The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Page 4 of 13 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11, 12, 13  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

UNASHAMEDLY pinched from the MM site as being a matter of considerable interest.

Post by PeterMac on 23.09.13 21:55

From MM.
with acknowledgements for good work.
http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t24316p585-lisbon-libel-trial-mccanns-v-amaral

***** wrote:
interested wrote:
Congratulations to "*****" on the superbly worded enquiry addressed to the North Yorkshire Police regarding any investigation into the alleged threat to the McCann children.  (page 35 of this topic)

Eagerly awaiting the Police response!!!
Sat, 13:38 Message starred Thank You for contacting North Yorkshire Police
FROM General Enquiries TO You
Show Details
From
General Enquiries
Thank you for contacting North Yorkshire Police. Your e mail has been received into the General Enquiries e mail Box.

14:59 Message starred RE: Your investigation into McCann twins 'threat' [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED]
FROM General Enquiries TO You + 1 More
Show Details
From
General Enquiries
CC
DBS Unit
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Dear ********
I have forwarded your email to our Disclosure Unit for attention and action as necessary. They will no doubt be contacting you in due course.
Regards

Jim ****
Collar No ****
On behalf of General Enquiries In Box
Force Control Room XN
North Yorkshire Police
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

From:****@yahoo.com]
Sent: 21 September 2013 13:32
To: General Enquiries
Subject: Your investigation into McCann twins 'threat'
Dear Sir/ Madam,
Mr Michael Wright, of Skipton, has stated publicly, in an open court, that the North Yorkshire Police 'investigated' several people in connection with a 'threat' to the McCann family twins.
Please could you confirm that what Mr Wright has stated is true, and that people were 'interviewed' by your force in relation to a specific 'threat'?
Mr Wright has also said that North Yorkshire Police interviewed him about this.
Mr Wright has stated that the threat originated from the now closed 3 Arguidos website forum.
Do you have an incident number for the investigation your force carried out , as Mr Wright has said, into the 'threat' to the McCann children.?
Do you also have an incident report number in relation to Mr G McCann's reporting to the North Yorkshire Police about the same specific threat to his children?
Has North Yorkshire Police retained specific information, in a very important complaint, that will confirm Mr McCann's and Mr Wright's claims are true?
Do i have to compose a Freedom of Information request to receive the information i have asked?
Yours faithfully.

*****************************************************************************************
Internet email is not to be treated as a secure means of communication.
North Yorkshire Police monitors all internet email activity and content.
This communication is intended for the addressee(s) only.
Please notify the sender if received in error. Unauthorised use or
disclosure of the content may be unlawful. Opinions
expressed in this document may not be official policy.
Thank you for your co-operation.

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by russiandoll on 23.09.13 21:55

ID - Have you read the criminal investigation Report?
MW says he didn't read it all, he read the conclusions.
.......

.....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.

ID - Why?
MW The PJ Report made after Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the inquiry and after the McCanns were made arguidos concludes that there was no evidence that they were involved.

ID - This means that the book doesn't correspond with the investigation facts?


 WHY when MW states that he has only read the conclusions of the reports does ID then ask him about the investigation, something he knows nothing about?
 ID refers to FACTS in GA 's book and FACTS in the investigation. If they are both factual, how can they be contradictory?
 She establishes herself that both are factual then later tries to point to one being factual and the other not.

 I have a headache.

____________________



             The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate,
contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and
unrealistic.
~John F. Kennedy


russiandoll

Posts : 3942
Reputation : 7
Join date : 2011-09-11

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by ultimaThule on 23.09.13 22:14

@PeterMac wrote:
@Portia wrote:
@ShuBob wrote:I'm happy that the notes have been appended to evidence presented to the court. I should imagine it'll make for interesting reading especially the bits highlighted in green ink big grin
notme
The glorious thing is that he got caught out when the judge recognised that the paper wasn't standard file paper from the UK, or anywhere else, and he had to admit it was from the hotel.
Written the night before ? ?
In consultation with KM ? ?
Or with ID ? ? ?
Or both ? ? ?
If not - Kevin - how would he know what he had to write down ?  How did he know what the answers were supposed to be to questions which had not yet been put, so that he could underline them in GREEN.

He couldn't even try to pretend that these were "professionally prepared case notes from years ago".
No. They were written the previous evening IN THE HOTEL.

Brilliant work Madam Judge !

I cannot wait to see her comments about that in the written judgment.
Or indeed to listen to the lawyers for the 4 respondents in their final addresses.
Presumably the defendants will be calling witnesses prior to their respective lawyers' closing speeches, which I assume will occur after ID has made her submissions on behalf of the plaintiffs?  

From what appears to have taken place to date it seems to me TM have made the case for the defence.

The sheer arrogance of the McScams is breathtaking.  Did they seriously think all they had to do was turn up at court, pass go, and collect 1.2 million euros? 

At least cousin Michael was caught bang to rights in the middle of his 'spontaneous' and 'unscripted' testimony.  Any MSM reporting of that little incident? [doesn't hold breath emoticon]

ultimaThule

Posts : 3355
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2013-09-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Newintown on 23.09.13 22:27

@russiandoll wrote:ID - Have you read the criminal investigation Report?
MW says he didn't read it all, he read the conclusions.
.......

.....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.

ID - Why?
MW The PJ Report made after Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the inquiry and after the McCanns were made arguidos concludes that there was no evidence that they were involved.

ID - This means that the book doesn't correspond with the investigation facts?


 WHY when MW states that he has only read the conclusions of the reports does ID then ask him about the investigation, something he knows nothing about?
 ID refers to FACTS in GA 's book and FACTS in the investigation. If they are both factual, how can they be contradictory?
 She establishes herself that both are factual then later tries to point to one being factual and the other not.

 I have a headache.
Hasn't it been mentioned elsewhere on these postings that the Judge said upon questioning one of the witnesses that the the Public Prosecutor(?) was of the opinon that there was no evidence one way or the other to establish what happened to Madeleine?

(Sorry it's very late so my brain is not functioning properly)

So whatever MW said is irrelevant if we are going by what the Judge stated to another witness.

____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........

"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"


Newintown

Posts : 1597
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2011-07-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by PeterMac on 23.09.13 22:29

@russiandoll wrote:ID - Have you read the criminal investigation Report?
MW says he didn't read it all, he read the conclusions.
.......
.....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.
ID - Why?
MW The PJ Report made after Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the inquiry and after the McCanns were made arguidos concludes that there was no evidence that they were involved.
ID - This means that the book doesn't correspond with the investigation facts?

 WHY when MW states that he has only read the conclusions of the reports does ID then ask him about the investigation, something he knows nothing about?
 ID refers to FACTS in GA 's book and FACTS in the investigation. If they are both factual, how can they be contradictory?
 She establishes herself that both are factual then later tries to point to one being factual and the other not.
 I have a headache.
My reading of this is that ID is STAGGERINGLY inept, to the extent that she should have an official complaint made against her by the McCanns with a view to striking her off.  

She is asking questions which allow the witness to give her an answer she did not want.   This is a most basic and fundamental error.
She then asks questions which lead the witness into answers which are patently and PROVABLY nonsense, or false.
The one about the report after GA was removed refers clearly to the Interim report which concluded exactly the opposite of what MW stated.    He had obviously not read it, but had been told a lie by the McCanns, to the effect that it concluded that there was no evidence they were involved. Which is, as we know what they have told the world. Despite its being a LIE - KEVIN.

How wrong / stupid / blind is it possible to be.
The interim report - for the benefit of KEVIN and any pros watching - says this.
From everything that we have discovered, our files result in the following conclusions:

A. the minor Madeleine McCann died in Apartment 5A at the Ocean Club resort in Praia da Luz, on the night of 3 May 2007
B. a simulation - a staged hoax - of an abduction took place
C. in order to render the child’s death impossible before 10.00pm, a situation of checking of the McCann couple’s children while they slept was concocted
D. Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann are involved in the concealment of the corpse of their daughter, Madeleine McCann
E. at this moment, there seems to be no strong indications that the child’s death was other than the result of a tragic accident, yet;
From what has been established up to now, everything indicates that the McCann couple, in self-defence, did not want to deliver up Madeleine’s corpse immediately and voluntarily, and there is a strong possibility therefore that it was moved from the initial place where she died. This situation may raise questions concerning the circumstances in which the death of the child took place.
BIG LETTERS FOR THE HARD OF UNDERSTANDING ! ! !

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by ShuBob on 23.09.13 22:39

I've suggested before that Isabel Duarte may want out and is doing all she can to either force the McCanns to withdraw before the case concludes or the judge throws it out. I cannot believe she's even trying to defend their corner.

ShuBob

Posts : 1893
Reputation : 57
Join date : 2012-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Newintown on 23.09.13 22:42

@PeterMac wrote:
@russiandoll wrote:ID - Have you read the criminal investigation Report?
MW says he didn't read it all, he read the conclusions.
.......
.....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.
ID - Why?
MW The PJ Report made after Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the inquiry and after the McCanns were made arguidos concludes that there was no evidence that they were involved.
ID - This means that the book doesn't correspond with the investigation facts?

 WHY when MW states that he has only read the conclusions of the reports does ID then ask him about the investigation, something he knows nothing about?
 ID refers to FACTS in GA 's book and FACTS in the investigation. If they are both factual, how can they be contradictory?
 She establishes herself that both are factual then later tries to point to one being factual and the other not.
 I have a headache.
My reading of this is that ID is STAGGERINGLY inept, to the extent that she should have an official complaint made against her by the McCanns with a view to striking her off.  

She is asking questions which allow the witness to give her an answer she did not want.   This is a most basic and fundamental error.
She then asks questions which lead the witness into answers which are patently and PROVABLY nonsense, or false.
The one about the report after GA was removed refers clearly to the Interim report which concluded exactly the opposite of what MW stated.    He had obviously not read it, but had been told a lie by the McCanns, to the effect that it concluded that there was no evidence they were involved.  Which is, as we know what they have told the world.   Despite its being a LIE - KEVIN.

How wrong / stupid / blind is it possible to be.
The interim report - for the benefit of KEVIN and any pros watching - says this.
From everything that we have discovered, our files result in the following conclusions:

A. the minor Madeleine McCann died in Apartment 5A at the Ocean Club resort in Praia da Luz, on the night of 3 May 2007
B. a simulation - a staged hoax - of an abduction took place
C. in order to render the child’s death impossible before 10.00pm, a situation of checking of the McCann couple’s children while they slept was concocted
D. Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann are involved in the concealment of the corpse of their daughter, Madeleine McCann
E. at this moment, there seems to be no strong indications that the child’s death was other than the result of a tragic accident, yet;
From what has been established up to now, everything indicates that the McCann couple, in self-defence, did not want to deliver up Madeleine’s corpse immediately and voluntarily, and there is a strong possibility therefore that it was moved from the initial place where she died. This situation may raise questions concerning the circumstances in which the death of the child took place.
BIG LETTERS FOR THE HARD OF UNDERSTANDING ! ! !
Thank you PeterMac, I posted a few minutes before you.  I thought I was having a "senior moment", but you put into words more than I could say; we were both thinking along the same lines though!  yes

____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........

"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"


Newintown

Posts : 1597
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2011-07-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Newintown on 23.09.13 22:48

@ShuBob wrote:I've suggested before that Isabel Duarte may want out and is doing all she can to either force the McCanns to withdraw before the case concludes or the judge throws it out. I cannot believe she's even trying to defend their corner.
Perhaps she's woken up and realised that all those friends she lost and who were against her in taking on this case were right in the first place.

Oh dear.  laughat

____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........

"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"


Newintown

Posts : 1597
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2011-07-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by sammyc on 23.09.13 22:49

@greenink2L1 has been pestering kikoratton (dewi lennard) on Twitter.  Kiko tweets on Sept 12 that 'this tit (@greenink2L1) might be Gerry'.  Apologies, don't know how to show the link.  By the way, Kikoratton has been stating his theory for a long time now on how Madeleine has disappeared and asking the McCanns to sue him for his views but they won't go near him or his fellow tweeters .  So why Gerry and Kate  have you targeted Tony Bennett and Goncalo Amaral?

sammyc

Posts : 218
Reputation : 49
Join date : 2011-10-06
Location : UK

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Woofer on 23.09.13 22:50

And the Judge has commented "We don`t know what happened".

____________________
The constant assertion of belief is an indication of fear - Jiddu Krishnamurti

Woofer

Posts : 3390
Reputation : 12
Join date : 2012-02-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Guest on 23.09.13 22:51

@sammyc wrote:@greenink2L1 has been pestering kikoratton (dewi lennard) on Twitter.  Kiko tweets on Sept 12 that 'this tit (@greenink2L1) might be Gerry'.  Apologies, don't know how to show the link.  By the way, Kikoratton has been stating his theory for a long time now on how Madeleine has disappeared and asking the McCanns to sue him for his views but they won't go near him or his fellow tweeters .  So why Gerry and Kate  have you targeted Tony Bennett and Goncalo Amaral?
This is kiko's twitter account https://twitter.com/kikoratton

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Woofer on 23.09.13 23:03

The Wright Stuffed by Dr. Martin Roberts

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id232.html

Admin - please delete if already been posted.

Woofer

Posts : 3390
Reputation : 12
Join date : 2012-02-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by plebgate on 23.09.13 23:22

hi 
Just wanted to say hi to Kevin and Michael, that's right, Michael who admits that he keeps an eye on internet forums to report back to Mr. & Mrs.

eyebrows 


plebgate

Posts : 5441
Reputation : 1156
Join date : 2013-02-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Harriet94 on 23.09.13 23:48

Does anyone else here remember Jim Gamble being interviewed on television with the McCanns? It was the time of the release of the viral video which if I remember correctly was an appeal to the perpertrators and featured age progression photographs of Madeleine and footage of the aeroplane steps at East Midlands Airport. He was explaining to Philip Schofield that the 'perpertrator would be constantly monitoring the internet to get updates on the case. I wondered at the time which internet sites Jim Gamble meant.  Here perhaps?

Harriet94

Posts : 137
Reputation : 10
Join date : 2012-05-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by ultimaThule on 24.09.13 1:02

@plebgate wrote:hi 
Just wanted to say hi to Kevin and Michael, that's right, Michael who admits that he keeps an eye on internet forums to report back to Mr. & Mrs.

eyebrows 

What a simply topping idea, plebgate smilie
Joins Mexican wave to Kev & Michael Mrs Mr

Borrows refrain from well-known owner of Portuguese vineyard and sings 'Congratulations' to cousin Mike for his hapless unpolished spin  performance in the witness box titter 

 

ultimaThule

Posts : 3355
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2013-09-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Hobs on 24.09.13 2:47

....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.


The addition of qualifiers ( words that when removed, do not change the meaning of the sentence) weaken the statement.

A strong reply would have been a simple no, here it is weaked by the qualifiers in no way.
No is repeated twice making it sensitive.

It is worth noting that facts is mentioned twice making it sensitive to ID.

There are facts reported in his book and facts of the investigation.

If they are facts then it is proven and provable information and evidence.

What facts are there in the book that do not allegedly correspond to the investigation?

There are facts reported by Goncalo Amaral which tells us they are true in relation to the investigation and thus Madeleine McCanns disappearance and the involvement of her parents.

This phrase is unexpected since if he was libelling them as claimed then i would expect to see words such as alleged, claimed etc implying said facts were untrue. and thus libellous.

It can't be libel if the said facts are true!

If said reported facts in no way correspond to the facts of the investigation, the question then becomes what do the facts of the investigation conclude and how do they differ from the facts in the book, given he had access to all the facts of the investigation in his role as lead detective.

The facts of the investigation conclude the mccanns cannot be cleared of involvement, at this moment in time there is not even proof what particular crime or crimes have been committed and by whom.
 The facts based on evidence so far uncovered indicate a death in the apartment 5a , there is probably concealment of a corpse and the filing of a false police report re: abduction.
The investigation at this time cannot  decide if it was homicide, accidental homicide or even accidental death , leaving all option open as to cause of death.

Goncalo allows for an accidental death, in effect minimising their role in what happened.

I would be asking for examples of where the facts differ and their implications for the mccanns.

If the facts in no way match between book and investigation, then the book and the investigation should be diametrically opposite in every way, the facts should be mutually exclusive, either it is this or it is that, it can't be both since they would then correspond which you said the in no way do.

What say you to this?

____________________
The little unremembered acts of kindness and love are the best parts of a person's life.

Hobs

Posts : 712
Reputation : 282
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 52
Location : uk

View user profile http://tania-cadogan.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by aiyoyo on 24.09.13 3:15

@russiandoll wrote:We really have entered the Twilight Zone.....what was this aide memoire for ?  Dates? Specifics ? The type of thing you can get confused.


 No...............ID - When they learnt about it, how did they react? Was it sadness or pain? Were they socially and professionally affected?

GA's lawyer, SO, interrupts asking the Judge to ask the witness what is the paper he is reading.

MW says that they are notes about feelings, etc. to remember.

The Judge asks what is actually in the notes.
MW repeats that it is to help him remember

feelings and special contacts.
He's creep .  The  Judge saw through that,
He's one of the kevins, as are other family members and friends monitoring forum (fora) for the mccanns.
That came right out of the horse's mouth, proving people right all along about trolls.
Creepy kate could also be one of them (troll).

Keeping contact nr and dates on note maybe, but FEELINGS?
The note is his script, preplanned, prepared in advance with help.
Premeditated witness testimony loses credence. His deviousness was noted by other party and judge so another own goal for team Mccann.

The judge is sharp, nothing escapes her......  
Should be another field day when other family members come on.
Surely cast from each of Kate & Gerry side will come on stage (court) to continue with this tale before the saga is over.......,,,,

Ye Gawd. what a deluded bunch they're.....contrive from start to finish.

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by aiyoyo on 24.09.13 3:25

@Portia wrote:
@russiandoll wrote:We really have entered the Twilight Zone.....what was this aide memoire for ?  Dates? Specifics ? The type of thing you can get confused.


 No...............ID - When they learnt about it, how did they react? Was it sadness or pain? Were they socially and professionally affected?

GA's lawyer, SO, interrupts asking the Judge to ask the witness what is the paper he is reading.

MW says that they are notes about feelings, etc. to remember.

The Judge asks what is actually in the notes.
MW repeats that it is to help him remember

feelings and special contacts.
Which apparently he couldn't memorise himself, when told of them; so was forced to write them down in order to be prepared;

this in the hotel where he was/is (?) staying. Where is GM staying these days, btw? Do we know?

No Court in the world will OK a witness's reading out his notes
No Court in the world will consider as *evidence* note not submitted in advance for perusal.
His testimony will be heavily discounted, if considered at all.

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by aiyoyo on 24.09.13 3:34

@PeterMac wrote:From MM.
with acknowledgements for good work.
http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t24316p585-lisbon-libel-trial-mccanns-v-amaral

***** wrote:
interested wrote:
Congratulations to "*****" on the superbly worded enquiry addressed to the North Yorkshire Police regarding any investigation into the alleged threat to the McCann children.  (page 35 of this topic)

Eagerly awaiting the Police response!!!
Sat, 13:38 Message starred Thank You for contacting North Yorkshire Police
FROM General Enquiries TO You
Show Details
From
General Enquiries
Thank you for contacting North Yorkshire Police. Your e mail has been received into the General Enquiries e mail Box.

14:59 Message starred RE: Your investigation into McCann twins 'threat' [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED]
FROM General Enquiries TO You + 1 More
Show Details
From
General Enquiries
CC
DBS Unit
Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Dear ********
I have forwarded your email to our Disclosure Unit for attention and action as necessary. They will no doubt be contacting you in due course.
Regards

Jim ****
Collar No ****
On behalf of General Enquiries In Box
Force Control Room XN
North Yorkshire Police
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

From:****@yahoo.com]
Sent: 21 September 2013 13:32
To: General Enquiries
Subject: Your investigation into McCann twins 'threat'
Dear Sir/ Madam,
Mr Michael Wright, of Skipton, has stated publicly, in an open court, that the North Yorkshire Police 'investigated' several people in connection with a 'threat' to the McCann family twins.
Please could you confirm that what Mr Wright has stated is true, and that people were 'interviewed' by your force in relation to a specific 'threat'?
Mr Wright has also said that North Yorkshire Police interviewed him about this.
Mr Wright has stated that the threat originated from the now closed 3 Arguidos website forum.
Do you have an incident number for the investigation your force carried out , as Mr Wright has said, into the 'threat' to the McCann children.?
Do you also have an incident report number in relation to Mr G McCann's reporting to the North Yorkshire Police about the same specific threat to his children?
Has North Yorkshire Police retained specific information, in a very important complaint, that will confirm Mr McCann's and Mr Wright's claims are true?
Do i have to compose a Freedom of Information request to receive the information i have asked?
Yours faithfully.

*****************************************************************************************
Internet email is not to be treated as a secure means of communication.
North Yorkshire Police monitors all internet email activity and content.
This communication is intended for the addressee(s) only.
Please notify the sender if received in error. Unauthorised use or
disclosure of the content may be unlawful. Opinions
expressed in this document may not be official policy.
Thank you for your co-operation.
I await with baited breath reply from the NY Police.
But this is a moot point where the Judge is concerned as did she not already thrown this out as having no relevance to the case.

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by aiyoyo on 24.09.13 3:56

@PeterMac wrote:
@russiandoll wrote:ID - Have you read the criminal investigation Report?
MW says he didn't read it all, he read the conclusions.
.......
.....ID - Do the facts reported by Gonçalo Amaral in his book and in the documentary correspond to the facts of the investigation?
MW says "no", in no way.
ID - Why?
MW The PJ Report made after Gonçalo Amaral was removed from the inquiry and after the McCanns were made arguidos concludes that there was no evidence that they were involved.
ID - This means that the book doesn't correspond with the investigation facts?

 WHY when MW states that he has only read the conclusions of the reports does ID then ask him about the investigation, something he knows nothing about?
 ID refers to FACTS in GA 's book and FACTS in the investigation. If they are both factual, how can they be contradictory?
 She establishes herself that both are factual then later tries to point to one being factual and the other not.
 I have a headache.
My reading of this is that ID is STAGGERINGLY inept, to the extent that she should have an official complaint made against her by the McCanns with a view to striking her off.  

She is asking questions which allow the witness to give her an answer she did not want.   This is a most basic and fundamental error.
She then asks questions which lead the witness into answers which are patently and PROVABLY nonsense, or false.
The one about the report after GA was removed refers clearly to the Interim report which concluded exactly the opposite of what MW stated.    He had obviously not read it, but had been told a lie by the McCanns, to the effect that it concluded that there was no evidence they were involved.  Which is, as we know what they have told the world.   Despite its being a LIE - KEVIN.

How wrong / stupid / blind is it possible to be.
The interim report - for the benefit of KEVIN and any pros watching - says this.
From everything that we have discovered, our files result in the following conclusions:

A. the minor Madeleine McCann died in Apartment 5A at the Ocean Club resort in Praia da Luz, on the night of 3 May 2007
B. a simulation - a staged hoax - of an abduction took place
C. in order to render the child’s death impossible before 10.00pm, a situation of checking of the McCann couple’s children while they slept was concocted
D. Dr Gerald McCann and Dr Kate McCann are involved in the concealment of the corpse of their daughter, Madeleine McCann
E. at this moment, there seems to be no strong indications that the child’s death was other than the result of a tragic accident, yet;
From what has been established up to now, everything indicates that the McCann couple, in self-defence, did not want to deliver up Madeleine’s corpse immediately and voluntarily, and there is a strong possibility therefore that it was moved from the initial place where she died. This situation may raise questions concerning the circumstances in which the death of the child took place.
BIG LETTERS FOR THE HARD OF UNDERSTANDING ! ! !
ID has been a naughty girl, despite been warned by Judge to desist from posing this type of question, she ignored the Judge when she tries to put words in MW's mouth.  

It's crass incompetence from ID, since Kevin admitted he did not read the files, only the conclusions of Final Report ( selectively)  how can he possibly give her a reply she coveted.

ETA: best part is Kevin already been told screenshots cannot form evidence.

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by aiyoyo on 24.09.13 4:06

@Woofer wrote:And the Judge has commented "We don`t know what happened".
And, the conclusion inconclusive......

Yet, that does not stop Mccanns telling the world they were exonerated.......

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by aiyoyo on 24.09.13 4:35

@plebgate wrote:hi 
Just wanted to say hi to Kevin and Michael, that's right, Michael who admits that he keeps an eye on internet forums to report back to Mr. & Mrs.

eyebrows 

Oh, we knew that since 3As that he did that for Mr&Mrs.
Question is who else is in his team? Philo? Kate? Gerry? Isabel Hudson?


aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by lj on 24.09.13 4:39

deleted

____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?"  Gerry

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/?m=0

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

lj

Posts : 3275
Reputation : 148
Join date : 2009-12-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by aiyoyo on 24.09.13 4:50

@ultimaThule wrote:
@plebgate wrote:hi 
Just wanted to say hi to Kevin and Michael, that's right, Michael who admits that he keeps an eye on internet forums to report back to Mr. & Mrs.

eyebrows 

What a simply topping idea, plebgate smilie
Joins Mexican wave to Kev & Michael Mrs Mr

Borrows refrain from well-known owner of Portuguese vineyard and sings 'Congratulations' to cousin Mike for his hapless unpolished spin  performance in the witness box titter 

 
W..right giving all the W rong stuff in Court......
Caught with stained green fingers...still wet from green ink!big grin 

Can it get any worst?

He's biggest *catch-of-the-day* (thus far) for Court for spouting a tidal wave of lies...
.....and the Judge noted he's family member......

He should be nominated for the "Talented Liar" Award, unless someone breaks his record.....yes 


aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by ultimaThule on 24.09.13 5:13

@aiyoyo wrote:
@russiandoll wrote:We really have entered the Twilight Zone.....what was this aide memoire for ?  Dates? Specifics ? The type of thing you can get confused.


 No...............ID - When they learnt about it, how did they react? Was it sadness or pain? Were they socially and professionally affected?

GA's lawyer, SO, interrupts asking the Judge to ask the witness what is the paper he is reading.

MW says that they are notes about feelings, etc. to remember.

The Judge asks what is actually in the notes.
MW repeats that it is to help him remember

feelings and special contacts.
He's creep .  The  Judge saw through that,
He's one of the kevins, as are other family members and friends monitoring forum (fora) for the mccanns.
That came right out of the horse's mouth, proving people right all along about trolls.
Creepy kate could also be one of them (troll).

Keeping contact nr and dates on note maybe, but FEELINGS?
The note is his script, preplanned, prepared in advance with help.
Premeditated witness testimony loses credence. His deviousness was noted by other party and judge so another own goal for team Mccann.

The judge is sharp, nothing escapes her......  
Should be another field day when other family members come on.
Surely cast from each of Kate & Gerry side will come on stage (court) to continue with this tale before the saga is over.......,,,,

Ye Gawd. what a deluded bunch they're.....contrive from start to finish.
For the benefit of cousin Michael, may I recommend blood money red for clarity when preparing aides de memoir memory helpers before any further court proceedings you may be called on to attend and testify? 

Do please feel free to pass this handy tip on to any of your relatives who are awaiting their moment in the spotlight opportunity to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth - and may their god not have mercy on their souls if they don't   yes   

ultimaThule

Posts : 3355
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2013-09-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 4 of 13 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11, 12, 13  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum