The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.


Jill Havern
Forum owner

Jeremy Wilkins

Page 11 of 12 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 10, 11, 12  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by sallypelt on 02.07.14 15:45

@missbeetle wrote:" /" />>" />

Here we have Jeremy, Gerald... and Geraint.

Is that Geraint Vincent? What is his involvement, if any, in the McCann case?

sallypelt

Posts : 3309
Reputation : 533
Join date : 2012-11-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by j.rob on 02.07.14 15:48

Who is Geraint?!

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by j.rob on 02.07.14 17:07

Very interesting thread on here about this ITN reporter and how he gave some early reports after Madeleine went missing. If you google his name along with Madelene McCann you will find a report he did for CNN where he interviews a hotelier called Sally Vincent about a 'sighting' in Bughau.

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by HelenMeg on 28.07.14 11:09

14 December 2007 | Posted by Joana Morais Leave a Comment
Previously on the Mccann's case:"Wilkins was refusing to expand on what he has told police. His girlfriend Bridget O'Donnell —who was in Praia da Luz with the producer and their eight-month-old son—said: "We have decided it's not appropriate to talk about what happened."
Wilkins' pal added: "He came back from the holiday totally shell-shocked. He was part of a British crowd which included the McCanns who became friends as they holidayed in Portugal."



I find JW's friend's comment intriguing - 'he was part of a British crowd which included the McCanns..'

This is from his friend who was just commenting naturally.  To me this is totally different than JW just bumping into other British  people by chance whilst at the resort. I firmly believe, and always have done, that JW plus TAPAS 9 plus PE etc were part of a group staying at the OC that week.

HelenMeg

Posts : 1782
Reputation : 199
Join date : 2014-01-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by Guest on 28.07.14 11:16

Yes, but the remainder of the sentence "who became friends as they holidayed in Portugal" gives the meaning that they weren't acquainted previously. 

They became aware of each other as they were all British.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by HelenMeg on 28.07.14 11:20

No Fate Worse Than De'Ath wrote:Yes, but the remainder of the sentence "who became friends as they holidayed in Portugal" gives the meaning that they weren't acquainted previously. 

They became aware of each other as they were all British.
Yes I agree - and I dont think they were friends prior to that week - but I do think they were part of a group - and that some of the group were already acquainted e.g. TAPAS 9 - and some were not.

So I believe they went out therefor the same purpose. In the same way as a group of people might go to a complex in the south of France to indulge in 'watercolour landscape painting'.
I do not believe they were all random UK citizens on holiday - there was a common denominator IMO.

HelenMeg

Posts : 1782
Reputation : 199
Join date : 2014-01-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by Newintown on 28.07.14 11:24

@HelenMeg wrote:14 December 2007 | Posted by Joana Morais   Leave a Comment  
Previously on the Mccann's case:"Wilkins was refusing to expand on what he has told police. His girlfriend Bridget O'Donnell —who was in Praia da Luz with the producer and their eight-month-old son—said: "We have decided it's not appropriate to talk about what happened."
Wilkins' pal added: "He came back from the holiday totally shell-shocked. He was part of a British crowd which included the McCanns who became friends as they holidayed in Portugal."



I find JW's friend's comment intriguing - 'he was part of a British crowd which included the McCanns..'

This is from his friend who was just commenting naturally.  To me this is totally different than JW just bumping into other British  people by chance whilst at the resort. I firmly believe, and always have done, that JW plus TAPAS 9 plus PE etc were part of a group staying at the OC that week.

I have a vague recollection from reading through the statements of the Tapas group sometime ago and I think it's been mentioned before on this forum that one of them stated that they had spoken to JW on the flight over to PDL. 

So they all must have been in the same group to be on the same flight, and what a coincidence that one of the Tapas group just happened to talk to JW on a flight full of many, many people, probably 200 or more and they ended up staying just over the road from each other.

____________________
Laurie Levenson, Quoted in the Guardian ........

"Never trust an eyewitness whose memory gets better over time"


Newintown

Posts : 1597
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2011-07-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by j.rob on 28.07.14 13:27

What makes me convinced that Jez Wilkins is much more than a completely unbiased eyewitness (are there any of those in this case? They seem be be rarer than hens' teeth) is his police statement. He completely changes his account of where he was on the evening that Madeleine disappeared which clearly shows he is not a reliable or unbiased eyewitness, imo. It is also hugely suspicious.

There are so many things in his police statement which strike me as ludicrous, as Gerry might say.

But what particularly intrigues me is where he claims that him and his partner, the journalist and writer Bridget O'Donnell,  first heard the news of Madeleine's 'abduction' at 1pm when they were woken up by Matthew Oldfield in the company of the resort manager.

If you read the statement through the lens of Madeleine McCann having been the victim of a random stranger abduction/kidnap then you naturally assume that one of the Tapas group (interestingly, though, not Gerry) wakes him up as he is a very important eye-witness. He was pushing his pram around the resort at a key time on the Thursday evening as his baby would not go to sleep (as you do). So naturally Gerry and Kate would want to know whether he saw anything suspicious.

The doorbell woke us up at about 1 am. It was the resort manager who I learnt to be John and one of Jerry's friends. I think his name was Matt. He is white, slim, and tall with greying hair. From previous conversations I learnt him to be a diabetics specialist. We met him on the way to the destination. Matt said XXXXX to the effect that Jerry's daughter had been abducted, and that Jerry said that he had met me and wanted to know if I had seen anything. I said 'You're joking'. I offered help but they said there was nothing that could be done at that stage. We remained at the apartment but could see people around the pool and at the front with torches. I also saw the police arriving. We then went to bed."


This clearly makes Jez Wilkins not only a vital eye-witness but also a potential suspect (at what point, if any, did police rule out Jez and Bridget as having any involvement with Madeleine's disappearance?)


While I always found the 'your'e joking' comment peculiar, I at first assumed it related to the 'Jerry's daughter has been abducted.' I now think it might relate to: 'Jerry said that he had met me and wanted to know if I had seen anything.'


Why did Jez, on Friday morning, tell police he saw a suspicious-looking 'rasta-man' in the Tapas that evening (later, apparently, identified as Gerry's surfing friend Mike Sperrey) but in later police statements he completely retracts this version of events? Claiming him and his partner ate in the apartment that evening but he left to push his pram around the resort for a period of time as his baby wouldn't sleep? In at least one of the later statements Jez says he saw suspicious-looking 'rasta-man' in the toilets near the Tapas restaurants. But I think there is also a statement where 'rasta-man' is not mentioned at all.


What is going on here? Which version is true, if any? Surely police would have scrutinized all this and found it highly suspicious. Mind you, one of the questions that detective Amaral asked Leics police to urgently fax to Jez shortly after he returned home was something along the lines of 'did Jez know of any reason why someone would want to kidnap Madeleine?'


I wonder how he responded to this?


In any event, what exactly made Jez change his version of events for that evening so drastically? Especially as it looks so suspicious? Who or what circumstance persuaded him to do this?


Is it possible that the Friday police statement version of events, in which, while in the Tapas restaurant, Jez spotted a suspicious-looking 'rasta-man' between 7.30pm and 8pm - is a genuine response to Matt's question as to whether Jez had seen anything? 


And I wonder why Gerry himself didn't speak to Jez once he 'discovered that Madeleine had been abducted'? You would have thought that Kate and Gerry would have spoken to shortly after 10pm as he is such an important eye-witness and also potentially could have had something to do with Madeleine's disappearance. As could any of the people in or near Ocean Club that evening


And I wonder why Matt chose to be in the company of the resort manager when he allegedly 'woke Jez up'. Why didn't Gerry or Kate go themselves? Why sent Matt instead?  


Whatever the reasons (and there are reasons for all of this....of that I am sure) I find it entirely implausible that either Jez or Bridget were asleep at 1pm when the doorbell rang, or that they 'went to bed' when Matt and the resort manager left.


But shouldn't that have been: "We went back to bed."


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JEREMY-WILKINS.htm

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by j.rob on 28.07.14 14:00

This was Amaral's question to Jeremy Wilkins:

"Namely if there is any indication of motive for anyone in the UK to kidnap the daughter of GERALD McCann."


I like the way he uses the word 'kidnap' which the McCanns never used to my knowledge, although it might well be much more apt in this case. Unlike abduction, which may have a number of different motives, the motive for kidnap, is money.

verb


  1. 1.
    abduct (someone) and hold them captive, typically to obtain a ransom.
    "militants kidnapped the daughter of a minister"



noun


  1. 1.
    the action of kidnapping someone.
    "they were arrested for robbery and kidnap"

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by j.rob on 29.07.14 14:27

Does anyone have any more information on the Irish teenager who supposedly saw Gerry McCann and Jez Wilkins speaking outside the apartment on Thursday evening? The teenager is said to have been with her family at Ocean Club that evening but they were not registered on the guest list. So does that mean they were dining at one of the restaurants but were not guests of the hotel? 

Both father and daughter returned to Luz to help with a reconstruction and to give formal statements, according to this report, so they were obviously seen to be important witnesses. I wonder who they are?

Yet another delayed report to the police as, according to this report, the teenager had gone to have a cigarette which is when she saw Gerry talking to Jez, but she did not initially report this as she did not want to confess to her parents her reason for being there.

Kate does not refer to this sighting in her book, as far as I am aware. Although she does refer to a 'holidaymaker from Ireland' sighting a man carrying a child at 10pm. Which is clearly a reference to the Smith family sighting. But she morphs this sighting into Jane Tanner's Tannerman expecting her reader to believe that the  elusive Tannerman is wandering  around the area carrying Madeleine for 45 minutes. Or perhaps he popped inside for a period of time and then popped out again. 

http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t10322-paulo-reis-writes-on-madeleine-mccann-anorak-news

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by Justformaddie on 03.08.14 22:33

So, that's jw family not wanting to speak about that night, along with the smith family not wanting to speak about that night!
IMO

____________________
Parents=protection high5 

Justformaddie

Posts : 540
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-05-13
Location : On my iPad

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by Gaggzy on 04.08.14 3:31

@Justformaddie wrote:So, that's jw family not wanting to speak about that night, along with the smith family not wanting to speak about that night!
IMO


.... along with the McCanns, the Paynes, the Oldfields, the Websters, the Tanners ....

Gaggzy

Posts : 488
Reputation : 23
Join date : 2014-06-08
Location : North West.

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by PeterMac on 04.08.14 7:39

@Gaggzy wrote:
@Justformaddie wrote:So, that's jw family not wanting to speak about that night, along with the smith family not wanting to speak about that night!
IMO
.... along with the McCanns, the Paynes, the Oldfields, the Websters, the Tanners ....

Mrs Martorell wanted to speak out - but had no information !

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 144
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by Justformaddie on 04.08.14 10:37

@Gaggzy wrote:
@Justformaddie wrote:So, that's jw family not wanting to speak about that night, along with the smith family not wanting to speak about that night!
IMO


.... along with the McCanns, the Paynes, the Oldfields, the Websters, the Tanners ....
Ha ha! I meant people that might have been honest!
Unreliable people, we'd be here all day!

____________________
Parents=protection high5 

Justformaddie

Posts : 540
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-05-13
Location : On my iPad

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by HelenMeg on 04.08.14 10:51

@PeterMac wrote:
@Gaggzy wrote:
@Justformaddie wrote:So, that's jw family not wanting to speak about that night, along with the smith family not wanting to speak about that night!
IMO
.... along with the McCanns, the Paynes, the Oldfields, the Websters, the Tanners ....

Mrs Martorell wanted to speak out - but had no information !
So reading through this - I still cant understand whether JW went to TAPAS 3rd MAY or did not.
Whatever, he appears to be singing to the hymn sheet of the gang

HelenMeg

Posts : 1782
Reputation : 199
Join date : 2014-01-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by Hicks on 04.08.14 14:14

This could be interesting. I was reading a newspaper article, date 2nd June 2007( so one month after Madeleine's disappearance) concerning an interview with Robert Murat.
The information contained within the piece has come straight from the horses mouth-so to speak.

What I found interesting is Murat's account of how he heard about Madeleine's disappearance. 

Snippet from the article......'by Murat's account, he first learned about Madeleine's disappearance around 7.30 when Samantha phoned him from Devon after watching the news on TV. Feeling the need to help, he quickly headed to the Ocean club'.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-459316/Madeleine-Is-Robert-Murat-suspect-scapegoat.html.

 Murat's account differs greatly from the account given by Steven Carpenter, he said in his statement that HE was the first to tell Murat about Madeleine after meeting him in his garden the next day.

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/STEPHEN-CARPENTER.htm. You will need to scroll down a bit.

So who is telling the truth?

Interestingly, Tuck Price (Murat's gay friend) who was popping in and out during the interview, is on record as saying to the interviewer that...'when this is all over, I hope he makes a buck or two out of it. He bloody deserves it'...... Well fancy that!!

____________________
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all the people all of the time. Abraham Lincoln.

Hicks

Posts : 976
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2013-07-16
Age : 58

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by j.rob on 25.09.14 18:58

@HelenMeg wrote:
@PeterMac wrote:
@Gaggzy wrote:
@Justformaddie wrote:So, that's jw family not wanting to speak about that night, along with the smith family not wanting to speak about that night!
IMO
.... along with the McCanns, the Paynes, the Oldfields, the Websters, the Tanners ....

Mrs Martorell wanted to speak out - but had no information !
So reading through this - I still cant understand whether JW went to TAPAS 3rd MAY or did not.
Whatever, he appears to be singing to the hymn sheet of the gang
When he first went to police on Friday 4th May he told police that he saw suspicious-looking 'rasta-man' in the tapas bar between 7.30pm and 8pm. I had always assumed that would mean Jez meant he was dining there, but I suppose it could imply he spotted him from outside.

But, in later statements, after returning to the UK (and presumably when a few ducks had been lined up by TM) Jez says he stayed in the apartment that evening but pushed his pram around the resort for a period of time during which he bumped into Gerry McCann outside the McCann apartment. And in at least one of the later police statements he mentions seeing suspicious-looking 'rasta-man' but says he saw him in the toilets near the tapas restaurant. I think he is also pushed on whether he could see inside the tapas restaurant (presumably due to his earlier statement) from his position outside, and I am pretty sure he says he couldn't.  Which, if it were impossible to see inside the restaurant from outside, would then show up his Friday statement to police as being less than truthful. 

Given the time frame, Jez cannot have forgotten where he saw suspicious 'rasta- man'. The inside of a restaurant cannot be confused with the inside of a toilet block, imo.

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by j.rob on 25.09.14 19:03

@MaybeMaybenot wrote:
@Latetothecase wrote:One of the most interesting things Jez Wilkins' police interview about his time line to me is that whilst "cleaning a bag" he found Murat's card inside. With no recollection of him giving him his card.

How on earth would Murat have access to your luggage in your holiday apartment JW? Did he know your wife, let's face it the ladies normally oversee packing of holidays with children abroad. Did he go in your apartment?

Did someone else put it there?

Was it your bag?

What would you say now Jeremiah if you had the chance over again?
It's not too late to free yourself of the albatross attached to you and yours name for ever more, otherwise.
The time is nigh, for many to speak out imo.
Ding ding

???? I am intrigued.....

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by j.rob on 07.10.14 0:17

@MaybeMaybenot wrote:4th of May Jeremy was describing his Rastaman spotting
7th of May as follows....


1. Could you consider making enquiries to question JEREMY MICHAEL WILKINS (UK Passport No. XXXXXX, DOB XXXXXX). Wilkins was staying at the Ocean Club resort at the time of Madeleine's disappearance and may have vital information. Wilkins lives at the following address, XXXXXX. Wilkins is contactable on the following telephone numbers XXXXXX and XXXXXX. We would like the following points covered if possible;

- Did Wilkins travel with anyone else?

- If he has children and what age are they?

- If he knows the group of people which MADELEINE MCCANN was part of and the apartment block where the guests were staying;

- If he knows MADELEINE'S parents and in particular her father GERALD MCCANN;

- When did he met GERALD MCCANN and in what circumstances;

- Did he play tennis with GERALD McCANN? Did he meet with him apart from playing tennis?

- Did he come to know the routine of GERALD McCANN and his family (his wife and children); If he did, when GERALD was having dinner with his wife and friends where were the children and how were they looked after?

- When was the last time he was with GERALD McCANN, when not playing tennis, before the disappearance of MADELEINE;

- On the day of the disappearance, was JEREMY out with his children in the evening? Did he meet GERALD and at what time? Where was GERALD coming from at this time?

- Exactly where was this meeting with GERALD (please obtain confirmation of the exact location on the attached map)? What was the distance of this meeting from GERALD'S apartment? Can Jeremy provide a sketch map of the location? What did they talk about at this time and for how long?

- When he was talking with GERALD, did any of Gerald's group pass by? If so, who?

- When he was talking with GERALD did he see whether anyone passed by carrying a child in the road near the apartment block?

2. In the spirit of police to police cooperation we request the presence of a British criminal analyst who may be able to assist the enquiry;

Also the collaboration of the UK's "Child Exploitation on Line Protection" may be useful if they wish to send one of their officers to provide assistance to the investigation;

3. We would like further information (by telephonic analysis if thought necessary) relevant to the investigation about the following subjects:

- GERALD McCANN and KATE HEALY contactable on telephone numbers XXXXXX, XXXXXX and XXXXXX.
- MATTHEW DAVID OLDFIELD and RACHAEL MAMPILLY, contactable on telephone numbers XXXXXX, XXXXXX and XXXXXX.
- RUSSEL JAMES O'BRIEN and JANE MICHELLE TANNER, contactable on telephone numbers XXXXXX and XXXXXX.
- DAVID ANTHONY PAYNE, contactable on telephone number XXXXXX, FIONA ELAINE PAYNE, contactable on telephone number XXXXXX and DIANNE WEBSTER, contactable on telephone number XXXXXX.

Namely if there is any indication of motive for anyone in the UK to kidnap the daughter of GERALD McCann.

Regards

P/O Coordinator of Criminal Investigation

(Goncalo Amaral)



Jane Tanner did indeed fcuk up the plan  big grin .....IMO


Well yes, the plan was messed up....but I suspect that JT was the rather unfortunate 'messanger' - (always good to get someone else to be the scapegoat... whatever..if you are of the TM persuasion that is, imo!.)

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by j.rob on 07.10.14 15:19

Just what was Jez' role in all this? I do not believe it was a coincidence that he jumped into Gerry that evening. Or, that either one or other of them or both of them concocted a story about bumping into each other at a crucial time that Thursday evening. And if one of them concocted the 9pm (ish) bumping into each other, the other was obliged to go along with it.

I also don't think it was a coincidence that Jez and his partner Bridget were there that week. The very week that a massive news story broke, and right under the very noses of a producer of TV drama and a journalist who formerly worked on Crimewatch.

It is beyond extraordinary that Jez Wilkins apparently 'bumped' into Gerry at such a crucial time and in such a crucial place very shortly before Madeleine's alleged abduction.

Given the very early and very high level of media coverage of Madeleine's alleged 'abduction' just where does Jez Wilkins fit in to it all? What are his links with Sky, I wonder? And that very peculiar article that his partner Bridget O'Donnell wrote in the Guardian I think it was in late 2007 which bore the headline: "My months with Madeleine."

What 'months with Madeleine? They just happened to be staying in the same resort for a week, right? So why would Bridget O'Donnell have had 'months with Madeleine?'

I presume that the timing of this article was highly strategic.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2007/dec/14/ukcrime.madeleinemccann

Other links:

http://steelmagnolia-steelmagnolia.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/donal-macintyre-did-he-help-out-his-old.html

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/2010/07/jez-wilkins-and-bridget-odonnell-hoax.html

http://missingmadeleine.forumotion.net/t14209p45-jes-wilkins

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by j.rob on 07.10.14 15:56

Hadn't seen this before:

Why are the "Tapas 9" key to solving the Madeleine mystery?

http://www.health-forums.com/alt-support-schizophrenia/madeleine-team-mccann-177112.html

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Gosh you scrub up well, Jeremy...!

Post by missbeetle on 07.12.14 8:26

Paparazzi- type picture of Mr Jez (and an Audi?) looking seedy dated September 16th, 2007 :


(snipped from Brunopress.com)


Two days later, a shave and a buttoned-up cardy have worked wonders for Jeremy:



...as well as a bedaughtered bicycle photo opportunity :



My opinion only.

____________________
'Tis strange, but true; for truth is always strange...
(from Lord Byron's 'Don Juan', 1823)

missbeetle

Posts : 985
Reputation : 19
Join date : 2014-02-28
Location : New Zealand

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by j.rob on 07.12.14 17:35

@j.rob wrote:
@MaybeMaybenot wrote:
@Latetothecase wrote:One of the most interesting things Jez Wilkins' police interview about his time line to me is that whilst "cleaning a bag" he found Murat's card inside. With no recollection of him giving him his card.

How on earth would Murat have access to your luggage in your holiday apartment JW? Did he know your wife, let's face it the ladies normally oversee packing of holidays with children abroad. Did he go in your apartment?

Did someone else put it there?

Was it your bag?

What would you say now Jeremiah if you had the chance over again?
It's not too late to free yourself of the albatross attached to you and yours name for ever more, otherwise.
The time is nigh, for many to speak out imo.
Ding ding

???? I am intrigued.....

There is much of potential interest in that post. Why would Jez tell police he was 'cleaning a bag' when he found Murat's card inside? 

'Cleaning a bag' is a highly emotive phrase in the context of a missing child and, as it happens, a missing sports bag from the McCann apartment which the police appear to have taken an interest in.

He could have just said he opened a bag and found the card there, but he specifically states he was 'cleaning' a bag when he found Murat's card inside.

This has to be Jez' way of issuing some kind of warning sign to the Tapas and Murat, imo. Each party has dirt to dish on the other I suspect.

And to say cleaning 'a' bag rather than 'my' bag does also beg the question asked by the poster in the quote above. Whose bag was it? Why does Jez say that Murat's card is in it. And why does Jez say he was cleaning it?

This certainly would suggest that a bag, cleaning (possibly of a bag and almost definitely of an apartment and other things) and Murat are all important to this case. (Not that we didn't already know all that of course.)

And Jez will spill the beans if certain conditions are not met, imo. Such as Tapas keeping schtum about any role he may have played, either wittingly or unwittingly, in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann

j.rob

Posts : 2243
Reputation : 228
Join date : 2014-02-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Jes Wilkens

Post by GrizzleyBear on 07.12.14 17:43

I have never felt confident in the veracity of JW's statements and have asked this question before: What was in the pram he was pushing?

GrizzleyBear

Posts : 13
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Jeremy Wilkins

Post by Guest on 07.12.14 17:50

"I then walked back to the apartment. I had dinner, watched a DVD and
went to bed at about 11 pm."


Strange that JW and partner didn't hear any of the commotion taking place nearby.

Did Jeremiah disclose what DVD he watched?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Page 11 of 12 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 10, 11, 12  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum