The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

Thanks to Kitti.

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Thanks to Kitti.

Post by jeanmonroe on 20.11.13 11:05

kitti Today at 7:34 am
.There's one big problem....the files.

Every person they have dug up, has been dug up before and they think we have forgotten about these people...rehashing old stories won't work, so where are they going to find someone that either was in the files and been interviewed and overlooked or some person that was never their but could be a suspect !

Where?

Now....i will tell you why I think there is a big coverup and deadwood has been sent in to do it..

Man seen on beach.......remember him, the one with the stance....now go look at the SY crime watch programme at 22 mins onwards....same profile.....why have SY so blatantly lied.

Put the two men together.....

http://www.mccannfiles.com/imagelib/sitebuilder/misc/show_image.html?linkedwidth=actual&linkpath=http://www.mccannfiles.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/tannercoopercomp.jpg&target=tlx_picbdpz




Beach man...2010

Now go to the SY recon at 22.30...-and yes same man.

Total crock off shit.

SY think we are thick.

Kitti is my STAR of the week!

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5133
Reputation : 886
Join date : 2013-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by jeanmonroe on 20.11.13 11:33



CW 'crecheman' CLEARED by Redwood.

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5133
Reputation : 886
Join date : 2013-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by MarleneP on 20.11.13 12:02

As I understand the "Beach man" from a video is identical with the Tanner man.

In Crime Watch this image was shown as a man who has been found. A father who has brought his child from the nursery.

MarleneP

Posts : 110
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-10-27

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by Over The Hill on 20.11.13 12:12

Forgive me if I've misunderstood, JeanM, but is that video still from PdL in May 2007?

Over The Hill

Posts : 82
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-11-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by jeanmonroe on 20.11.13 12:39

@Over The Hill wrote:Forgive me if I've misunderstood, JeanM, but is that video still from PdL in May 2007?
COOPERMAN

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/175407/Madeleine-McCann-Is-this-the-man-who-snatched-her

http://gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/37may10/EXPRESS_16_05_10.htm

COOPERMAN!

http://gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/SUSPECTS.htm

TAKE YOUR PICK!

At LEAST 21 'suspects' to choose from! (so far!)



21 ne'er-do-wells  all in PDL but the McCanns did NOT 'see' any of them!

But 'everyone' else DID!

No wonder they had to book up the tapas in advance, they would never have got in with all these 'suspects' trying to hog all the tables!

eta: NOT a black face amongst them!

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5133
Reputation : 886
Join date : 2013-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by Over The Hill on 20.11.13 12:52

So was Det Redwood on the the Crimewatch programme implying that the real Tannerman (aka Crecheman) is the guy in the beach video still?
Sorry if I'm being a bit dim, this Beachman is a new thing altogether for me

Over The Hill

Posts : 82
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-11-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by MoonGoddess on 20.11.13 12:58

don't know if this might shed any light for people...

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/2010/05/madeleine-mccann-is-this-man-who.html

hope it doesn't further confuse lol

____________________
Not to help justice in her need would be an impiety ~Plato~

MoonGoddess

Posts : 282
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-09-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by aquila on 20.11.13 13:14

@Over The Hill wrote:So was Det Redwood on the the Crimewatch programme implying that the real Tannerman (aka Crecheman) is the guy in the beach video still?
Sorry if I'm being a bit dim, this Beachman is a new thing altogether for me
Don't worry Over The Hill, you're not dim, neither are most people with an IQ with a measurement above their waistline.

You are witnessing a spectacular extravaganza of treating you like a moron with no ability to think for yourself. You have a gutter press (I'm surprised they bother to write anymore, it would be better to do it cartoon fashion - they're almost there) fed by a media machine of press releases from their bosom buddies to titilate you and get your heart all mush that there is something of human interest and to be outraged by foreign buggers who do it to one of ours.

You also have the most extraordinary CrimeWatch programme in its history - from Scotland Yard!

Oh no, you're not a moron by any means. You're being treated like one imo.

aquila

Posts : 7953
Reputation : 1174
Join date : 2011-09-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by jeanmonroe on 20.11.13 13:17

@Over The Hill wrote:So was Det Redwood on the the Crimewatch programme implying that the real Tannerman (aka Crecheman) is the guy in the beach video still?
Sorry if I'm being a bit dim, this Beachman is a new thing altogether for me
With regards to Redwood.

to use Gerry's words 'I'm not going to comment on that'

This was when they were trying to find a patsy to match JT's 'sighting' to prove their 'abduction' THEORY.

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5133
Reputation : 886
Join date : 2013-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by Over The Hill on 20.11.13 21:15

But if the guy in the video really is an innocent father (aka Tannerman/Crecheman) as mentioned by Det Redwood on Crimewatch, he would have been in PdL at the time, wouldn't he? Therefore he might have been caught in someone's video

Having said that, I'd be surprised at such a revelation, since I assumed he didn't actually exist

Over The Hill

Posts : 82
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-11-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by SixMillionQuid on 21.11.13 18:24

@jeanmonroe wrote:
http://www.mccannfiles.com/imagelib/sitebuilder/misc/show_image.html?linkedwidth=actual&linkpath=http://www.mccannfiles.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/tannercoopercomp.jpg&target=tlx_picbdpz




Beach man...2010

Now go to the SY recon at 22.30...-and yes same man.

Total crock off shit.

SY think we are thick.

Kitti is my STAR of the week!
I remember this guy from the daily express. A Gail Cooper classic!
*link already provided*

SixMillionQuid

Posts : 436
Reputation : 7
Join date : 2013-10-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by Guest on 21.11.13 19:07

SY really have taken the p*** censored

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by Guest on 04.12.13 9:09

But if Crecheman=Tannerman=Cooperman 

http://gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/SUSPECTS.htm

Then he does exist. 
And can then possibly sue.

I just don't understand how SY can present a photograph of a man 6 years later looking exactly like the one Gail Cooper photographed.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/175407/Madeleine-McCann-Is-this-the-man-who-snatched-her

Is Crecheman Cooperman? Is Tannerman Cooperman? Is Crecheman Tannerman?
I give up, I think I will need professional help soon...

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by PeterMac on 04.12.13 10:23

dantezebu wrote:
I just don't understand how SY can present a photograph of a man 6 years later looking exactly like the one Gail Cooper photographed.
Why not ?
They are still using a 7 year old photo of Madeleine.

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by Angelique on 04.12.13 10:46

But I think that this is all done on purpose. 

Tannerman, Crecheman and Cooperman - anyman, in fact. 

They want us to GO AWAY or to put it even more bluntly, they want us to ask them to stop wasting our money. 

I think they are doing it on purpose. 

The only reason I can think of for the outrageously un-CrimeWatch programmes in the UK, Germany, etc are simply to garner funds. This is what I have been saying. I don't believe they are ever, ever, going to accuse anyone of anything because they want no action or investigation. 

IMO its all about money for the Fund. 

I hope sincerely I am wrong and that they will eventually do the right thing and find out the Truth for Madeleine's sake but I just can't see it. 

Maybe 20 years or so ago SY may have meant something but now IMO they are just a waste of space.

____________________
Things aren't always what they seem

Angelique

Posts : 1396
Reputation : 35
Join date : 2010-10-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Thanks to Kitti.

Post by suzyjohnson on 04.12.13 18:56

@Over The Hill wrote:But if the guy in the video really is an innocent father (aka Tannerman/Crecheman) as mentioned by Det Redwood on Crimewatch, he would have been in PdL at the time, wouldn't he? Therefore he might have been caught in someone's video

So far, so good

But ..........

Express, May 2010, 

Mrs Cooper, of Newark, Nottinghamshire, said last night: “I am 98 per cent certain the man in the photo was the same man who made the strange visit to our ­holiday villa. His hair looks neater in the photo, but he is quite far in the background.” 

So, when he wasn't walking on the beach or collecting his child from the creche (on holiday), Cooperman / Tannerman was calling at villas collecting money for orphanages was he?      

____________________


suzyjohnson

Posts : 1004
Reputation : 132
Join date : 2013-03-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum