The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Page 2 of 8 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by tasprin on 08.12.13 12:32

Many people have thought the Webmaster is Kate McCann.
Who said the image must NOT be removed - the McCanns or Operation Grange? Why would the Grange team want to publicise the image of an innocent man whom DCI Redwood has categorically ruled out of the inquiry? What is the point of doing that? It makes no sense - unless it is part of the 'confusion is good' campaign - as it is deliberately misleading and a hindrance to the search

tasprin

Posts : 834
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-01-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by mysterion on 08.12.13 12:42

TM are running the show. SY are no more than agents. PJ need to be brought into line. That is the impression I get.

mysterion

Posts : 358
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2013-11-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by Bishop Brennan on 08.12.13 12:43

This appeared recently on the main official FB page:

We've had questions regarding our online store being unavailable and when will it be available again. Google Checkout was retired on 21 November. Because Google Checkout is no longer available, we are redesigning our online store with another merchant system. I'm finishing the design/setup and will have the online store available soon. Thank you for your patience while we make this change.


No news as to why Tannerman still features though.

Bishop Brennan

Posts : 695
Reputation : 217
Join date : 2013-10-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by SixMillionQuid on 08.12.13 12:44

Webmaster could be

"It is booming," said Calum MacRae, director of Infohost, the Scottish IT company behind the findmadeleine site. "We didn't expect this number of people. "We had 10 million hits between 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Thursday -- our server just gave up, but we resolved that within five minutes."

The website www.bringmadeleinehome.com was launched on May 9 and it changed to www.findmadeleine.com on Wednesday.

Messages of support from across Europe, the United States and Australia have been posted on the site.



"You are in my thoughts every day," wrote Heidi from Finland. "I pray that she will be found soon safe and well."

Debbie Bates, from Australia, wrote: "As a mother of two, I cannot imagine for a moment what you are going through."



Parents Kate and Gerry McCann are taking "immense strength" from the messages, said family member Michael Wright.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/2007/05/18/uk-portugal-girl-website-idUKL1820079420070518?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0

____________________
"It is my belief that Scotland Yard was set out on a mission, not one to find out what happened to Madeleine McCann but to rewrite the history of the case in such a way that the majority of the public simply forgets the past." - The Pat Brown Criminal Profiling Agency

SixMillionQuid

Posts : 436
Reputation : 7
Join date : 2013-10-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by chillyheat on 08.12.13 12:54

Policeman's son Calum MacRae, 18, is responsible for the campaign's website and distribution network for Madeleine's campaign from the unlikely location of the Loch Broom garage, on a windswept industrial estate on the outskirts of Ullapool, Wester Ross.

Could it be him ?
 
http://companycheck.co.uk/company/SC247151/INFOHOST-LIMITED/directors-shareholders
Company Status Financial Statements too old ???

chillyheat

Posts : 814
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2013-10-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by jeanmonroe on 08.12.13 13:00

@ChillyHeat wrote:Policeman's son Calum MacRae, 18, is responsible for the campaign's website and distribution network for Madeleine's campaign from the unlikely location of the Loch Broom garage, on a windswept industrial estate on the outskirts of Ullapool, Wester Ross.

Could it be him ?
 
WHO 'received' the £37,000 for the 're-designed' Findmadeleine web site?

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5129
Reputation : 884
Join date : 2013-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by SixMillionQuid on 08.12.13 13:01

@ChillyHeat wrote:Policeman's son Calum MacRae, 18, is responsible for the campaign's website and distribution network for Madeleine's campaign from the unlikely location of the Loch Broom garage, on a windswept industrial estate on the outskirts of Ullapool, Wester Ross.

Could it be him ?
 
Maybe. I would imagine the McCanns would place their trust in only a few[color:f6e4=000000], [color:f6e4=000000]select[color:f6e4=000000], li[color:f6e4=000000]ke-minded people.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id34.html

Calum is already working on new ventures after spotting a market in missing-person websites. Last week he contacted the family of missing schoolgirl Rosemary Edwards, from Hampshire, after her father made an emotional TV appeal. He said: "I don't think we should be making money out of it, but I would love to do more stuff like this. We phoned up to see if they wanted a website for that missing girl, but they haven't called back."

[color:f6e4=000000][color:f6e4=000000]Oh the irony!  big grin

SixMillionQuid

Posts : 436
Reputation : 7
Join date : 2013-10-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by chillyheat on 08.12.13 13:08

Calum, who has designed websites "since he was 10" is paid out of the global donations to the fund, which won't be contributing to the McCanns' legal costs.
 
He refused to be drawn on how much his team of six are paid, and the Sunday Herald's repeated calls to the fund's spokeswoman, Esther McVey, were not returned. He added: "I can't tell you that, it's not much honestly. We are just covering our costs. You would need to speak to the fund about that."


What a dreadful scam....

chillyheat

Posts : 814
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2013-10-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by Ashwarya on 08.12.13 13:14

@Jontait wrote:It does open a can of worms, doesn't it? I woke this morning to a VERY angry email from the webmaster, berating me for posting our correspondence online.
Well done to you - terrific use of Twitter.  Has "Webmaster" actually said anywhere that Operation Grange asked her to keep Tannerman on the site?  I may have missed that so apologies if so.

The innocent crèche father must be hopping mad at being kept under suspicion like this when Scotland Yard have publicly cleared him. angry2

Ashwarya

Posts : 141
Reputation : 17
Join date : 2011-04-23

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by Bishop Brennan on 08.12.13 13:22

And Mr Redwood really could not have been clearer on the Dutch version of Crimewatch. After the 'reconstruction', the presenter spoke to Redwood and said that for over 6 years the man seen at 9:15 had been the 'main suspect'.  Redwood's reply:

"Our investigation has shown that almost certainly that man is not Madeleine's abductor."  


Unlike on the UK version, he did not mention 'crecheman' - but limited himself to the above statement.

Full link available for those interested.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyp2Buvv8pM&feature=youtu.be


And from the MET's own website:

"We believe we have identified the man who was seen by Jane Tanner carrying a child at about 21.15 near the apartment G5A"

Bishop Brennan

Posts : 695
Reputation : 217
Join date : 2013-10-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by Guest on 08.12.13 13:57

@ChillyHeat wrote:Policeman's son Calum MacRae, 18, is responsible for the campaign's website and distribution network for Madeleine's campaign from the unlikely location of the Loch Broom garage, on a windswept industrial estate on the outskirts of Ullapool, Wester Ross.

Could it be him ?
 
http://companycheck.co.uk/company/SC247151/INFOHOST-LIMITED/directors-shareholders
Company Status Financial Statements too old ???
Hmm. Ullapool again...

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by margaret on 08.12.13 14:47

E
@mysterion wrote:TM are running the show. SY are no more than agents. PJ need to be brought into line. That is the impression I get.
Don't be daft, how can the Mccanns be running anything when their abductor's been ruled out by SY?

margaret

Posts : 585
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-09-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by Woofer on 08.12.13 14:50

Dee Coy wrote:
@ChillyHeat wrote:Policeman's son Calum MacRae, 18, is responsible for the campaign's website and distribution network for Madeleine's campaign from the unlikely location of the Loch Broom garage, on a windswept industrial estate on the outskirts of Ullapool, Wester Ross.

Could it be him ?
 
http://companycheck.co.uk/company/SC247151/INFOHOST-LIMITED/directors-shareholders
Company Status Financial Statements too old ???
Hmm. Ullapool again...
Wasn`t Calum one of Auntie Phil`s pupils at the Ullapool school?

Woofer

Posts : 3390
Reputation : 12
Join date : 2012-02-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by Guest on 08.12.13 15:48

@Woofer wrote: Wasn`t Calum one of Auntie Phil`s pupils at the Ullapool school?
***
That's how I remember it too.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by canada12 on 08.12.13 15:49

WHOIS search results for: FINDMADELEINE.COM (Registered)
Is this your
domain?
GO
Add hosting, email and more.
Want to buy
this domain?
GO
Get it with our Domain Buy service.
Domain Name: FINDMADELEINE.COM
Registry Domain ID: 967266690_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Update Date: 2013-05-03 08:54:50
Creation Date: 2007-05-10 03:40:00
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2015-05-10 03:40:00
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Registration Private
Registrant Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Registrant Street: DomainsByProxy.com
Registrant Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Registrant City: Scottsdale
Registrant State/Province: Arizona
Registrant Postal Code: 85260
Registrant Country: United States
Registrant Phone: (480) 624-2599
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax: (480) 624-2598
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: FINDMADELEINE.COM@domainsbyproxy.com
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Registration Private
Admin Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Admin Street: DomainsByProxy.com
Admin Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Admin City: Scottsdale
Admin State/Province: Arizona
Admin Postal Code: 85260
Admin Country: United States
Admin Phone: (480) 624-2599
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax: (480) 624-2598
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: FINDMADELEINE.COM@domainsbyproxy.com
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Registration Private
Tech Organization: Domains By Proxy, LLC
Tech Street: DomainsByProxy.com
Tech Street: 14747 N Northsight Blvd Suite 111, PMB 309
Tech City: Scottsdale
Tech State/Province: Arizona
Tech Postal Code: 85260
Tech Country: United States
Tech Phone: (480) 624-2599
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax: (480) 624-2598
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: FINDMADELEINE.COM@domainsbyproxy.com
Name Server: PDNS03.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: PDNS04.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
Last update of WHOIS database: 2013-12-8T15:00:00Z

They've certainly gone to great lengths to protect their privacy, making sure their registration and admin contact info is kept anonymous.

canada12

Posts : 1457
Reputation : 185
Join date : 2013-10-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by aiyoyo on 08.12.13 16:02

@tiny wrote:You seriously don't believe what the fm webmaster said,why on earth would grange ask them to keep it there IF they are
no longer looking for him.
Why not?

As he said he's not privy to info from Grange Team. Why should he?  
And I believe neither would his paymaster, the Mccanns, be privy to it.  
The Police will do what they do and for all we know Mccanns found out about Crecheman just like us ie through the media.

All he did was follow his paymaster's instructions.    
I should think it's not his position to question the Mccanns what they want or don't want on their website.

Since Kate & Gerrry and relative forms half of the Trustees/Directors of the Fund, the pertinent question might be: are the rest of the independent (?) Trustees agreeable to this decision not to remove Tannerman in spite of Redwood's announcement?


If there's such thing as FOI on Pte Ltd Company, some questions could be posed to the Independent Directors. After all they're collectively responsible for info for public consumption on the "FindMadeleine" website and should there be ambiguity on any of the info that can mislead the public they're all answerable.

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by tiny on 08.12.13 16:15

@aiyoyo wrote:
@tiny wrote:You seriously don't believe what the fm webmaster said,why on earth would grange ask them to keep it there IF they are
no longer looking for him.
Why not?

As he said he's not privy to info from Grange Team. Why should he?  
And I believe neither would his paymaster, the Mccanns, be privy to it.  
The Police will do what they do and for all we know Mccanns found out about Crecheman just like us ie through the media.

All he did was follow his paymaster's instructions.    
I should think it's not his position to question the Mccanns what they want or don't want on their website.

Since Kate & Gerrry and relative forms half of the Trustees/Directors of the Fund, the pertinent question might be: are the rest of the independent (?) Trustees agreeable to this decision not to remove Tannerman in spite of Redwood's announcement?
  They are all collectively responsible for info on the "FindMadeleine" website.  
so you believe grange ask them to keep it there,although he has been eliminated,ok

tiny

Posts : 2274
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2010-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by aiyoyo on 08.12.13 16:18

@tiny wrote:
@aiyoyo wrote:
@tiny wrote:You seriously don't believe what the fm webmaster said,why on earth would grange ask them to keep it there IF they are
no longer looking for him.
Why not?

As he said he's not privy to info from Grange Team. Why should he?  
And I believe neither would his paymaster, the Mccanns, be privy to it.  
The Police will do what they do and for all we know Mccanns found out about Crecheman just like us ie through the media.

All he did was follow his paymaster's instructions.    
I should think it's not his position to question the Mccanns what they want or don't want on their website.

Since Kate & Gerrry and relative forms half of the Trustees/Directors of the Fund, the pertinent question might be: are the rest of the independent (?) Trustees agreeable to this decision not to remove Tannerman in spite of Redwood's announcement?
  They are all collectively responsible for info on the "FindMadeleine" website.  
so you believe grange ask them to keep it there,although he has been eliminated,ok
You've lost me there? Grange asked who?


aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by Guest on 08.12.13 16:41

@Bishop Brennan wrote:
"Our investigation has shown that almost certainly that man is not Madeleine's abductor."  

"Almost" certainly? Almost? I hope they've kept the chap's contact details in case they decide he is the abductor after all.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by mysterion on 08.12.13 16:46

Tannerman has not been eliminated. He has almost been eliminated according to SY`s quote. The MET only believe they have identified him. Leaves room for the website to keep him and maintain credibility with their supporters around the world especially the ones that haven`t seen CW. If SY were running things TM would be helping them by showing Smithman. If SY were running things TM would be charged with obstructing an investigation by promoting false information about a former suspect and for putting his life in danger.

mysterion

Posts : 358
Reputation : 11
Join date : 2013-11-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by PeterMac on 08.12.13 16:59

Hilariously, the mad woman from Scotland, Hereditary Chief of the Clan McChild-Neglecters, denies that Tannerman / Crecheman is still there ! (I am NOT joking !)
You would think that she could negotiate her own version of McHoly Writ.
But perhaps she really does need professional help.

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by PeterMac on 08.12.13 17:02

@mysterion wrote:Tannerman has not been eliminated. He has almost been eliminated according to SY`s quote. The MET only believe they have identified him. Leaves room for the website to keep him and maintain credibility with their supporters around the world especially the ones that haven`t seen CW. If SY were running things TM would be helping them by showing Smithman. If SY were running things TM would be charged with obstructing an investigation by promoting false information about a former suspect and for putting his life in danger.
Almost eliminated.
What a wonderful expression. It could be used in so many ways.
Madeleine is almost still missing, The Fund is almost transparent,

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by tiny on 08.12.13 17:02

@aiyoyo wrote:
@tiny wrote:
@aiyoyo wrote:
@tiny wrote:You seriously don't believe what the fm webmaster said,why on earth would grange ask them to keep it there IF they are
no longer looking for him.
Why not?

As he said he's not privy to info from Grange Team. Why should he?  
And I believe neither would his paymaster, the Mccanns, be privy to it.  
The Police will do what they do and for all we know Mccanns found out about Crecheman just like us ie through the media.

All he did was follow his paymaster's instructions.    
I should think it's not his position to question the Mccanns what they want or don't want on their website.

Since Kate & Gerrry and relative forms half of the Trustees/Directors of the Fund, the pertinent question might be: are the rest of the independent (?) Trustees agreeable to this decision not to remove Tannerman in spite of Redwood's announcement?
  They are all collectively responsible for info on the "FindMadeleine" website.  
so you believe grange ask them to keep it there,although he has been eliminated,ok
You've lost me there?  Grange asked who?

 Sorry my mistake,i thought it read that grange had ask them to leave it there.also I didn't realize he had not been eliminated,as I thought I had read that he had.

tiny

Posts : 2274
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2010-02-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by margaret on 08.12.13 18:00

@mysterion wrote:Tannerman has not been eliminated. He has almost been eliminated according to SY`s quote. The MET only believe they have identified him. Leaves room for the website to keep him and maintain credibility with their supporters around the world especially the ones that haven`t seen CW. If SY were running things TM would be helping them by showing Smithman. If SY were running things TM would be charged with obstructing an investigation by promoting false information about a former suspect and for putting his life in danger.
Thanks, it's All in the wording l didn't realise he'd 'almost' been eliminated. 

However, l still don't think the mcs are in charge of anything at the moment, apart from their own story. big grin

margaret

Posts : 585
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-09-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 8 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum