The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Ruling Mm11

Ruling Regist10
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Ruling Mm11

Ruling Regist10

Ruling

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Ruling Empty Ruling

Post by Shhh 01.06.14 21:27

Just saw this on Facebook


http://frommybigdesk.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/madeleine-mccann-judge-rules-that-kate.html
avatar
Shhh

Posts : 198
Activity : 238
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2012-03-03

Back to top Go down

Ruling Empty Re: Ruling

Post by Woofer 01.06.14 21:50

Perhaps this could go on the other thread.

Anna Esse concludes :
"For me, the above highlighted text suggests that Kate and Gerry McCann must show that before they took their libel action against Gonçalo Amaral they had authorisation to bring the action in Madeleine's name. The text above states that the McCanns must produce the documentation "in the records," of the British court, i.e., something which already exists, rather than something they will now apply for. "
Woofer
Woofer

Posts : 3390
Activity : 3508
Likes received : 14
Join date : 2012-02-06

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum