Here we go! "Madeleine: Book Sheds Light On Mystery Predator"

Markus 2 wrote:http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/507849/Madeleine-McCann-hunt-slowed-by-court-chaos I think the media has been reporting similar stories. Does not look like it is going anywhere soon.
“This all means that Maddie is taking a low priority because all the effort is going on keeping the courts running. There is also a new prosecutor in Portimao on the Algarve who is having to be fully briefed on scores of cases, including Madeleine’s, and that all takes time. Wonder who is briefing the new prosecutor.

Monty Heck wrote:Woofer"]Do they think we're all stupid.

Have you ever heard of such a ridiculous BACKFILL excuse to explain away the fact that no stranger DNA was found in the apartment as :-

"What they noticed about this man was that he was wearing what seemed to be a surgical mask and he had wound laundry around his feet, seemingly to keep from making prints or leaving marks."

[Wonder whether he brought the laundry with him or had to locate/raid the laundry basket first. The few minutes the abductor would have had to commit the crime according to the timelines just became incredibly busier, since he surely would not have arrived in what seemed like a surgical mask and laundry wound around his feet. Even though the evening was quiet it was only 9.15 and it's on record that there were people around, none of whom reported seeing this  apparition.  Attempting to link the M disappearance to the case above seems tenuous and seriously flawed.

Boosey wrote:Goodness I think I know who this man was. The description fits anyway - Lazarus!!

BlueBag wrote:

Monty Heck wrote:Woofer"]Do they think we're all stupid.

Have you ever heard of such a ridiculous BACKFILL excuse to explain away the fact that no stranger DNA was found in the apartment as :-

"What they noticed about this man was that he was wearing what seemed to be a surgical mask and he had wound laundry around his feet, seemingly to keep from making prints or leaving marks."

[Wonder whether he brought the laundry with him or had to locate/raid the laundry basket first. The few minutes the abductor would have had to commit the crime according to the timelines just became incredibly busier, since he surely would not have arrived in what seemed like a surgical mask and laundry wound around his feet. Even though the evening was quiet it was only 9.15 and it's on record that there were people around, none of whom reported seeing this  apparition.  Attempting to link the M disappearance to the case above seems tenuous and seriously flawed.

This is all so incredibly utterly stupid I want to scream.

This whole nonsense has a pink tinge.

These people KNOW this is stupid which will make them accessories when justice prevails.

jeanmonroe wrote:

Woofer wrote:Do they think we're all stupid.

Have you ever heard of such a ridiculous BACKFILL excuse to explain away the fact that no stranger DNA was found in the apartment as :-

"What they noticed about this man was that he was wearing what seemed to be a surgical mask and he had wound laundry around his feet, seemingly to keep from making prints or leaving marks."

"IT WUZ THAT PREDATORY EGYPTIAN 'MUMMY' WOT DUNIT, INNIT GUV?"

"book the tax payer funded flights to Sharm el-Sheikh, boys. We'll go undercover, so bestest tourist disguise" says DCI Mahogany of OG.

PeterMac wrote:So the instructions from TM and CM were clearly

!  Ignore the shutters
2  Ignore the front door / patio door
3  Ignore the closed / open curtains
4  Ignore the lies
5  Ignore the non-existent Window of Opportunity
6  Ignore Smithman /-men
7  Try to disparage the dogs
8  Go for Spotty-Charity man
9  If in doubt bring in Laundry-feet-surgical-mask man from three years before

I want my money back !

Markus 2 wrote:Anything in the book about these two, the one that was actually seen carrying a child and not just lurking.

Marnelakis wrote:You couldn't make it up honestly!  Just saw the authors on Sky news saying that if Mark Warner had put a note in the apartment warning of recent sexual assaults on children then they would have made sure the doors were locked before they went out...So they would still have gone out then????

Tony Bennett wrote:

Marnelakis wrote:You couldn't make it up honestly!  Just saw the authors on Sky news saying that if Mark Warner had put a note in the apartment warning of recent sexual assaults on children then they would have made sure the doors were locked before they went out...So they would still have gone out then????

On their very own testimony in front of millions on TV, they admitted to going out AGAIN after BOTH Madeleine and Sean reported that they had been crying the night before.

In mitigation, Dr Gerald McCann claimed that they nearly didn't, though

Silverspeed wrote:

Tony Bennett wrote:

Marnelakis wrote:You couldn't make it up honestly!  Just saw the authors on Sky news saying that if Mark Warner had put a note in the apartment warning of recent sexual assaults on children then they would have made sure the doors were locked before they went out...So they would still have gone out then????

On their very own testimony in front of millions on TV, they admitted to going out AGAIN after BOTH Madeleine and Sean reported that they had been crying the night before.

In mitigation, Dr Gerald McCann claimed that they nearly didn't, though

All within the boundaries of responsible parenting of course.

Tony Bennett wrote:

Silverspeed wrote:

Tony Bennett wrote:

Marnelakis wrote:You couldn't make it up honestly!  Just saw the authors on Sky news saying that if Mark Warner had put a note in the apartment warning of recent sexual assaults on children then they would have made sure the doors were locked before they went out...So they would still have gone out then????

On their very own testimony in front of millions on TV, they admitted to going out AGAIN after BOTH Madeleine and Sean reported that they had been crying the night before.

In mitigation, Dr Gerald McCann claimed that they nearly didn't, though

All within the boundaries of responsible parenting of course.

Silverspeed, I insist on accuracy.

The actual quote in Dr Kate McCann's book was 'WELL within the bounds of responsible parenting..."

Bishop Brennan wrote:It's becoming ever clearer that this is a major part of the End Game. When SY realised they would find not a shred of evidence of abduction or abductor, an alternative close was needed.   This is it.  This book is designed to completely replace the PJ shelving report.  It is the rewrite of history that had been predicted for a year or more.  

Published in the UK and with not even a hint or warning about libel; serialised in the press,and advertised on Sky.  Everyone will know about this definitive work.  This totally independent in depth review.  The Truth.  

And as authors not cops, they can say anything they like. So long as it's an abduction fantasy then nobody will contradict them. No matter how ridiculous the claim or story.  It suits SY, it suits the Mccanns, it suits the government. 

And so that would seem to be that.

canada12 wrote:I wonder if the authors didn't interview Kate and Gerry out of choice, or because Kate and Gerry declined to be interviewed.

I also wonder if the authors interviewed any of the Tapas friends.

I wonder if this will just be a rehash of available news stories, rewritten in the authors' own words and packaged up to look like original writing.

It'll be interesting to see if there are any new revelations that we haven't seen before.