The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Page 1 of 8 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

Post by sallypelt on 07.12.13 17:26

These are interesting tweets from Jon Tait.



 

  1. [ltr]jontaito[/ltr]23m
    4/4 #mccann pic.twitter.com/Y55KDIiSNF






     Expand
[color][font]
  • Jon Tait ‏[ltr]@jontaito[/ltr]23m
    3/4 #mccann pic.twitter.com/gRaYQTOkBK






     Expand
    [/font][/color][color][font]
  • Jon Tait ‏[ltr]@jontaito[/ltr]23m
    2/4 #mccann pic.twitter.com/Vpqco5iCLT






     Expand
    [/font][/color]
    Jon Tait ‏[ltr]@jontaito[/ltr]24m
    Interesting email exchange with OFM webmaster, backs up what @trulyjudy73 said last week. #mccann 1/4 pic.twitter.com/T84gjwesrO






    One will have to read the tweets for themselves, as I don't know how to copy and paste the full text.

    Here is the link:

    https://twitter.com/jontaito


  • sallypelt

    Posts : 3305
    Reputation : 524
    Join date : 2012-11-10

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by margaret on 07.12.13 18:06

    Thanks sallypelt and well done for asking Jon Tait.  Wonder WHO told that person 'NOT' to remove tanner man from the site?

    margaret

    Posts : 585
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2010-09-24

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by NickE on 07.12.13 18:13

    They probably trying to draw attention away from the "GM" e-fit to the non existent "Tannerman ".

    NickE

    Posts : 916
    Reputation : 217
    Join date : 2013-10-27
    Age : 41

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by tiny on 07.12.13 18:20

    You seriously don't believe what the fm webmaster said,why on earth would grange ask them to keep it there IF they are
    no longer looking for him.

    tiny

    Posts : 2274
    Reputation : 1
    Join date : 2010-02-03

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by ultimaThule on 07.12.13 18:30

    Twitter is abuzz with predictions of impending doom for dvTM which seems to be heading for the rocks.

    O to be a fly on the wall in Rothley Towers...

    Blacksmith has been channelling Peter Cook http://blacksmithbureau.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/notebook.html?m=1 and I'm channelling Mel & Griff http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psqQR_AnGJM big grin

    ultimaThule

    Posts : 3355
    Reputation : 2
    Join date : 2013-09-18

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Bishop Brennan on 07.12.13 18:39

    @margaret wrote:Thanks sallypelt and well done for asking Jon Tait.  Wonder WHO told that person 'NOT' to remove tanner man from the site?
    You could say that the McCanns have banked everything on Tannerman being the abductor.  Right from the start, he was the one displayed in the press / PR conferences / website / media.  Gerry even remembers feeling that Tannerman was hiding in the apartment with him.  Jane was distraught at having seen the abductor with Maddie.  It happened at a time when Gerry was chatting with Jez, and Kate was at the bar.  

    If Tannerman is not the abductor - and the abduction took place much later, then nobody has an alibi (and Gerry now becomes the last person to see Maddie alive).  This is not part of the script which up till now had a very simple narrative.  No, without Tannerman we are in uncharted and uncertain waters.   The natural reaction from TM would be to hunker down and stick to the original story. Stick hard until you cannot any longer. 

    And for now - we just have Redwood's statement on Crimewatch - a statement which may well have caught the McCanns completely by surprise. They knew about the efits - but did they know that Tannerman was to be removed on-air from the story?  I suspect not.

    They (like us) may wonder if "crecheman" really does exist.  Perhaps they hope he doesn't.   So for now - keep a hold of Tannerman, and tell the webmaster (an employee and possibly a relative) to leave the site unchanged.  Makes sense to me.

    Bishop Brennan

    Posts : 695
    Reputation : 217
    Join date : 2013-10-27

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Jontait on 08.12.13 9:58

    It does open a can of worms, doesn't it? I woke this morning to a VERY angry email from the webmaster, berating me for posting our correspondence online.

    Jontait

    Posts : 19
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2013-12-01

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Smokeandmirrors on 08.12.13 10:17

    @Jontait wrote:It does open a can of worms, doesn't it? I woke this morning to a VERY angry email from the webmaster, berating me for posting our correspondence online.
    Welcome aboard Jon welcome2 

    D'you fancy posting that email too? My, they do get their knickers in a twist with all their anomalies don't they? How they do hate questions!

    ____________________
    The truth will out.

    Smokeandmirrors
    Moderator

    Posts : 2428
    Reputation : 5
    Join date : 2011-07-31

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Guest on 08.12.13 10:26

    I'd love to know who the webmaster actually is....are we really in the presence of McCann royalty?

    Guest
    Guest


    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Angelique on 08.12.13 10:26

    Jontait

    A big welcome from me to the forum.

    I wonder why they are so coy about information regarding the site - they seem to be keen to advertise in other areas.


    ____________________
    Things aren't always what they seem

    Angelique

    Posts : 1396
    Reputation : 35
    Join date : 2010-10-19

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by tiny on 08.12.13 10:27

    @Jontait wrote:It does open a can of worms, doesn't it? I woke this morning to a VERY angry email from the webmaster, berating me for posting our correspondence online.
    If the mccanns have nothing to hide then they have nothing to fear,post the reply you got from the webmaster just to let them know you don't like cover ups,

    tiny

    Posts : 2274
    Reputation : 1
    Join date : 2010-02-03

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Jontait on 08.12.13 10:50

    Not sure how to post pic from iPhone. Here is the text:

    Wish I hadn't responded to you. How dare you post my Emails without my permission. I responded to your questions in good faith and you in turn posted my replies on that horrible Controversy page.

    If you have any other questions, go to the Grange team. I will not respond to you further!

    Jontait

    Posts : 19
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2013-12-01

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Jontait on 08.12.13 10:52

    To which I replied:

    Yes. Sorry about that.

    I think it's important to get the truth out there.

    None of your personal details have been compromised.

    You were only following orders. People can now discuss WHOSE orders you were following.

    I have emailed Operation Grange with my concerns.

    All the best, and sorry once again for misleading you.

    Jon

    Ps I hope you are able to resolve your migratory issues with Google Checkout. I have been assured the switchover should only take 1 hour, not 15 (and counting) days. Plus the 6 months notice you were given should've provided ample time to switch.

    Just a thought. Bye now!

    Jontait

    Posts : 19
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2013-12-01

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Smokeandmirrors on 08.12.13 11:07

    Thanks Jon.

    It would seem that even thought your correspondence was not controversial, anything that people actually wish to ask rather than wait to be told, seems to provoke anger. Now, if everything was just so "normal" why would a question be so threatening to Team McCann?

    They really have got to get the message that THEY want public support, but only if no-one questions anything, and that is simply hypocritical and one sided. 

    Have they really no understanding that it is their own behaviour and stance that creates doubt?

    After six and a half years, it seems they really are too dim to get the message.

    ____________________
    The truth will out.

    Smokeandmirrors
    Moderator

    Posts : 2428
    Reputation : 5
    Join date : 2011-07-31

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by sami on 08.12.13 11:08

    It seems to have been taken very personally by the webmaster/mistress, whoever they might be !

    sami

    Posts : 962
    Reputation : 48
    Join date : 2012-04-08

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by chillyheat on 08.12.13 11:13

    Is there a way to find out who the webmaster is ?

    chillyheat

    Posts : 814
    Reputation : 1
    Join date : 2013-10-15

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by chillyheat on 08.12.13 11:22



    Shows they are desperate to STILL have Tannerman and Smithman as one......The Smith sighting shown here. They show the child being carried the same way as Tannerman, when clearly the Smiths said the child was being carried over the shoulder.

    chillyheat

    Posts : 814
    Reputation : 1
    Join date : 2013-10-15

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Mirage on 08.12.13 11:23

    @Jontait wrote:Not sure how to post pic from iPhone. Here is the text:

    Wish I hadn't responded to you. How dare you post my Emails without my permission. I responded to your questions in good faith and you in turn posted my replies on that horrible Controversy page.

    If you have any other questions, go to the Grange team. I will not respond to you further!
    What an oddly emotional response from a webmaster. And so early on a Sunday morning too.

    Webmasters conjure up James Bond figures for me, sequestered away, pressing buttons. Just the mechanics of the show really. 

    I noticed it wasn't the Metropolitan Police or Operation Grange, but the equivalent of a Christian name diminutive 'Grange' to whom you were directed. Almost affectionate I thought.

    Did they supply a hotline through?

    Questions questions. The everyday stuff of management. All in all, not an issue for a master to get his web in a tangle about.

    ____________________
    Kate McCann: "It's too 'ot. Give 'im a minute."

    Mirage

    Posts : 1665
    Reputation : 382
    Join date : 2013-02-01

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Jontait on 08.12.13 11:26

    They did supply tel no & email yesterday. I opted to email so as to keep the phonelines free for any important calls! I await a reply from Op Grange

    Jontait

    Posts : 19
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2013-12-01

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by ultimaThule on 08.12.13 11:27

    No Fate Worse Than De'Ath wrote:I'd love to know who the webmaster actually is....are we really in the presence of McCann royalty?
    Shall we curtsey? scratchhead   nah I reckon it's Mr Greenink whose monitoring is ultra vigilant these days - the wagons have been circled and he's been tasked with looking out for the first sign of a fleet of black marias coming over them thar hills surrounding Rothley Towers.

    welcome Jontait - and way to go! clapping 

    TrulyAwful was up twittering at the crack of dawn this morning.  That's 3 days running her knickers have worked their way up to her neck but, sadly, not yet around it.

    ultimaThule

    Posts : 3355
    Reputation : 2
    Join date : 2013-09-18

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Mirage on 08.12.13 11:32

    @Jontait wrote:They did supply tel no & email yesterday. I opted to email so as to keep the phonelines free for any important calls! I await a reply from Op Grange
    Well done. And thank you too.

    You mustn't put yourself down though, Jontait! Yours could be the call that supplies that missing piece of the jigsaw TM have been sitting on  looking for, for 6.5 years.  dance

    ____________________
    Kate McCann: "It's too 'ot. Give 'im a minute."

    Mirage

    Posts : 1665
    Reputation : 382
    Join date : 2013-02-01

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by margaret on 08.12.13 11:35

    @Jontait wrote:Not sure how to post pic from iPhone. Here is the text:

    Wish I hadn't responded to you. How dare you post my Emails without my permission. I responded to your questions in good faith and you in turn posted my replies on that horrible Controversy page.

    If you have any other questions, go to the Grange team. I will not respond to you further!
    Awwww get them all high and mighty. spit coffee 

    Was this the same people that blacksmith posted about earlier in the year? The webmaster was going to clarify something with 'Kate' then denied doing so once blacksmith had shown up their lies.

    Well done Jon and welcome. thumbsup

    margaret

    Posts : 585
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2010-09-24

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by jeanmonroe on 08.12.13 11:40

    I posted this December 3rd 2013.

    WHO WILL TAKE RESPONSIBILITY IF SOMEBODY GETS 'ATTACKED'?

    McCANNS OR SY/MET POLICE?

    WHY are the Met/SY still allowing the McCanns to portray 'Creche/Tannerman' on their website after they, SY/Met have publicly DISMISSED him as of importance?

    http://www.findmadeleine.com/campaigns/unidentified_people.html

    FIFTY (50) days after DCI Andy Redwood 'eliminated' 'him' as relevent to investigation!

    What IF 'somebody saw somebody' dressed in similar clothing, as Creche/Tannerman, in the street, today . tomorrow, next week and 'attacked/tried to arrest' him as the possible 'abductor' of Madeleine McCann?

    Are SY/Met/ DCI Redwood going to take responsibility for that assault, they could have obviously 'prevented' by instructing the McCanns to STOP 'promoting' a 'suspect' they have dismissed?

    Or is it the case, that SY/Met were TOLD, of a 'possible assault' (worse case scenario, death, like the recent case in Bristol)
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-25122280
    but, ignored the warning, and will 'apologise' AFTER an 'event' with 'we were told this might be a possibility due to our decision to leave a false suspect on our clients website.We'll refer ourselves to the IPCC and lessons will be learn't'

    WHY are SY/Met allowing the McCanns to 'display' a 'suspect' and possibly put at risk an 'innocent' man, Christmas shopping with his young, blonde daughter, DCI Redwood has dismissed publicly?

    METROPOLITAN POLICE, DCI REDWOOD, AS OF TODAY, 3RD DECEMBER 2013..........................................YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD!

    jeanmonroe

    Posts : 5133
    Reputation : 886
    Join date : 2013-02-07

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by Mirage on 08.12.13 11:55

    @jeanmonroe wrote:I posted this December 3rd 2013.

    WHO WILL TAKE RESPONSIBILITY IF SOMEBODY GETS 'ATTACKED'?

    McCANNS OR SY/MET POLICE?

    WHY are the Met/SY still allowing the McCanns to portray 'Creche/Tannerman' on their website after they, SY/Met have publicly DISMISSED him as of importance?

    http://www.findmadeleine.com/campaigns/unidentified_people.html

    FIFTY (50) days after DCI Andy Redwood 'eliminated' 'him' as relevent to investigation!

    What IF 'somebody saw somebody' dressed in similar clothing, as Creche/Tannerman, in the street, today . tomorrow, next week and 'attacked/tried to arrest' him as the possible 'abductor' of Madeleine McCann?

    Are SY/Met/ DCI Redwood going to take responsibility for that assault, they could have obviously 'prevented' by instructing the McCanns to STOP 'promoting' a 'suspect' they have dismissed?

    Or is it the case, that SY/Met were TOLD, of a 'possible assault' (worse case scenario, death, like the recent case in Bristol)
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-25122280
    but, ignored the warning, and will 'apologise' AFTER an 'event' with 'we were told this might be a possibility due to our decision to leave a false suspect on our clients website.We'll refer ourselves to the IPCC and lessons will be learn't'

    WHY are SY/Met allowing the McCanns to 'display' a 'suspect' and possibly put at risk an 'innocent' man, Christmas shopping with his young, blonde daughter, DCI Redwood has dismissed publicly?

    METROPOLITAN POLICE, DCI REDWOOD, AS OF TODAY, 3RD DECEMBER 2013..........................................YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD!
    Yes, it could lead to a serious assault IMO, jeanmonroe. This is too high profile a case for it not to be a real possibility.

     This, along with the muddle being created in the search for MM by her family's own dedicated website, makes it imperative that someone sorts this out immediately.

     I've never heard of a precedent for such flagrant thumbing at a MET investigation - and flaunted in everyone's faces too. As a taxpayer, I want to know why it is being tolerated.

     Remind me, what is the cost of this mammoth investigation (inc CW) to date?

    Over to you Grange.

    ____________________
    Kate McCann: "It's too 'ot. Give 'im a minute."

    Mirage

    Posts : 1665
    Reputation : 382
    Join date : 2013-02-01

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Re: Webmaster told not to remove Tannerman

    Post by oakeso on 08.12.13 12:07

    @ChillyHeat wrote:Is there a way to find out who the webmaster is ?
    I think it's an apprentice webmaster who hasn't quite mastered the online store (donations) or linking (book linking to poster page) as yet.

    ____________________
    “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” 

    oakeso

    Posts : 62
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2013-10-11
    Location : The cellar - looking for NZ labels

    View user profile

    Back to top Go down

    Page 1 of 8 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

    View previous topic View next topic Back to top


     
    Permissions in this forum:
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum