SY Tanneman photo data

by Claire25 31.10.14 9:44

Have you seen this post on FB? Sorry I can't post the image from my phone, can someone else?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Woofer 31.10.14 10:02

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

They`ve noticed that the MET put this on their website on 22nd April 2013, six months before the Crimewatch programme. And would they have waited six months if they considered Maddie was findable or still alive.

by **PeterMac** 31.10.14 10:28

Background data, like metadata on a photo, is going to be a serious problem for Spin Doctors

I am going to copy it here, as it deserves the widest audience possible. Names redacted

Not my spot, but a belter that deserves as wide an audience as possible.

Wow. So Smithman was kept under wraps for a further unnecessary 6 months too

Remember Kate and Gerry looking very grim indeed at a vigil on Madeleine's birthday or anniversary in May 2013. Could this be why?

First time we ever saw them look genuinely upset.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]" />

Must have lost her bank cards?

Lol. No this fits imo. We all wondered at the time if they'd been delivered some unwelcome news from SY and I reckon the supposed discovery of Crecheman and the implications for Smithman could well have burst a very big bubble

So did SY move from review to investigation in early July 2013 to force the "fund" to give Exton permission to hand over the Smithman e-fits and the "hypercritical" report. (I'm aware the McCanns have denied this, claimed they handed it over themselves in 2011 and sued the paper. But they won't have had to prove it and can't see any reason why Exton would make that up). What a blinder of a find Jon.

by joyce1938 31.10.14 10:33

Whow petermac,something that just makes sense at last,yes we did all ponder what the faces and head bowing meant your reply seems to make it more real . joyce1938

by Claire25 03.11.14 10:40

Would this be something OG don't want seen (Google whooshing)?

by HelenMeg 03.11.14 11:16

Yes, they were genuinely grief-stricken on that occaision and most of us were amazed because it was one of the only times that we have seen genuine emotion and heartbreak in their faces. It stood out by a mile.

For me - this says that they had perhaps been given unwelcome news re the investigation which enabled
their true grief for Madeleine to momentarily stop being suppressed. All the time they have been playing a charade it will have meant that their real emotions have been suppressed. For the floodgates to actually open - there needed to be some sort of jolt. Some sort of trigger. To enable them to grieve.
I sincerely believe that the best thing that could happen for them would be something that enabled them to 'release the tears of truth'.

Once the truth emerges their psychological stress load will lighten enormously, despite any consequences of the law. That also goes for whoever was at the heart of this - the person who was being protected by the last Labour government..

by Snifferdog 03.11.14 12:01

HelenMeg snipped: and my mistake corrected therein. Sorry

For me - this says that they had perhaps been given unwelcome news re the investigation which enabled
their true grief for ~~themselves~~ Madeleine momentarily stop being suppressed. All the time they have been playing a charade it will have meant that their real emotions have been suppressed. For the floodgates to actually open - there needed to be some sort of jolt. Some sort of trigger. To enable them to grieve.

by **Nina** 03.11.14 19:08

I have looked like this today, grief stricken, but nobody would know why, so it doesn't have to be that they were grieving for Madeleine, they might just have been grieving for their own sorry skins. In my opinion only.

by Guest 03.11.14 19:13

Nina wrote: I have looked like this today, grief stricken, but nobody would know why, so it doesn't have to be that they were grieving for Madeleine, they might just have been grieving for their own sorry skins. In my opinion only.

I hope you're OK, Nina roses

by **Nina** 03.11.14 19:16

Dee Coy wrote:
Nina wrote: I have looked like this today, grief stricken, but nobody would know why, so it doesn't have to be that they were grieving for Madeleine, they might just have been grieving for their own sorry skins. In my opinion only.

I hope you're OK, Nina

Dee Coy, many thanks. Yes I will be.

by Claire25 04.11.14 0:04

More to rhe point, why did SY wait six months before revealing their revelation moment?

by ultimaThule 04.11.14 2:18

PeterMac wrote:Background data, like metadata on a photo, is going to be a serious problem for Spin Doctors

I am going to copy it here, as it deserves the widest audience possible. Names redacted

Not my spot, but a belter that deserves as wide an audience as possible.

Wow. So Smithman was kept under wraps for a further unnecessary 6 months too

Remember Kate and Gerry looking very grim indeed at a vigil on Madeleine's birthday or anniversary in May 2013. Could this be why?

First time we ever saw them look genuinely upset.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]" />

Must have lost her bank cards?

Lol. No this fits imo. We all wondered at the time if they'd been delivered some unwelcome news from SY and I reckon the supposed discovery of Crecheman and the implications for Smithman could well have burst a very big bubble

So did SY move from review to investigation in early July 2013 to force the "fund" to give Exton permission to hand over the Smithman e-fits and the "hypercritical" report. (I'm aware the McCanns have denied this, claimed they handed it over themselves in 2011 and sued the paper. But they won't have had to prove it and can't see any reason why Exton would make that up). What a blinder of a find Jon.

'Genuninely upset?' nah

Not from where I'm sitting.

These poses have been seen before; the seemingly sorrowful bowed head of Kate and the grim face of her spouse, but it's an entirely different picture when the camera's turned off.

Is that middle-aged matron in the foreground Mrs Oldfield? And could that be Grace, the sick baby who was left unattended for 5 consecutive nights along with the other unlucky offspring of that group of self-absorbed, and I use the word only in its biological sense, 'parents' who chose to put their own needs before those of their children.

by Guest 04.11.14 10:05

If you mean the woman in the red coat, that's Kate's friend Karen McCalman, the one time administrator of the fund.

I certainly agree that the McCanns are capable of switching off emotions in the blink of an eye.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

A reminder of how they were caught out at 2.40 on this clip.

by Guest 04.11.14 15:14

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

...incredible!!!!

by Guest 04.11.14 15:15

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

...speaks for itself!!!
...after the interview was finished!
Exactly 1 year after Madeleine disappeared!
Are they all blind?????

by Guest 04.11.14 15:28

As Gerry says in this interview:
"...we need to get people focused on the facts..."

...and that´s what we are doing here!!!!

What a "pity" that the BBC didn´t cut this out thumbup

!!!
Purpose????

by **PeterMac** 04.11.14 15:37

Hard at work - Searching . . .

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]" />

by Guest 04.11.14 15:56

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

What can be so funny, 6 days after your daughter disappeared!
We can proceed this endless!!!

...but "he" needs people to get focused on the facts!
So, what are the facts?

by Guest 04.11.14 16:04

Hello,

what happened to timekeeping on the forum?

I get all posts to stop around midnight

by Guest 04.11.14 16:06

Let's not forget Uncle John's high as a kite performance on 9th May 2007!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Portia: see if your time zone is correct. Go to your profile, then to preferences.

by Guest 04.11.14 16:07

Marian wrote:Let's not forget Uncle John's high as a kite performance on 9th May 2007!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Portia: see if your time zone is correct. Go to your profile then preferences.

Willdo, thank you!

by Guest 04.11.14 16:09

Forumotion has been updating its system.

I had been moved to Papua New Guinea!

by **PeterMac** 04.11.14 16:19

Marian wrote:Forumotion has been updating its system.
I had been moved to Papua New Guinea!

That's where I saw you !

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Guest 04.11.14 16:47

PeterMac wrote:
Marian wrote:Forumotion has been updating its system.
I had been moved to Papua New Guinea!

That's where I saw you !

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

...not too bad!
At least they have good weather...

by MRNOODLES 04.11.14 17:32

PeterMac wrote:
Marian wrote:Forumotion has been updating its system.
I had been moved to Papua New Guinea!

That's where I saw you !

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Jesus H Christ what the heck is the bloke on the left doing? what

by j.rob 04.11.14 17:45

Are these the latest suspects? They don't look very like Smith-man! Don't you think someone at OC would have noticed them carrying Madeleine away?

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by Guest 04.11.14 17:59

These many "funny moments" bring me back to my major concerns about this case:
Even if I am a narcissist, how can I - a few days after the disappearance of my daughter - be so funny yet - not knowing (?) what has happenened to her?
I can not imagine that the parents do not love their children! If I am - as parents -would be involved in the death of my daughter - even it was an accident, then
Why do I do everything I can that police investigations are taken instead of being "quiet" and happy about nobody asking?
...only because of money and becoming VIPs????

Why does a government commissioned SY receiving inquiries in this case, if this should not lead to an actual result?
...spending millions of pounds...

WHY do the UK MSM act the same way? Not asking any questiones about all these contradicitons?
Just for selling a few papers more?????

Why are so many people brought to silence - just because of asking reasonable questions?

I simply don´t understand it - there´s is no visible reason to me! What´s there all behind????

Meanwhile the only thing I believe in are the dogs!

(I truly hope, everbody understands what I´m trying to say! ...I´m no native speaker...needless to say nah

)

by j.rob 04.11.14 18:18

I think there was a plan for a faked abduction of a live Madeleine which went wrong. I think this is the 'disaster' Gerry spoke of. This would tie in with the Mcs wanting a role as ambassadors for missing people.

by Guest 04.11.14 18:28

j.rob wrote:I think there was a plan for a faked abduction of a live Madeleine which went wrong. I think this is the 'disaster' Gerry spoke of. This would tie in with the Mcs wanting a role as ambassadors for missing people.

...but why then all these "funny" episodes when the camera went off???

by AlexBG 04.11.14 18:54

Marian wrote:I certainly agree that the McCanns are capable of switching off emotions in the blink of an eye.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

A reminder of how they were caught out at 2.40 on this clip.

There was a much longer example of this sort of behaviour on YouTube - several seconds of raw, unedited footage which showed the McCs after an interview when they thought the cameras had stopped rolling, but it appears to have been whooshed now.

I presume a disgusted member of a TV station's staff had uploaded it.