5TH NOVEMBER TRIAL UPDATES - Please post here

aquila wrote:There is only one trial going on at the moment.

It's yet another libel trial.

I see no point in discussing anything other than this.

Dissecting the stuff that's put out in the media isn't important. The result of this libel trial most definitely is to my mind the most significant thing.

I'm content to wait and see what happens.

stillsloppingout wrote:The site is monitored , when something ANTI is posted, they either get told internally to remove it ,or more than likely an Email from the media monitoring dept of one of there bank of Lawyers , to the Mail .

 Tip as the Mail online is ran by journo students most aged about 19 . you have to be cute with your posts . because 

1 They don't have the wit to understand . and 

2  It gets your comment's passed the sensors .

  good luck .  remember the ppl watching the site, the world started in 1995 !!!!

Searcher wrote:

stillsloppingout wrote:The site is monitored , when something ANTI is posted, they either get told internally to remove it ,or more than likely an Email from the media monitoring dept of one of there bank of Lawyers , to the Mail .

 Tip as the Mail online is ran by journo students most aged about 19 . you have to be cute with your posts . because 

1 They don't have the wit to understand . and 

2  It gets your comment's passed the sensors .

  good luck .  remember the ppl watching the site, the world started in 1995 !!!!

Just a small note; I do happen to know that no journo can walk into the Mail, aged 19 or not; it is a tough process to be part of a team there, and they have very good, capable staff reporters.

stillsloppingout wrote:

Searcher wrote:

stillsloppingout wrote:The site is monitored , when something ANTI is posted, they either get told internally to remove it ,or more than likely an Email from the media monitoring dept of one of there bank of Lawyers , to the Mail .

 Tip as the Mail online is ran by journo students most aged about 19 . you have to be cute with your posts . because 

1 They don't have the wit to understand . and 

2  It gets your comment's passed the sensors .

  good luck .  remember the ppl watching the site, the world started in 1995 !!!!

Just a small note; I do happen to know that no journo can walk into the Mail, aged 19 or not; it is a tough process to be part of a team there, and they have very good, capable staff reporters.

 Just to clarify 
The Mail online is MOSTLY  staffed by junior's who update the site ,and provide quite a lot of the [ crappy ] content by trawling the internet . the Daily Mail still has its good reporters many who daily provide content for the Online edition . BTW the online pic rates are £ 30 , first pic £ 20 ,then  £ 10 . so three pics £ 60 . !!!!!

MaryB wrote:There doesn't seem to be any news of exactly what was said at the trial yesterday.  Except on this thread lots of stuff about who staffs the Mail comments.  Am I the only one who couldn't care less about who staffs the DM comment section.

mouse wrote:Didn't know where to put this - but just now in PMQ's 'Angela Smith' I believe Labour - asked a question of the PM live in the house as to why Ben Needhams family have not had the same sort of backing/investigation like the Mccanns.

Cherry Blossom wrote:

mouse wrote:Didn't know where to put this - but just now in PMQ's 'Angela Smith' I believe Labour - asked a question of the PM live in the house as to why Ben Needhams family have not had the same sort of backing/investigation like the Mccanns.

Mouse, Just posted in the Ben Needham Thread

mouse wrote:

Cherry Blossom wrote:

mouse wrote:Didn't know where to put this - but just now in PMQ's 'Angela Smith' I believe Labour - asked a question of the PM live in the house as to why Ben Needhams family have not had the same sort of backing/investigation like the Mccanns.

Mouse, Just posted in the Ben Needham Thread

Ta for that

Cristobell wrote:Does anyone know if Isabel Duarte was at Court yesterday?

sami wrote:

Cristobell wrote:Does anyone know if Isabel Duarte was at Court yesterday?

I would like to know this also cristobell

bellum wrote:

sami wrote:

Cristobell wrote:Does anyone know if Isabel Duarte was at Court yesterday?

I would like to know this also cristobell

it makes three of us.

Cristobell wrote:

bellum wrote:

sami wrote:

Cristobell wrote:Does anyone know if Isabel Duarte was at Court yesterday?

I would like to know this also cristobell

it makes three of us.

I've tried all the usual sources, but can't find an answer.  I thought it significant that she was absent for the last session - she looked as though she was heading for a nervous breakdown.

The Rooster wrote:I posted a comment on the Daily Mail this morning, it would have been the second, but it was WHOOSHED.  It wasn't even given the light of day. Not contentious, certainly no more than their article about the adorable cushion and its pin.  Anyway, comment or no comment, I commend the Daily Mail for it's reporting of the libel trial in Lisbon.

The Rooster wrote:I posted a comment on the Daily Mail this morning, it would have been the second, but it was WHOOSHED.  It wasn't even given the light of day. Not contentious, certainly no more than their article about the adorable cushion and its pin.  Anyway, comment or no comment, I commend the Daily Mail for it's reporting of the libel trial in Lisbon.

Cristobell wrote:

bellum wrote:

sami wrote:

Cristobell wrote:Does anyone know if Isabel Duarte was at Court yesterday?

I would like to know this also cristobell

it makes three of us.

I've tried all the usual sources, but can't find an answer.  I thought it significant that she was absent for the last session - she looked as though she was heading for a nervous breakdown.

• Executive Member
  
• 
  
• 
  
• Posts: 4842
  
  

Cristobell wrote:

The Rooster wrote:I posted a comment on the Daily Mail this morning, it would have been the second, but it was WHOOSHED.  It wasn't even given the light of day. Not contentious, certainly no more than their article about the adorable cushion and its pin.  Anyway, comment or no comment, I commend the Daily Mail for it's reporting of the libel trial in Lisbon.

Same here Rooster, my factual, non libellous comment didn't appear either.

I have to say, that having seen the distinct lack of media coverage for the #MillionMaskMarch globally, my faith in the 'authorities' dwindles.  If all the television networks and newspapers throughout the world can boycott such a major event, the McCann case pales in comparison.  I hope I am wrong, but if I'm not, I'm buying a Guy Fawkes mask and marching next November 5th!