the dossier before acting upon it ... ? @skymartinbrunt #McCann
unchained melody- Posts : 161
Activity : 167
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2013-10-16
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
Does anyone know:
If there is a minuted FULL 'report' of the inquest, accessable by the 'public'?
I'm 'interested' in the police 'evidence' given.
Did the police 'produce', in court, the actual 'equipment' BL 'supposedly' used?
The 'helium' cannisters, the alcohol 'bottle/s' and depressent 'pill' boxes?
All these 'items' WOULD have been 'bagged up' as exhibits 1, 2, 3 etc.,
AND 'photo's' taken.
SOC 'evidence'
Who has 'them' and will the 'photo's' (accidentally 'appear'?) ever be, 'accidentally', 'published' in a UK Madia news 'outlet'? (papers/tv)
MB/Sky News 'exclusiff'?
eta: I still want to 'know' how MB got hold of, got access to, an OFFICIAL police 'dossier' which was subject to being 'investigated' by police.
SFTHM: Sky News reporter Martin Brunt has told the Brenda Leyland inquest that he traced her from a police dossier.......
LP or MET/OG?
If there is a minuted FULL 'report' of the inquest, accessable by the 'public'?
I'm 'interested' in the police 'evidence' given.
Did the police 'produce', in court, the actual 'equipment' BL 'supposedly' used?
The 'helium' cannisters, the alcohol 'bottle/s' and depressent 'pill' boxes?
All these 'items' WOULD have been 'bagged up' as exhibits 1, 2, 3 etc.,
AND 'photo's' taken.
SOC 'evidence'
Who has 'them' and will the 'photo's' (accidentally 'appear'?) ever be, 'accidentally', 'published' in a UK Madia news 'outlet'? (papers/tv)
MB/Sky News 'exclusiff'?
eta: I still want to 'know' how MB got hold of, got access to, an OFFICIAL police 'dossier' which was subject to being 'investigated' by police.
SFTHM: Sky News reporter Martin Brunt has told the Brenda Leyland inquest that he traced her from a police dossier.......
LP or MET/OG?
jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
jeanmonroe wrote:Does anyone know:
If there is a minuted FULL 'report' of the inquest, accessable by the 'public'?
Not sure about the accessibility of the minuted transcripts to the Public. If it is, you may have to apply and pay for it.
What is shocking is the lack of depth of the inquest. It was a quickie inquest and not a comprehensive one that requires details from Police. Very strange, given that Gerry's call to make example of them "trolls" and given the circumstances of her death. No one knows if plastic bag was found on her, the level of the helium inhalation, why the canisters and other physical evidence were not shown in court etc.
Odd, all very ODD.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
aiyoyo wrote:jeanmonroe wrote:Does anyone know:
If there is a minuted FULL 'report' of the inquest, accessable by the 'public'?
Not sure about the accessibility of the minuted transcripts to the Public. If it is, you may have to apply and pay for it.
What is shocking is the lack of depth of the inquest. It was a quickie inquest and not a comprehensive one that requires details from Police. Very strange, given that Gerry's call to make example of them "trolls" and given the circumstances of her death. No one knows if plastic bag was found on her, the level of the helium inhalation, why the canisters and other physical evidence were not shown in court etc.
Odd, all very ODD.
Let's hope 'someone' had 'button hole' 'pen/watch' cam 'running'
Sky News 'love' using 'them' for their 'exclusive' UNDERCOVER exposures, don't they?
jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
Just apprised myself of the fact, from google, that :
"Inquests are not permitted to determine blame and the conclusion (verdict) will not identify someone as having criminal or civil liability.
If police charge someone with causing the death, the inquest will not be resumed and the next of kin will be informed of the arrangements made to register the death. This is to avoid two different courts examining the same evidence."
So it would appear this case is just another one within routine procedure for the coroner to preside over and conclude, in order for her to certify death for issuance of death certificate for executor /probate purposes etc.
It is the Police that must inform the coroner if there's a criminal or civil liability for someone to answer or not, before the coroner can proceed. Otherwise if there is a criminal case or civil case to answer the case will have to go to another appropriate court to be tried accordingly . Interesting !
No wonder Brunt and Sky walk away from it.
That being the case, it is the down to BL's family to exercise their prerogative (or not), to lodge a complain to Police about Brunt's criminal act against Brenda Leyland, or to file a suit against Brunt before the evidence against the complaint or charges can be placed in front of different court for testing as appropriate or accordingly.
No wonder the police are giving this a cursory glance only based on surface evidence without looking into it in-depth because there is no indication from her family that they want it looked into in depth.
Bet Brunt must be thankful Brenda Leyland's family seemed magnanimous and didn't pursue to have him prosecuted over her untimely death, which in fact they attributed it to Brunt being the final straw for BL.
"Inquests are not permitted to determine blame and the conclusion (verdict) will not identify someone as having criminal or civil liability.
If police charge someone with causing the death, the inquest will not be resumed and the next of kin will be informed of the arrangements made to register the death. This is to avoid two different courts examining the same evidence."
So it would appear this case is just another one within routine procedure for the coroner to preside over and conclude, in order for her to certify death for issuance of death certificate for executor /probate purposes etc.
It is the Police that must inform the coroner if there's a criminal or civil liability for someone to answer or not, before the coroner can proceed. Otherwise if there is a criminal case or civil case to answer the case will have to go to another appropriate court to be tried accordingly . Interesting !
No wonder Brunt and Sky walk away from it.
That being the case, it is the down to BL's family to exercise their prerogative (or not), to lodge a complain to Police about Brunt's criminal act against Brenda Leyland, or to file a suit against Brunt before the evidence against the complaint or charges can be placed in front of different court for testing as appropriate or accordingly.
No wonder the police are giving this a cursory glance only based on surface evidence without looking into it in-depth because there is no indication from her family that they want it looked into in depth.
Bet Brunt must be thankful Brenda Leyland's family seemed magnanimous and didn't pursue to have him prosecuted over her untimely death, which in fact they attributed it to Brunt being the final straw for BL.
aiyoyo- Posts : 9610
Activity : 10084
Likes received : 326
Join date : 2009-11-28
Very good blog on the Inquest by Blacksmith
A lot of differences of opinion with Blacksmith on here I know, but this is an excellent blog which pulls no punches - note his last line.
http://blacksmithbureau.blogspot.pt/
http://blacksmithbureau.blogspot.pt/
JackieL- Posts : 222
Activity : 236
Likes received : 14
Join date : 2013-02-19
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
jeanmonroe wrote:Does anyone know:
If there is a minuted FULL 'report' of the inquest, accessable by the 'public'?
I'm 'interested' in the police 'evidence' given.
Did the police 'produce', in court, the actual 'equipment' BL 'supposedly' used?
The 'helium' cannisters, the alcohol 'bottle/s' and depressent 'pill' boxes?
All these 'items' WOULD have been 'bagged up' as exhibits 1, 2, 3 etc.,
AND 'photo's' taken.
SOC 'evidence'
Who has 'them' and will the 'photo's' (accidentally 'appear'?) ever be, 'accidentally', 'published' in a UK Madia news 'outlet'? (papers/tv)
MB/Sky News 'exclusiff'?
eta: I still want to 'know' how MB got hold of, got access to, an OFFICIAL police 'dossier' which was subject to being 'investigated' by police.
SFTHM: Sky News reporter Martin Brunt has told the Brenda Leyland inquest that he traced her from a police dossier.......
LP or MET/OG?
jeanmonroe I tweeted Sonia this morning who was present at the inquest and asked her if any evidence such as cans or photos were produced in Court and she replied NO.
Maybe the Coroner did the checking during the last few months but it certainly seemed like a rubber stamp job to me.
I also asked her about the Hoax comment and I got a tweet back and I think it said she thought possibly MB had been hacked. I might been wrong there...funny thing is that tweet hasn't shown up on my system. It's as though it has been filtered out. No DM either.
whatsupdoc- Posts : 601
Activity : 953
Likes received : 320
Join date : 2011-08-04
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
There is a write up here
http://forum4.aimoo.com/madeleinemccanncontroversy/WELCOME-to-HDH-Controversy-Info/Brenda-Leyland-Inquest-NOTES-from-the-Coroners-Court-Friday-Mar-20th-2015-1-2309869.html
It was extremely difficult to hear exactly what was being said at times. The only details I can add are the whole method of death was glossed over by the coroner, with the excuse that as there are no legal limits on the sale of helium she didn't want to give too much information. I like many more, probably, had already searched it after the Daily Star article on 28/02/15.. No evidence pertaining to the scene was offered, or mentioned ie photographs taken at the time etc. The only reference made was by Sgt Taylor, by using his hands to indicate the size of the canisters. I would guess at about 30 - 40cms the size of a domestic fire extinguisher. No mention of a hood or other paraphernalia. Wednesday 1st October was the last time BL emailed her son and BL spoke to MB on the same night. We were not told when she asked her neighbour to look after the cats nor when she checked into the hotel. No date was given for a confirmed last sighting. We were told that she died on 04/10/14.
http://forum4.aimoo.com/madeleinemccanncontroversy/WELCOME-to-HDH-Controversy-Info/Brenda-Leyland-Inquest-NOTES-from-the-Coroners-Court-Friday-Mar-20th-2015-1-2309869.html
It was extremely difficult to hear exactly what was being said at times. The only details I can add are the whole method of death was glossed over by the coroner, with the excuse that as there are no legal limits on the sale of helium she didn't want to give too much information. I like many more, probably, had already searched it after the Daily Star article on 28/02/15.. No evidence pertaining to the scene was offered, or mentioned ie photographs taken at the time etc. The only reference made was by Sgt Taylor, by using his hands to indicate the size of the canisters. I would guess at about 30 - 40cms the size of a domestic fire extinguisher. No mention of a hood or other paraphernalia. Wednesday 1st October was the last time BL emailed her son and BL spoke to MB on the same night. We were not told when she asked her neighbour to look after the cats nor when she checked into the hotel. No date was given for a confirmed last sighting. We were told that she died on 04/10/14.
LG- Posts : 56
Activity : 63
Likes received : 7
Join date : 2014-08-02
L-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun >>> 'BRUNT DEVASTATED'
L-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun's piece on MARTIN BRUNT yesterday, for those who haven't seen it.
As usual, a correct assessment - and an utterly damning verdict on Brunt, SKY News and Rupert Murdoch:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
QUOTE
"Brunt Devastated"
" I was devastated, I still am and the enormity of what's happened will always be with me."
Martin Brunt speaking of the tragic death of Brenda Leyland, the enormity of what has happened will always be with him, he said.
How can the enormity of a death which you played a part, whatever way, however small, not always be with you, unless you are a lowlife?
Brunt I never took for a lowlife, but in the case of Brenda Leyland, he joined the club.
The death of Brenda Leyland it seems will always be with him, not because of the sympathy he has for her loss of life, her family, he is feeling sorry for himself.
He had the opportunity at the inquest yesterday to make, not amends, impossible to do that, but to do the decent thing:
To apologise to the Leyland family, to Brenda's sons for his actions for the enormous part he played in what led to her death.
To offer his sympathy and condolences. To not make it about his feelings, but theirs.
He didn't!
He spoke of his own devastation. Not theirs!
He passed up also the opportunity to do the right thing, and disclose his source, as to who are/is the lowlife with whom he colluded, and who put together the file which he used to threaten Brenda Leyland, just because he and they could.
That Mr Brunt, must have been devastating for the Leyland family to learn that you consider the life of the scum who put this file together of greater value than the life of an innocent person, their loved one?T o know that you were not prepared to do what would have been right and proper for Brenda Leyland her family.
Instead Brunt whinged about his own devastation. How the events will stay with him.
For Brenda Leyland's family, her death remains with them for the rest of their lives. For her son, the young man Ben, who quite clearly loved his mother dearly, his life has been devastated by Brunt's actions. For the rest of this young man's life he has to live a life without her, without his lovely mum. My heart breaks for this young man.
So do not Mr Brunt, seek pity. You are undeserving!
What you did to Brenda Leyland, despicable. What you did not do for her, her family yesterday, just sickening!
Yeah, yeah, these poor journalists, they cannot reveal their sources, or these sources will no longer come forth with information, or as in this case, bring them a file where they wrongly accused Brenda Leyland, of committing crimes against the McCanns, and which Brunt, and Murdoch's Sky acted upon.
One has to ask why?
Brunt knew what he was doing, no question about it. He accepted the job of being the one despatched, to lie in wait, outside the home of Brenda Leyland, and as we now also know from his statement at the inquest, he waited for three hours for his opportunity to do so.
His Special Report was not put together in a day. It was a planned attack on Brenda Leyland by his employers at Sky, together with the vile vigilantes, Jim Gamble, Mitchell and the McCanns for sure would have known of it. For them NOT to have known that the round the clock newsreel of Brenda being attacked by Brunt was to be aired is not believable. For them not to have known about Brunt's Special Report, is too ridiculous for words.
They knew!
Brunt was and is part of Twitter. He knew and knows the score there. He knew that many of the McCann supporters posted vile and threatening twit messages to this lady. He himself, only days before he attacked her, began 'following her' on Twitter.
Brenda Leyland it seems posted a message querying Brunt doing so!
Brunt was up to no good for sure together with the others with whom he was colluding, the scum element of the McCann support.
Brunt is not a stupid man. He knew what he did and what he said to Brenda Leyland was so very wrong. Yet he continued.
He protected the person, on camera, who made the accusations against Brenda Leyland, and still does now.
What we all should be asking is HOW, they, Brunt, Gamble, McCanns, Mitchell, Sky, decided who from the alleged great numbers of persons that we are led to believe are contained in that file, was to be their target and WHY?
Who suggested Brenda Leyland from those they had to choose from?
Lots of questions still remain unanswered, but it looks like. unless a criminal case is brought against Brunt/Sky and the others, we will never know the full extent of their dirty deeds, or why they targeted Brenda Leyland. A woman innocent of any criminal act.
Questionable as to whether the same applies to those responsible for pushing this lady to commit suicide.
Of course we can say that no one could have known she would take her own life. But they ALL, each, and every one of them knew that such reporting by Sky, round the clock, screening the footage of Martin Brunt attack this lady, and followed by his Special Report, would have been enough to cause enormous distress and harm to whomever they chose as their target.
Brunt admitting yesterday that Brenda Leyland made such a comment to him, that she was thinking of this, should have been enough for Brunt to put a stop to this.
But they were all in too deep. They rolled with it.
We must not forget that Brenda Leyland was someone who held strong views about the McCann case, and voiced them. She cared that there should be justice for Madeleine, she was NOT a criminal.
The actions of Sky, Brunt, Gamble, the vile vigilantes, McCanns and Mitchell, their attack on this lady was completely unjustified.
Brunt is no innocent party, absolutely not.
Brunt sold his soul to the devil that is Murdoch, and based on his conduct yesterday he hasn't asked for it back.
Yesterday he continued his assault on Brenda Leyland her family by his non disclosure of information.
What he did to this lady, her family, I hope haunts this man for the rest of his life.
And to remind us, he may have whimpered yesterday felt sorry for himself but his harsh words during his Special Report about an innocent lady, tell us that he had not a jot of sympathy for what he had done to her. From Brunt's Special Report :
Brunt said:
After our initial exchange with Sweepy face she invited us in.
Off Camera she explained more about the anonymous tweets she sends from the heart of this pretty village. She had questions for the McCanns. She believed Twitter was a vehicle for expressing those thoughts.
She will probably never tweet again. She hoped she hadn’t broken the law.
Sweepy Face and the many others whose comments have been recorded may find that Scotland Yard may take a different view.
END
Martin Brunt, what a poor excuse for a decent human being. He showed not one iota of thought or care for this woman what he was doing to her. Now HE wants sympathy?
Brenda hadn't broken the law. Scotland Yard did Not take the same view as Brunt and his cronies.
Brenda Leyland did not discuss online the McCann case again. Brunt and his cruel cronies saw to that, they caused this lady to take her life. As her son Ben stated, Brunt was the final straw. This woman was being attacked, receiving real threats online. Brunt/Sky and the rest waded in!
And it has to be said. The reporting on this is shocking. Brenda Leyland is portrayed as some crazy lady who sat, and just fired off messages about the McCanns.
She was part of a group of many many people who discuss this case on Twitter, her twit messages were part of conversations with many others.
She was not some lone individual, not some nut just firing off messages. She made very valid, intelligent contribution to the discussions. She recognised absolutely that all was not right with this case, with the McCann version (s) of events.
And if truth be told that is the threat she posed the McCanns, like thousands of others, she knew the truth of what happened to little Madeleine has yet to be told.
We've heard an account of the truth by Kate McCann - only an account!
And that just won't cut it!
As to Martin Brunt, he has gotten off lightly. The Inquest is not a criminal trial, and he was informed that no criminal charges would be brought.
Perhaps, who knows, young Ben Leyland might have different ideas as to Brunt's fate!
-----------------------
l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
http://l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com/Brunt_Devastated.html
21st March 2015
As usual, a correct assessment - and an utterly damning verdict on Brunt, SKY News and Rupert Murdoch:
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
QUOTE
"Brunt Devastated"
" I was devastated, I still am and the enormity of what's happened will always be with me."
Martin Brunt speaking of the tragic death of Brenda Leyland, the enormity of what has happened will always be with him, he said.
How can the enormity of a death which you played a part, whatever way, however small, not always be with you, unless you are a lowlife?
Brunt I never took for a lowlife, but in the case of Brenda Leyland, he joined the club.
The death of Brenda Leyland it seems will always be with him, not because of the sympathy he has for her loss of life, her family, he is feeling sorry for himself.
He had the opportunity at the inquest yesterday to make, not amends, impossible to do that, but to do the decent thing:
To apologise to the Leyland family, to Brenda's sons for his actions for the enormous part he played in what led to her death.
To offer his sympathy and condolences. To not make it about his feelings, but theirs.
He didn't!
He spoke of his own devastation. Not theirs!
He passed up also the opportunity to do the right thing, and disclose his source, as to who are/is the lowlife with whom he colluded, and who put together the file which he used to threaten Brenda Leyland, just because he and they could.
That Mr Brunt, must have been devastating for the Leyland family to learn that you consider the life of the scum who put this file together of greater value than the life of an innocent person, their loved one?T o know that you were not prepared to do what would have been right and proper for Brenda Leyland her family.
Instead Brunt whinged about his own devastation. How the events will stay with him.
For Brenda Leyland's family, her death remains with them for the rest of their lives. For her son, the young man Ben, who quite clearly loved his mother dearly, his life has been devastated by Brunt's actions. For the rest of this young man's life he has to live a life without her, without his lovely mum. My heart breaks for this young man.
So do not Mr Brunt, seek pity. You are undeserving!
What you did to Brenda Leyland, despicable. What you did not do for her, her family yesterday, just sickening!
Yeah, yeah, these poor journalists, they cannot reveal their sources, or these sources will no longer come forth with information, or as in this case, bring them a file where they wrongly accused Brenda Leyland, of committing crimes against the McCanns, and which Brunt, and Murdoch's Sky acted upon.
One has to ask why?
Brunt knew what he was doing, no question about it. He accepted the job of being the one despatched, to lie in wait, outside the home of Brenda Leyland, and as we now also know from his statement at the inquest, he waited for three hours for his opportunity to do so.
His Special Report was not put together in a day. It was a planned attack on Brenda Leyland by his employers at Sky, together with the vile vigilantes, Jim Gamble, Mitchell and the McCanns for sure would have known of it. For them NOT to have known that the round the clock newsreel of Brenda being attacked by Brunt was to be aired is not believable. For them not to have known about Brunt's Special Report, is too ridiculous for words.
They knew!
Brunt was and is part of Twitter. He knew and knows the score there. He knew that many of the McCann supporters posted vile and threatening twit messages to this lady. He himself, only days before he attacked her, began 'following her' on Twitter.
Brenda Leyland it seems posted a message querying Brunt doing so!
Brunt was up to no good for sure together with the others with whom he was colluding, the scum element of the McCann support.
Brunt is not a stupid man. He knew what he did and what he said to Brenda Leyland was so very wrong. Yet he continued.
He protected the person, on camera, who made the accusations against Brenda Leyland, and still does now.
What we all should be asking is HOW, they, Brunt, Gamble, McCanns, Mitchell, Sky, decided who from the alleged great numbers of persons that we are led to believe are contained in that file, was to be their target and WHY?
Who suggested Brenda Leyland from those they had to choose from?
Lots of questions still remain unanswered, but it looks like. unless a criminal case is brought against Brunt/Sky and the others, we will never know the full extent of their dirty deeds, or why they targeted Brenda Leyland. A woman innocent of any criminal act.
Questionable as to whether the same applies to those responsible for pushing this lady to commit suicide.
Of course we can say that no one could have known she would take her own life. But they ALL, each, and every one of them knew that such reporting by Sky, round the clock, screening the footage of Martin Brunt attack this lady, and followed by his Special Report, would have been enough to cause enormous distress and harm to whomever they chose as their target.
Brunt admitting yesterday that Brenda Leyland made such a comment to him, that she was thinking of this, should have been enough for Brunt to put a stop to this.
But they were all in too deep. They rolled with it.
We must not forget that Brenda Leyland was someone who held strong views about the McCann case, and voiced them. She cared that there should be justice for Madeleine, she was NOT a criminal.
The actions of Sky, Brunt, Gamble, the vile vigilantes, McCanns and Mitchell, their attack on this lady was completely unjustified.
Brunt is no innocent party, absolutely not.
Brunt sold his soul to the devil that is Murdoch, and based on his conduct yesterday he hasn't asked for it back.
Yesterday he continued his assault on Brenda Leyland her family by his non disclosure of information.
What he did to this lady, her family, I hope haunts this man for the rest of his life.
And to remind us, he may have whimpered yesterday felt sorry for himself but his harsh words during his Special Report about an innocent lady, tell us that he had not a jot of sympathy for what he had done to her. From Brunt's Special Report :
Brunt said:
After our initial exchange with Sweepy face she invited us in.
Off Camera she explained more about the anonymous tweets she sends from the heart of this pretty village. She had questions for the McCanns. She believed Twitter was a vehicle for expressing those thoughts.
She will probably never tweet again. She hoped she hadn’t broken the law.
Sweepy Face and the many others whose comments have been recorded may find that Scotland Yard may take a different view.
END
Martin Brunt, what a poor excuse for a decent human being. He showed not one iota of thought or care for this woman what he was doing to her. Now HE wants sympathy?
Brenda hadn't broken the law. Scotland Yard did Not take the same view as Brunt and his cronies.
Brenda Leyland did not discuss online the McCann case again. Brunt and his cruel cronies saw to that, they caused this lady to take her life. As her son Ben stated, Brunt was the final straw. This woman was being attacked, receiving real threats online. Brunt/Sky and the rest waded in!
And it has to be said. The reporting on this is shocking. Brenda Leyland is portrayed as some crazy lady who sat, and just fired off messages about the McCanns.
She was part of a group of many many people who discuss this case on Twitter, her twit messages were part of conversations with many others.
She was not some lone individual, not some nut just firing off messages. She made very valid, intelligent contribution to the discussions. She recognised absolutely that all was not right with this case, with the McCann version (s) of events.
And if truth be told that is the threat she posed the McCanns, like thousands of others, she knew the truth of what happened to little Madeleine has yet to be told.
We've heard an account of the truth by Kate McCann - only an account!
And that just won't cut it!
As to Martin Brunt, he has gotten off lightly. The Inquest is not a criminal trial, and he was informed that no criminal charges would be brought.
Perhaps, who knows, young Ben Leyland might have different ideas as to Brunt's fate!
-----------------------
l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com
http://l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com/Brunt_Devastated.html
21st March 2015
____________________
Dr Martin Roberts: "The evidence is that these are the pjyamas Madeleine wore on holiday in Praia da Luz. They were photographed and the photo handed to a press agency, who released it on 8 May, as the search for Madeleine continued. The McCanns held up these same pyjamas at two press conferences on 5 & 7June 2007. How could Madeleine have been abducted?"
Amelie McCann (aged 2): "Maddie's jammies!".
Tony Bennett- Investigator
- Posts : 16926
Activity : 24792
Likes received : 3749
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 77
Location : Shropshire
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
LG wrote:There is a write up here
http://forum4.aimoo.com/madeleinemccanncontroversy/WELCOME-to-HDH-Controversy-Info/Brenda-Leyland-Inquest-NOTES-from-the-Coroners-Court-Friday-Mar-20th-2015-1-2309869.html
It was extremely difficult to hear exactly what was being said at times. The only details I can add are the whole method of death was glossed over by the coroner, with the excuse that as there are no legal limits on the sale of helium she didn't want to give too much information. I like many more, probably, had already searched it after the Daily Star article on 28/02/15.. No evidence pertaining to the scene was offered, or mentioned ie photographs taken at the time etc. The only reference made was by Sgt Taylor, by using his hands to indicate the size of the canisters. I would guess at about 30 - 40cms the size of a domestic fire extinguisher. No mention of a hood or other paraphernalia. Wednesday 1st October was the last time BL emailed her son and BL spoke to MB on the same night. We were not told when she asked her neighbour to look after the cats nor when she checked into the hotel. No date was given for a confirmed last sighting. We were told that she died on 04/10/14.
Isn't it sad: they are going to look into the availability of helium, but the real cause of the suicide hasn't even be touched on.
Next lets ban all belts to prevent suicides by hanging.
____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?" Gerry
http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/?m=0
http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/
lj- Posts : 3329
Activity : 3590
Likes received : 208
Join date : 2009-12-01
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
So not one you could put in your handbag.The only reference made was by Sgt Taylor, by using his hands to indicate the size of the canisters. I would guess at about 30 - 40cms the size of a domestic fire extinguisher.
I would still like to know how this got to the hotel.
I still have lots of questions about all this as I'm sure many others do.
Guest- Guest
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
Also.. I saw someone say her iPad was on and was actually on the page for suicide by helium.
Is that true?
I also saw it claimed that Martin Brunt spoke to her (by phone?) after the doorstepping and she told him she thought of ending it all but "I've had a drink now and spoke to my son"... so Martin Brunt is the source for her alleged suicidal disposition?
Is this true?
So many questions.
I hope the family follow this up.
Is that true?
I also saw it claimed that Martin Brunt spoke to her (by phone?) after the doorstepping and she told him she thought of ending it all but "I've had a drink now and spoke to my son"... so Martin Brunt is the source for her alleged suicidal disposition?
Is this true?
So many questions.
I hope the family follow this up.
Guest- Guest
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
"I would still like to know how this got to the hotel."BlueBag wrote:So not one you could put in your handbag.The only reference made was by Sgt Taylor, by using his hands to indicate the size of the canisters. I would guess at about 30 - 40cms the size of a domestic fire extinguisher.
I would still like to know how this got to the hotel.
I still have lots of questions about all this as I'm sure many others do.
In a carrier bag, from a toy shop?
unchained melody- Posts : 161
Activity : 167
Likes received : 2
Join date : 2013-10-16
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
That's not what was described in court.
"The size of a domestic fire extinguisher". "30cm to 40cm long" - that's 12 to 15 inches.
I'm not going to believe stuff just because some official says so.
I want to see the evidence trail.
"The size of a domestic fire extinguisher". "30cm to 40cm long" - that's 12 to 15 inches.
I'm not going to believe stuff just because some official says so.
I want to see the evidence trail.
Guest- Guest
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
I think people are getting confused with the posts about ‘hippy-crack’, which is nitrous oxide (laughing gas) and can easily be purchased in the small canisters shown above, (similar size to the old soda-syphon CO2 cartridges), for whipping cream, and that has some euphoric and voice changing properties.
Helium tends to be used for filling party balloons and is often inhaled for its ‘squeaky’ voice changing properties, but generally comes in the larger canisters as described in court.
Both are asphyxiants.
Helium tends to be used for filling party balloons and is often inhaled for its ‘squeaky’ voice changing properties, but generally comes in the larger canisters as described in court.
Both are asphyxiants.
Doug D- Posts : 3719
Activity : 5286
Likes received : 1299
Join date : 2013-12-03
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
Feeling sorry for Brunt?
A follow-up by Lazz:
http://l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com/Feeling_Sorry_for_Brunt_.html
Snips:
‘What is more outrageous that by stating this, he was trying to make out, at the Inquest, that he had indeed protected Brenda Leyland, that his intention was not to make her identity known.
But what a despicable man, as, if we look back at what he said during his Special Report, it tells quite a different story.
Martin Brunt:
"This woman uses Twitter to attack the parents of Madeleine McCann. On the internet she's anonymous - NOT ANY MORE!"
Anyone who was feeling sorry for Brunt, still feeling sorry for him? I would certainly hope not!’
Continues…………..
‘It was not journalism, and it was not in the public interest. It was in the interest of the McCann family, to silence others, it was in the interest of Brunt as he thought he would be hailed a hero, and indeed he was, by the scum element of the McCann Support and by that other horrible excuse for a human being, Jim Gamble. Gamble, who incidently has NOT learned a lesson,
...and I have to say there is something seriously wrong with this guy. Evil personified, to still be spouting as he is, to still be of the opinion that what Brunt did was right. But then difficult for him not to when he himself CONGRATULATED Brunt on his attack on Brenda Leyland, telling Brunt that he did a great job.’………………………………
A follow-up by Lazz:
http://l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com/Feeling_Sorry_for_Brunt_.html
Snips:
‘What is more outrageous that by stating this, he was trying to make out, at the Inquest, that he had indeed protected Brenda Leyland, that his intention was not to make her identity known.
But what a despicable man, as, if we look back at what he said during his Special Report, it tells quite a different story.
Martin Brunt:
"This woman uses Twitter to attack the parents of Madeleine McCann. On the internet she's anonymous - NOT ANY MORE!"
Anyone who was feeling sorry for Brunt, still feeling sorry for him? I would certainly hope not!’
Continues…………..
‘It was not journalism, and it was not in the public interest. It was in the interest of the McCann family, to silence others, it was in the interest of Brunt as he thought he would be hailed a hero, and indeed he was, by the scum element of the McCann Support and by that other horrible excuse for a human being, Jim Gamble. Gamble, who incidently has NOT learned a lesson,
...and I have to say there is something seriously wrong with this guy. Evil personified, to still be spouting as he is, to still be of the opinion that what Brunt did was right. But then difficult for him not to when he himself CONGRATULATED Brunt on his attack on Brenda Leyland, telling Brunt that he did a great job.’………………………………
Doug D- Posts : 3719
Activity : 5286
Likes received : 1299
Join date : 2013-12-03
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
Doug D wrote:
No Jim, you silly billy. Brunt acted in the interests of his employers, the McCanns (that comma may well be superfluous) and himself.
Speaking as a member of the public I can't see how my interests were represented by this cack-handed conspiracy to suppress free speech.
Guest- Guest
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
Lazz never gets it wrong.Doug D wrote:Feeling sorry for Brunt?
A follow-up by Lazz:
http://l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com/Feeling_Sorry_for_Brunt_.html
Snips:
‘What is more outrageous that by stating this, he was trying to make out, at the Inquest, that he had indeed protected Brenda Leyland, that his intention was not to make her identity known.
But what a despicable man, as, if we look back at what he said during his Special Report, it tells quite a different story.
Martin Brunt:
"This woman uses Twitter to attack the parents of Madeleine McCann. On the internet she's anonymous - NOT ANY MORE!"
Anyone who was feeling sorry for Brunt, still feeling sorry for him? I would certainly hope not!’
Continues…………..
‘It was not journalism, and it was not in the public interest. It was in the interest of the McCann family, to silence others, it was in the interest of Brunt as he thought he would be hailed a hero, and indeed he was, by the scum element of the McCann Support and by that other horrible excuse for a human being, Jim Gamble. Gamble, who incidently has NOT learned a lesson,
...and I have to say there is something seriously wrong with this guy. Evil personified, to still be spouting as he is, to still be of the opinion that what Brunt did was right. But then difficult for him not to when he himself CONGRATULATED Brunt on his attack on Brenda Leyland, telling Brunt that he did a great job.’………………………………
Liz Eagles- Posts : 11153
Activity : 13562
Likes received : 2218
Join date : 2011-09-03
Re: BRENDA LEYLAND: Did Martin Brunt & SKY News (A) Break the OFCOM Code of Conduct and (B) Breach her Article 8 Human Rights Convention 'Right to Privacy' by doorstepping and then broadcasting her repeatedly on national TV?
Doug D wrote:
...and I have to say there is something seriously wrong with this guy"
---------------------------------------------------------
Child protection chief in TV probe
(UKPA) – 4 hours ago
The outgoing chief of Britain's child protection agency and the host of US TV show America's Most Wanted posed as paedophiles to investigate the sex trafficking of Cambodian youngsters.
JIM GAMBLE, 60 years old, EX CEO of CEOP, 'POSED' AS A PAEDOPHILE!
What does a paedophile even 'look' like?
Myles Bradbury, Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris, music 'teacher', Cyril Smith, SH, MC, Paul Gadd, etc., etc., etc.,
I wonder which 'type' of paedophile, 60 years old, J Gamble, 'posed' as? (Rock star, MP, Charidy 'fund' raiser, a national 'treasure', kiddies cancer 'doctor'?)
Jim Gamble, ex-chief executive of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop), and John Walsh said they were shocked when they went into a Cambodian bar where there were 50 to 60 girls.
Mr Walsh said: "Within two minutes a madam came up to us and said, 'What are you looking for?' and Mr Gamble said: 'We're looking for young girls.' She brought over three or four girls that were (about) 12 or 13 years old - very, very young."
Mr Gamble said "We're looking for YOUNG GIRLS"
Mr Gamble told her they wanted younger girls, Mr Walsh said. He said the woman replied: "What do you want? We have six and seven-year-old boys and girls. I can arrange that off premises."
Mr Gamble, 60 years old, ex CEO, of CEOP, told her, HE, (they), "WANTED 'YOUNGER' GIRLS"!
(Even YOUNGER than 12-13 years old girls)
YEP, there IS something SERIOUSLY, SERIOUSLY, 'WRONG' with THIS, now 63 years old, 'guy!
...and I have to say there is something seriously wrong with this guy"
---------------------------------------------------------
Child protection chief in TV probe
(UKPA) – 4 hours ago
The outgoing chief of Britain's child protection agency and the host of US TV show America's Most Wanted posed as paedophiles to investigate the sex trafficking of Cambodian youngsters.
JIM GAMBLE, 60 years old, EX CEO of CEOP, 'POSED' AS A PAEDOPHILE!
What does a paedophile even 'look' like?
Myles Bradbury, Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris, music 'teacher', Cyril Smith, SH, MC, Paul Gadd, etc., etc., etc.,
I wonder which 'type' of paedophile, 60 years old, J Gamble, 'posed' as? (Rock star, MP, Charidy 'fund' raiser, a national 'treasure', kiddies cancer 'doctor'?)
Jim Gamble, ex-chief executive of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (Ceop), and John Walsh said they were shocked when they went into a Cambodian bar where there were 50 to 60 girls.
Mr Walsh said: "Within two minutes a madam came up to us and said, 'What are you looking for?' and Mr Gamble said: 'We're looking for young girls.' She brought over three or four girls that were (about) 12 or 13 years old - very, very young."
Mr Gamble said "We're looking for YOUNG GIRLS"
Mr Gamble told her they wanted younger girls, Mr Walsh said. He said the woman replied: "What do you want? We have six and seven-year-old boys and girls. I can arrange that off premises."
Mr Gamble, 60 years old, ex CEO, of CEOP, told her, HE, (they), "WANTED 'YOUNGER' GIRLS"!
(Even YOUNGER than 12-13 years old girls)
YEP, there IS something SERIOUSLY, SERIOUSLY, 'WRONG' with THIS, now 63 years old, 'guy!
jeanmonroe- Posts : 5818
Activity : 7756
Likes received : 1674
Join date : 2013-02-07
Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
» 'The mob' killed Brenda Leyland. Will the same mob kill Martin Brunt? - Article by Martin Samuel in the 'Daily Mail', 7.1.2015
» Sun: 63 comments still showing - one of them even accusing McCanns and Martin Brunt over Brenda Leyland's death
» When one Brenda Leyland just isn't enough for Madeleine McCann's parents: WE'LL REPORT TROLLS TO COPS'
» Brenda Leyland - Hounded to death by SKY News, died 4 October 2014 - LEST WE FORGET
» Brenda Leyland remembered - two years after men from SKY News, owned by the world’s most powerful media mogul, Rupert Murdoch, hounded her to death
» Sun: 63 comments still showing - one of them even accusing McCanns and Martin Brunt over Brenda Leyland's death
» When one Brenda Leyland just isn't enough for Madeleine McCann's parents: WE'LL REPORT TROLLS TO COPS'
» Brenda Leyland - Hounded to death by SKY News, died 4 October 2014 - LEST WE FORGET
» Brenda Leyland remembered - two years after men from SKY News, owned by the world’s most powerful media mogul, Rupert Murdoch, hounded her to death
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ :: Social Media :: Brenda Leyland: Gerry McCann called for example to be made of 'trolls'
Page 4 of 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum