The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

NEW EVIDENCE

Page 1 of 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

NEW EVIDENCE

Post by PeterMac on 10.10.13 21:18

They have New Evidence.
They have used this New Evidence to make a reconstruction,
This reconstruction may have been made as long ago as 6 months.
During that time neither the parents, their PIs, nor the Police in any country have acted on the New Evidence, to try to find the abductor
During that time neither the parents, their PIs, nor the Police in any country have acted on the New Evidence, to try to find Madeleine

Do we really believe this ?
Are we really expected to believe this ?

Do you not remember all those court-room dramas where the detective said "acting on information received I did . . . ."
IF Grange had any useful information they would have acted on it the same day, Detectives would have worked long hours of overtime - possibly for no pay,
and brought in the abductor and rescued Madeleine.
I have seen it.
One of the most difficult tasks for an SIO is to get the lads to Go Home !

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by sallypelt on 10.10.13 21:20

@PeterMac wrote:They have New Evidence.
They have used this New Evidence to make a reconstruction,
This reconstruction may have been made as long ago as 6 months.
During that time neither the parents, their PIs, nor the Police in any country have acted on the New Evidence, to try to find the abductor
During that time neither the parents, their PIs, nor the Police in any country have acted on the New Evidence, to try to find Madeleine

Do we really believe this ?
Are we really expected to believe this ?

Do you not remember all those court-room dramas where the detective said "acting on information received I did  . . . ."
IF Grange had any useful information they would have acted on it the same day, Detectives would have worked long hours of overtime - possibly for no pay,
and brought in the abductor and rescued Madeleine.
I have seen it.
One of the most difficult tasks for an SIO is to get the lads to Go Home !
SY has been working on this investigation since May 2011. Why NOW, in the middle of a libel case, are they doing the Crimewatch programme right in the middle of it? Wendy Murphy has hit the nail right on the head.

sallypelt

Posts : 3298
Reputation : 518
Join date : 2012-11-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by galena on 10.10.13 21:44

@PeterMac wrote:They have New Evidence.
They have used this New Evidence to make a reconstruction,
This reconstruction may have been made as long ago as 6 months.
During that time neither the parents, their PIs, nor the Police in any country have acted on the New Evidence, to try to find the abductor
During that time neither the parents, their PIs, nor the Police in any country have acted on the New Evidence, to try to find Madeleine

Do we really believe this ?
Are we really expected to believe this ?

Do you not remember all those court-room dramas where the detective said "acting on information received I did  . . . ."
IF Grange had any useful information they would have acted on it the same day, Detectives would have worked long hours of overtime - possibly for no pay,
and brought in the abductor and rescued Madeleine.
I have seen it.
One of the most difficult tasks for an SIO is to get the lads to Go Home !
It seems to me that the main focus of the investigation is not to find Madeleine alive or dead, or to bring anyone to justice it is to find another bogeyman to create reasonable doubt in the minds of the public  that she WAS abducted and didn't die in the apartment.

galena

Posts : 286
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2013-09-23

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by stillsloppingout on 10.10.13 21:46

It's taken 6 months , as that is the usual time scale to write a convincing soap opera . Nothing more nothing less. 

It will once again drum home the biggest pieces of mis' direction . the alleged evening of the 3rd of May , and the unlocked apartment .

stillsloppingout

Posts : 489
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2013-02-06
Location : N WEST ENGLAND

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by tasprin on 10.10.13 21:53

Yes Peter, Scotland have important new evidence in the case of a missing child and instead of acting on it, they've sat on it for weeks/months and waited for an opportune moment to broadcast it to the nation via a Crimewatch "special".

tasprin

Posts : 834
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-01-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Seek truth on 10.10.13 21:58

@sallypelt wrote:
@PeterMac wrote:They have New Evidence.
They have used this New Evidence to make a reconstruction,
This reconstruction may have been made as long ago as 6 months.
During that time neither the parents, their PIs, nor the Police in any country have acted on the New Evidence, to try to find the abductor
During that time neither the parents, their PIs, nor the Police in any country have acted on the New Evidence, to try to find Madeleine

Do we really believe this ?
Are we really expected to believe this ?

Do you not remember all those court-room dramas where the detective said "acting on information received I did  . . . ."
IF Grange had any useful information they would have acted on it the same day, Detectives would have worked long hours of overtime - possibly for no pay,
and brought in the abductor and rescued Madeleine.
I have seen it.
One of the most difficult tasks for an SIO is to get the lads to Go Home !
SY has been working on this investigation since May 2011. Why NOW, in the middle of a libel case, are they doing the Crimewatch programme right in the middle of it?  Wendy Murphy has hit the nail right on the head.
True.

But at the same time, this crime watch reconstruction proves the book did not hinder the search. the mccanns are wrong about amarals book stopping the search, how can they win the case?

Seek truth

Posts : 447
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2013-06-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Dr What on 10.10.13 22:03

At a time when the reputation of the UK Police is so low, why on earth are they risking heaping more ridicule on themselves in this way.

After all this time, they still have not eliminated the parents from the investigation, yet are prepared to look stupid by chasing shadows and appear on camera offering their support to the people who first and foremost, they should be investigating.

Very odd.

Dr What

Posts : 241
Reputation : 17
Join date : 2012-10-26

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Harriet94 on 10.10.13 22:19

Scotland Yard also appear to be showing a  complete lack of interest in child safeguarding and protection. Can you imagine the outcry if Social Services had spent 2 YEARS reviewing case files of a child at risk? IMO they  must know Madeleine is at risk of no further harm or they would have acted sooner IMO.

Harriet94

Posts : 137
Reputation : 10
Join date : 2012-05-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by tasprin on 10.10.13 22:26

Seems the BBC/Scotland Yard will be attempting to brainwash the nation big brother style

“The BBC will run 30-second clips of Kate and Gerry throughout the day and night to promote the Crimewatch re-examination of the Madeleine case" Jerry Lawton, The Star.

tasprin

Posts : 834
Reputation : 4
Join date : 2013-01-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by russiandoll on 10.10.13 22:52

Kate and Gerry won't necessarily be seen doing the same thing, but maybe doing a variety of things, so it does not get boring.

 Like showing curtains open and closed at the same time.
 How closed curtains can go whoosh
 Going in simultaneously through front and back doors.

 Telling people their children are unattended.
 Leaving their apartment unlocked

 Looking every night in the children's room and only looking in once on 3rd.

 Signing a child out of crèche when you are out on a run.

 Checking your children's breathing but not getting them to a hospital where they can have a proper assessment of their level of consciousness and a blood test to check for sedatives.

 Hearing Gerry say he thought they might not be able to get into the tapas that evening, while reading at the same time that it had been block -booked for the week.




 Ok BBC just show on a loop the pair eating and making merry with a child crying in the background, with a clock showing the passage of 90 minutes alongside a voiceover  " We were checking every half hour "

 I will watch that on a loop.

____________________



             The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate,
contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and
unrealistic.
~John F. Kennedy


russiandoll

Posts : 3942
Reputation : 7
Join date : 2011-09-11

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by nobodythereeither on 10.10.13 22:58

@tasprin wrote:Seems the BBC/Scotland Yard will be attempting to brainwash the nation big brother style

“The BBC will run 30-second clips of Kate and Gerry throughout the day and night to promote the Crimewatch re-examination of the Madeleine case" Jerry Lawton, The Star.
Throughout the bloody day and night????

How often, exactly??

And what will these 30-second clips "of Kate and Gerry" consist of??

Showing Kate's (non) answers to the 48 questions?

Showing Gerry standing in front of the (non) jemmied shutters?

Showing them both jogging and playing tennis after their daughter disappeared?

Or what???

nobodythereeither

Posts : 273
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-11-26

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Nina on 10.10.13 23:09

Has anyone ever seen the like of this before? 30 second clips throughout the day and night. This is brain washing, propaganda.

____________________
Not one more cent from me.

Nina

Posts : 2626
Reputation : 215
Join date : 2011-06-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Guest on 10.10.13 23:20

Even by the normal standards of the media's lovefest with the McCanns, this is bizarre!

Maybe the trailers will be shown between every programme?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Nina on 10.10.13 23:28

I asked hubby, who is approaching his 80th birthday if he had ever seen the like and he said the nearest he could think would be if a senior member of the Royal family were in a very bad state of health and bulletins were being posted, or war was about to be announced.

____________________
Not one more cent from me.

Nina

Posts : 2626
Reputation : 215
Join date : 2011-06-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Truthandjustice on 10.10.13 23:31

It's extraordinary really, I mean how many Brit potential witnesses were on holiday in PDL at the time to warrant such TV media saturation over here and absolutely NONE in Portugal.  It comes across as a propaganda exercise.

Truthandjustice

Posts : 237
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2013-09-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Guest on 10.10.13 23:34

Yes, I remember my mother telling me about the increasingly ominous reports about the health of George V who died in 1936.

The aim can only be to reinforce the idea that the McCanns are as pure as the driven slush - sorry, I mean snow - in the hope that the Portuguese judiciary will fall into line.

In your dreams, BBC!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by ShuBob on 10.10.13 23:41

The adverts have started. It was just shown on BBC1 after Question Time.

ShuBob

Posts : 1893
Reputation : 57
Join date : 2012-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Pinktulips on 10.10.13 23:46

The advert MUST be a shot in the foot because Kate basically said "We did nothing wrong..." That must anger 99% of the population whether you believe the abduction crap or not. It was totally YUCKY whatever you think!

Pinktulips

Posts : 9
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Newintown on 10.10.13 23:49

@ShuBob wrote:The adverts have started. It was just shown on BBC1 after Question Time.
Unfortunately I've just seen it as well.  Flashes of the "incident room", Kate McCann looking the poor bereft Mother with her usual whiney voice, Deadwood saying "it was a revelation".  He didn't go on to say what was a revelation, no doubt we'll have to wait until Monday, so will poor little Madeleine before the cavalry are sent out to rescue her.  What a load of old BS (that doesn't stand for Blacksmith, by the way). 

The flashes of what's to come made the opening scenes of CSI look boring.  smilie

____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........

"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"


Newintown

Posts : 1597
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2011-07-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Woofer on 10.10.13 23:54

@Pinktulips - yes, I agree - all this propaganda is going to cause more anger.

Even if the McCanns were innocent, this amount of establishment support is not normal.

This has got to be someone or some people, extremely powerful being protected. It does not make sense otherwise.

____________________
The constant assertion of belief is an indication of fear - Jiddu Krishnamurti

Woofer

Posts : 3390
Reputation : 12
Join date : 2012-02-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by MRNOODLES on 11.10.13 0:03

@Nina wrote:Has anyone ever seen the like of this before? 30 second clips throughout the day and night. This is brain washing, propaganda.
Just shown it after QuestionTime... AAAhhhhhh puke  KM had tears down her face blubbing about the nasty accusations.

MRNOODLES

Posts : 637
Reputation : 200
Join date : 2013-07-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Newintown on 11.10.13 0:07

@Nina wrote:Has anyone ever seen the like of this before? 30 second clips throughout the day and night. This is brain washing, propaganda.
Even when Millie Dowler, Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman all went missing there were no Crimewatch 30 second clips being played throughout the day and night, so why for the McCanns after 6 years. 

There is something very sordid and underhand going on here.  The level of publicity overload and brainwashing of the public is unprecedented.

____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........

"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"


Newintown

Posts : 1597
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2011-07-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by Guest on 11.10.13 0:07

I shan't be watching anything on BBC1 for the next few days!

Maybe, just maybe, the aim of the BBC is to make everyone sick to death of the sight of Kate and lose what sympathy they might have had for her.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by juliet on 11.10.13 0:22

Is it possible that there is a panic on? The libel case is going badly. Newspapers may be telling Cameron that for every pro Mccann comment there are 50 sceptics..which they don't print. And now a Fox news program is used to tell what people really think!! I think Murdoch might he breaking ranks. Don't forget the Sun and that very telling "outrageous Amaral" spread.

juliet

Posts : 579
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2011-06-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: NEW EVIDENCE

Post by sonic72 on 11.10.13 0:35

Why are they holding back this 'new evidence' and saving it for Crimewatch?

If it existed they'd tell us now, not keep us guessing until a TV show is aired!

October 14th 2013 - WORLD PREMIER - NEW EVIDENCE!

What a load of cobblers! laughat

____________________


sonic72

Posts : 337
Reputation : 64
Join date : 2012-09-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum