The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Page 10 of 13 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by sallypelt on 25.09.13 15:39

@windchime wrote:
candyfloss wrote:Very interesting thread, am I reading this right, he spent 10 weeks in PDL?





 10:30pm The testimony as it happens...

The first witness of the session is Michael Wright, an administrator, whose wife is Kate McCann's cousin. He has known Kate since she was ten years of age and Gerald McCann since 2001. They used to have regular contact.

He went to PDL in May 2007 and many times during that summer (10 weeks). Since the McCanns returned to the UK, he visits them regularly. They spent the first Christmas without Madeleine together. He tries to give them some comfort and calls or e-mails or sends sms messages at least once a week.
Time in PDL


05/05 - 11/05  - 7 days
14/05 - 18/05  - 5 days
08/06 - 13/06  - 6 days
12/07 - 13/07  - 2 days
22/08 - 01/09  - 11 days
07/09 - 09/09  - 2 days

It would appear that MW is able to drop everything and book a flight the day before for most of these visits!!??



So, MW was in Portugal on the 7th to the 9th of September yet he became a secretary and a director of a company on the dates he was in Portugal. How strange.
CITY CENTRAL (LEEDS) RTM COMPANY LIMITED Unknown Company Secretary 07/09/2007 01/03/2010 - BUY NOW
SNAPCOUNT (UK) LIMITED Active - Accounts Filed Director 14/12/2004 15/01/2011 - BUY NOW
DNA PAYMENTS LIMITED Company is dissolved Company Secretary 18/09/2007 - 01/2011 BUY NOW
DNA PAYMENTS LIMITED Company is dissolved Director 18/09/2007 - 01/2011 BUY NOW

sallypelt

Posts : 3305
Reputation : 524
Join date : 2012-11-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by sallypelt on 25.09.13 15:46

A bit more info on DNA Company Ltd. Dissolved in Jan 2011. I wonder if there is any significance in the timing?

DNA PAYMENTS LIMITED

Company Number06373609
Status Dissolved Incorporation Date18 September 2007 (about 6 years ago)Dissolution Date18 January 2011
Company TypePrivate Limited
CompanyJ urisdictionUnited KingdomRegistered Address
PICKERING HOUSE,
40A YORK PLACE, LEEDS, WEST YORKSHIRE
ENGLAND
LS1 2ED
United Kingdom
Directors/ Officers
inactive MICHAEL TERENCE WRIGHT, secretary, 18 Sep 2007-
inactive CHRISTOPHER DAVID SPRACKLEN, director, 18 Sep 2007-
inactive ANTHONY PAUL WALTON, director, 18 Sep 2007-
inactive MICHAEL TERENCE WRIGHT, director, 18 Sep 2007-
Registry Pagehttp://data.companieshouse.gov.uk/doc...

sallypelt

Posts : 3305
Reputation : 524
Join date : 2012-11-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Guest on 25.09.13 15:46

@sallypelt wrote:And here is information for ALARIC SYSTEMS LIMITED, for those who want to go through the directors etc. Michael Wright doesn't appear to have ever been a director of this company, but  who is HEATHER ANN LAZARUS? She resigns as soon as she's appointed, but the reason I am slightly interested in this person is her  registered address is in SWANSEA. Didn't Kate have a Swansea number on her mobile for the night of the 3rd May? Or is this just another coincidence? Worth checking out if it's only to eliminate.
***
I found other companies, where she also was appointed and resigned on the same day. Often in combination with a Harry Pierre Lazarus, who's registered in the same address in Swansea. Sometimes also in an additional combination with a Peter Harry William Lazarus ... Doesn't have to have a meaning, but it's indeed a bit "strange".

I don't see a  line to the McCanns c.s., though. So, until we find something more concrete, perhaps rather not discuss.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Praiaaa on 25.09.13 16:03

When you start a company, you usually buy a company 'off the shelf' and than change the name. So very normal for people to be appointed as directors and resign as directors on the same day - they are employees of the company's whose business it is to set up shell companies for that purpose - there is nothing sinister in that.
For example - I decide to set up a hairdressing business.
I go to a specialist company which has a 'ready made' company called 'Ubuz Ltd' I pay the fee, they change the name to 'Hairdos' (my chosen name) and appoint one of themselves as a director, then resign and appoint me as a director. Very normal, nothing sinister...

Praiaaa

Posts : 419
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2011-04-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Guest on 25.09.13 16:03

I think she must be a solicitor or something, who's appointed on the board at the time a company is registered for the mere purpose of legal registration and then resigns straight away. Anyway the list on the link is rather impressive: http://www.companydirectorcheck.com/heather-ann-lazarus

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Guest on 25.09.13 16:04

SNAP, Praaia big grin 

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Praiaaa on 25.09.13 16:06

big grin 

Praiaaa

Posts : 419
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2011-04-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by tigger on 25.09.13 16:13

Kate or Gerry must have called Anne Marie Wrights' mother between 22.00 and 23.00 as Michael Wright states in his rogatory interview:
I've only checked to 10.01 on the 4th. There are a number of sms's listed but not with a sender.


Thursday 3/5.
About 23:00 that night I received a very uncomfortable [or compelling] call from my wife's mother who told me about Madeleine's disappearance. We all thought that Madeleine was going to appear in the following hours, even while I drove Nora back to Liverpool in the early morning of Friday, 4 May. I stayed in Liverpool.

I spoke to Kate by phone between 10:00 and 11:00am that morning and she confirmed that she wanted her mother, her father and Nora with her. The family liaison [officer?] arranged the journey of the mother, father and Nora to Portugal that same afternoon.
unquote.

Question marks:
Liaison Officer? This early in the proceedings and how did he find out about this?
According to TB: both Aunt Nora and Susan Healy arrived mid to late afternoon, therefore his testimony is inaccurate.
http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t2270-madeleine-mccann-the-role-of-michael-wright?highlight=the+role+of+michael+wright

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.

tigger

Posts : 8112
Reputation : 24
Join date : 2011-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by jeanmonroe on 25.09.13 16:15

Oh dear, Mr Wrong isn't going to like the all 'threatening internet nasties' exposing his past, is he?
Still, it's all in the public domain, so no harm done to him.
But he still won't like it!
big grin big grin big grin big grin 

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5133
Reputation : 886
Join date : 2013-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by ShuBob on 25.09.13 16:18

As a media monitor for the couple was MW drawing a wage from the fund? I ask because I seem to remember that when the fund's first account was published, it revealed a huge amount had been spent on media monitoring.

ShuBob

Posts : 1893
Reputation : 57
Join date : 2012-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Guest on 25.09.13 16:18

Only those with a murky past and / or current dark secrets will be worried about what anyone says about them on the Internet.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by jeanmonroe on 25.09.13 16:20

"I spoke to Kate by phone between 10:00 and 11:00am that morning and she confirmed that she wanted her mother,"

That would be the mother she, KM, sent packing with a 'flea in her ear' and given very short shrift only hours after she arrived!

Something mummy asked her?

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5133
Reputation : 886
Join date : 2013-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by margaret on 25.09.13 16:27

@jeanmonroe wrote:"I spoke to Kate by phone between 10:00 and 11:00am that morning and she confirmed that she wanted her mother,"

That would be the mother she, KM, sent packing with a 'flea in her ear' and given very short shrift only hours after she arrived!

Something mummy asked her?
I've never heard that JM what happened!

margaret

Posts : 585
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-09-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by windchime on 25.09.13 16:29

@tigger wrote:Kate or Gerry must have called Anne Marie Wrights' mother between 22.00 and 23.00 as Michael Wright states in his rogatory interview:
I've only checked to 10.01 on the 4th. There are a number of sms's listed but not with a sender.


Thursday 3/5.
About 23:00 that night I received a very uncomfortable [or compelling] call from my wife's mother who told me about Madeleine's disappearance. We all thought that Madeleine was going to appear in the following hours, even while I drove Nora back to Liverpool in the early morning of Friday, 4 May. I stayed in Liverpool.

I spoke to Kate by phone between 10:00 and 11:00am that morning and she confirmed that she wanted her mother, her father and Nora with her. The family liaison [officer?] arranged the journey of the mother, father and Nora to Portugal that same afternoon.
unquote.

Question marks:
Liaison Officer? This early in the proceedings and how did he find out about this?
According to TB: both Aunt Nora and Susan Healy arrived mid to late afternoon, therefore his testimony is inaccurate.
http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t2270-madeleine-mccann-the-role-of-michael-wright?highlight=the+role+of+michael+wright
Yes this is what is niggling me I cannot work out why Kate would tell MW that she wanted her mother, father and aunt to go straight out to see her.  Why not call your mum and tell her to get the first plane out to Portugal that they possibly could, why involve this husband of your cousin? 

If Mum, Dad and Aunt arrived in the afternoon then WHY are MW and Kate having a discussion regarding Kates desire for them to be with her as by this point they would have had to have been en route to the airport if not already there?

Tigger I agree at this point MBM could have easily turned up alive and well being found hiding somewhere for a little prank and fallen asleep there is surely no need for a Liaison officer?  Bloody hell what with Ambassadors, Sky TV, Liasion officers all arriving within 15 hours of MBMs absence you have to ask yourself - what the hell is going on here?

What a strange word to use to describe a phone call informing you that your (supposedly) close friends daughter had gone missing -'uncomfortable'  why would he feel uncomfortable?

windchime

Posts : 137
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2013-07-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by ShuBob on 25.09.13 16:35

Don't forget Kate's dad wasn't very well at the time. Why add to his stress given that Maddie could have turned up at any time?

And they wonder why people think they already knew Maddie won't be found alive from early on! They only have themselves to blame for people suspecting them of simulating an abduction. No one else!

ShuBob

Posts : 1893
Reputation : 57
Join date : 2012-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by jeanmonroe on 25.09.13 16:38

@margaret wrote:
@jeanmonroe wrote:"I spoke to Kate by phone between 10:00 and 11:00am that morning and she confirmed that she wanted her mother,"

That would be the mother she, KM, sent packing with a 'flea in her ear' and given very short shrift only hours after she arrived!

Something mummy asked her?
I've never heard that JM what happened!
Alright maragret, just a 'teaser'

on the Sunday evening. 6th May 2007, Gerry had gone round to one of the family containing apartments, something was said that annoyed him. Gerry’s mum says to Susan Healy “ Well Sue – it looks as though we’re on the Granny Express home.”

Now i'm not one to gossip, as you know winkwink winkwink winkwink 

Ok, tease over, here's the link.

http://steelmagnolia-mccannarchives.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/httpflossysplace.html

love 'her sourpuss face '

jeanmonroe

Posts : 5133
Reputation : 886
Join date : 2013-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Rufus T on 25.09.13 16:45

"I wasn't in Portugal on 3 May at the time of Madeleine's disappearance. About 23:00 that night I received a very uncomfortable [or compelling] call from my wife's mother who told me about Madeleine's disappearance. Aunt Nora, from Canada, was in Skipton and was about to return to Canada the next morning. I suggested that she go to Liverpool instead. We all thought that Madeleine was going to appear in the following hours, even while I drove Nora back to Liverpool in the early morning of Friday, 4 May. I stayed in Liverpool. I spoke to Kate by phone between 10:00 and 11:00am that morning and she confirmed that she wanted her mother, her father and Nora with her. The family liaison [officer?] arranged the journey of the mother, father and Nora to Portugal that same afternoon. I went with them to Manchester airport. Kate's mother asked me to come to Portugal and I agreed on condition of speaking first with Gerry and Kate."


Again from MW statement


Another coincidence, Aunt Nora ( Madeleine's godmother) just happens to be visiting. thinking 

Rufus T

Posts : 269
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-06-18
Location : Glasgow

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by aiyoyo on 25.09.13 16:53

I am absolutely certain that Kate and Gerry were not capable of hiding Madeleine's body and later transporting it to a dump.
IMO, MW's rog interview over explained, a sign of lying.

Who gave him that idea that she could have been taken to a dump?

Is that freudian slip?

Could that explain Gerry & Kate cocksure confidence her remains will never be found......not saying just saying.....?




aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by windchime on 25.09.13 16:54

@jeanmonroe wrote:
@margaret wrote:
@jeanmonroe wrote:"I spoke to Kate by phone between 10:00 and 11:00am that morning and she confirmed that she wanted her mother,"

That would be the mother she, KM, sent packing with a 'flea in her ear' and given very short shrift only hours after she arrived!

Something mummy asked her?
I've never heard that JM what happened!
Alright maragret, just a 'teaser'

on the Sunday evening. 6th May 2007, Gerry had gone round to one of the family containing apartments, something was said that annoyed him. Gerry’s mum says to Susan Healy “ Well Sue – it looks as though we’re on the Granny Express home.”

Now i'm not one to gossip, as you know winkwink winkwink winkwink 

Ok, tease over, here's the link.

http://steelmagnolia-mccannarchives.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/httpflossysplace.html

love 'her sourpuss face '
Can't say I have seen this before.  It really does give you a bigger insight into just how cold this family are.  My parents, 6 days after this would not have been able to speak!!  This woman appears even colder and more rehearsed than Kate!!  Is that why Kate wanted her to fly to Portugal - to tell her what to say?  I cannot believe some of the things she says especially this;
'it was difficult for K & G to get across to the PJ what they felt had happened'
surely it was up to the PJ to tell them what they thought had happened NOT the other way around. 
and don't forget ' yes, I've spoken to my daughter........' why not say Kate?  I sense a mother and daughter who are really not very close at all.
Such a cold interview - Madeleine is lovely - that's what Kate said.  Is that it?

windchime

Posts : 137
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2013-07-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by margaret on 25.09.13 17:03

]
@jeanmonroe wrote:"I spoke to Kate by phone between 10:00 and 11:00am that morning and she conf
on the Sunday evening. 6th May 2007, Gerry had gone round to one of the family containing apartments, something was said that annoyed him. Gerry’s mum says to Susan Healy “ Well Sue – it looks as though we’re on the Granny Express home.”

Now i'm not one to gossip, as you know winkwink winkwink winkwink 

Ok, tease over, here's the link.

http://steelmagnolia-mccannarchives.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/httpflossysplace.html

love 'her sourpuss
You're right! From Kate's book....


When it came to talking about it, however, we discovered that Alan, who had spent time with our friends and family as well as with us, had already broached this subject with them, which made it all much easier. Having said that, we ended up getting down to the nitty-gritty rather earlier than anticipated – that Sunday evening, in fact – and not in the way we had planned, either. Gerry had gone round to one of the other apartments our party was occupying, where apparently something was said that annoyed him, precipitating the discussion we’d intended to hold in a rather calmer atmosphere.
We can laugh about it now, but at the time, Gerry and I couldn’t laugh at anything. After the bombshell had been dropped, Gerry’s mum had turned to my mum and said, ‘Well, Sue – it looks as if we’re on the “Granny Express” home!’ We also heard that after Gerry left, there had been a few cracks about ‘Big Brother evictions’. However bleak the situation, whenever a roomful of Glaswegians and Liverpudlians is gathered together, you can guarantee some gallows humour will break through. Still, a decision had to be made and, as it turned out, it was the right one for everybody.

----

So was it 'easier than planned' but there was still a scene thanks to Gerrys temper.  

She refers to 'we'd intended to hold' but then says 'we heard after Gerry left'.  So was Kate there at all?

Note that she has to make it known she knows what was said when Gerrys left, divide and rule tactics IMO so people wonder who stirred the shite.

margaret

Posts : 585
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-09-24

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by tigger on 25.09.13 17:19

That 'Big brother' joke tells it all doesn't it.
Your niece of 4 has been abducted by a paedophile and you see the whole thing as a game show?

Thank goodness  Philomena had the holiday in Turkey to compensate.

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.

tigger

Posts : 8112
Reputation : 24
Join date : 2011-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by Lance De Boils on 25.09.13 17:38

Poe wrote:By George, I've got it!

I've sussed out the McPlan.

A McPlan so fiendish and as cunning as a fox who's just been appointed Professor of Cunning at Oxford University.




The dastardly McPlan is to, brutally and evilly, force the defence into screaming howls of helpless laughter leaving the judge no option but to have everyone (including herself) arrested for contempt of court Shocked  




Oh the inhumanity of it all!
goodpost

lol

Lance De Boils

Posts : 805
Reputation : 14
Join date : 2011-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by plebgate on 25.09.13 17:39


http://steelmagnolia-mccannarchives.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/httpflossysplace.html

Ma Healy around about 2.25 on the vid says that Mr. ans Mrs. knew immediately that someone had broken in and taken Madeleine. Also that no way would Maddie have been able to get out through the window and shutters (sumat along those lines).

So on 9th May, 2007 when this interview was held, Ma Healy still believed that the windows and shutters had been broken. No mention of the patio doors being left unlocked then?

plebgate

Posts : 5445
Reputation : 1160
Join date : 2013-02-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by PeterMac on 25.09.13 18:13

@plebgate wrote:
http://steelmagnolia-mccannarchives.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/httpflossysplace.html
Ma Healy around about 2.25 on the vid says that Mr. ans Mrs. knew immediately that someone had broken in and taken Madeleine.  Also that no way would Maddie have been able to get out through the window and shutters (sumat along those lines).
So on 9th May, 2007 when this interview was held, Ma Healy still believed that the windows and shutters had been broken.  No mention of the patio doors being left unlocked then?
And despite the broken or open shutters having been neatly disposed of on day 1.
During the same morning, whilst those two statements were being taken the PJ  started the forensic examination of the apartment, including of the shutters, and took photos.
It is clear that the shutters had not been broken, smashed, or jemmied open.

Meanwhile other people with a knowledge of the resort were giving evidence.

John Hill Mr Hill said that despite the report by a family friend that the shutters to the couple's apartment were broken, there was no sign that anyone had forced their way in while the McCanns ate at the tapas restaurant 200 yards away.  
"It's still questionable as to whether it's abduction,"  

Chief Inspector Olegario Sousa, spokesman for the investigation, later confided in British former Chief Inspector Albert Kirby that neither the windows nor their shutters had been tampered with.  
Mr Kirby told The Mail on Sunday: "
I had a very interesting chat with the officer in charge. The window shutters are not an issue.   Their mechanism makes them almost impossible to open. The door was left unlocked. They did that every night.”    

Photos exist of the forensic scientist from the PJ examining the shutters.  It is clear that the shutters are in perfect condition.    
Despite all this they were still lying to their own family.  Probably the only people on the planet who were still likely to believe them.

And now 7 years later they expect the same family members to give the same story to a Court - under oath.
Surely ONE family member has read the book, or looked at the internet, or studied the files, and has realised that the official story does not hold water.

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: MICHAEL WRIGHT EVIDENCE TRANSCRIPT

Post by plebgate on 25.09.13 18:25

Isn't it about time SY interviewed the family and asked exactly what they were told the very first time they were informed of Maddie's disappearance?

Sorry I have forgotten but didn't Mr. change his statement to the police around about the 10th May?

I wonder what was said that made Mr. angry which meant that Ma Healy would make a speedy exit?


plebgate

Posts : 5445
Reputation : 1160
Join date : 2013-02-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 10 of 13 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum