The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.


Jill Havern
Forum owner

Coloboma - not Madeleine

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Coloboma - not Madeleine

Post by BlueBag on 06.05.15 8:50

Same old photo nonsense.

There is only one photo that matters.

BlueBag

Posts : 3562
Reputation : 1351
Join date : 2014-06-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Coloboma - not Madeleine

Post by j.rob on 06.05.15 13:43

Irrespective of whether the photo/s are weird or not, the caption IS ambiguous. If it's a mistake, it is a very clumsy one to have made. 

And if Madeleine did not have a coloboma, only a few dark specs in her eye, then how come the child in this photo that the newspaper article claimed was Madeleine has what looks like a coloboma? In other words eye markings very similar to the early poster campaign?

If Madeleine McCann DIDN'T have a coloboma, as her parents say, but merely a few dark flecks in her eye, then how come this child has a coloboma?

They can't have it both ways.



http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/multimedia/dynamic/00158/mccann_158438k.jpg

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Coloboma - not Madeleine

Post by plebgate on 06.05.15 13:48

@j.rob wrote:Irrespective of whether the photo/s are weird or not, the caption IS ambiguous. If it's a mistake, it is a very clumsy one to have made. 

And if Madeleine did not have a coloboma, only a few dark specs in her eye, then how come the child in this photo that the newspaper article claimed was Madeleine has what looks like a coloboma? In other words eye markings very similar to the early poster campaign?

If Madeleine McCann DIDN'T have a coloboma, as her parents say, but merely a few dark flecks in her eye, then how come this child has a coloboma?

They can't have it both ways.



http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/multimedia/dynamic/00158/mccann_158438k.jpg
Good point.   I magnified the photo and it does definitely look like a coloboma.

plebgate

Posts : 5465
Reputation : 1180
Join date : 2013-02-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Coloboma - not Madeleine

Post by BlueBag on 06.05.15 13:56

@j.rob wrote:Irrespective of whether the photo/s are weird or not, the caption IS ambiguous. 
No it ISN'T ambiguous.

The top picture is Madeleine and below left is a picture of Amelie.

Why do you and others keep picking on tedious nothings about photos?

BlueBag

Posts : 3562
Reputation : 1351
Join date : 2014-06-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Coloboma - not Madeleine

Post by j.rob on 06.05.15 14:17

@BlueBag wrote:
@j.rob wrote:Irrespective of whether the photo/s are weird or not, the caption IS ambiguous. 
No it ISN'T ambiguous.

The top picture is Madeleine and below left is a picture of Amelie.

Why do you and others keep picking on tedious nothings about photos?

I wasn't going to reply to you again because I find your attitude really irritating. But I am going to reply because, once again, you are writing rubbish.

Nowhere on the caption to the photo does it STATE that the child at the top of the photo is Madeleine. The reader assumes that the child at the top is Madeleine because the caption starts: "The arrival of Madeleine" and this appears under the top photo, so you naturally assume that the top photo relates to the statement: "the arrival of Madeleine." The caption goes on to state: "followed by Sean and Amelie (below left).

Strictly speaking the phrase "below left" does not relate to the small photo which you claim is of Amelie to the immediate left of this caption. As the small photo is not below, but merely to the left. So logically, the photo to the left could just as well be of Sean. After Amelie's name is states 'below left' so, based on the caption, the only child below left would be Amelie.

In any event the child at the top and the child to the left look very similar. So I would be inclined to think they were both Madeleine. Whereas the child at the bottom looks different.

But, irrespective of all that, if the child at the bottom is Madeleine, as you claim, then why does she have a coloboma? Madeleine McCann does not have a coloboma.

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Coloboma - not Madeleine

Post by BlueBag on 06.05.15 15:27

Nowhere on the caption to the photo does it STATE that the child at the top of the photo is Madeleine. The reader assumes that the child at the top is Madeleine because the caption starts: "The arrival of Madeleine"

Correct... and everything follows from that.

Now stop talking about nothing.

We don't want to look like nutters or anything.

BlueBag

Posts : 3562
Reputation : 1351
Join date : 2014-06-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Cuddlecat?

Post by Miraflores on 06.05.15 16:31

Is this the first, (and only) sighting of Madeleine with cuddlecat? Or is it the pink blanket that she is clutching?

Miraflores

Posts : 845
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2011-06-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum