The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

Very perceptive article

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Very perceptive article

Post by PeterMac on 21.04.13 7:45

With acknowledgements to
http://l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com/Madeleine_-_6_Years_Gone.html

Madeleine - 6 Years Gone
Kate McCann fears for her Twins

Then why did “terrified” Kate McCann only this past week if this is the case, choose such a time to begin leaving the twins alone in the car at the petrol station while she paid for fuel?
How far will the McCanns go for their Farce aand their Fund?
The answer to that is in their latest sick stunt!

I have always felt great sadness and concern for the McCann twins in equal measure. Never getting to know their sister Madeleine, much too young at the time of her disappearance for them to now remember her, but to have their heads filled with stories of a scary man who took her, the burglar as their parents tell them, who took something which didn’t belong to him, but belonged to them – their sister Madeleine, and of how he might strike if they are in the car alone. A lot for young children to take on board, understand.
They celebrate the birthday of this sister who they never got to know, gifts are bought for her, given in the name of the twins. Christmas too this is the practice.
Their parents speak to the press about them. Make public what the children say and do or rather the parents present us with stories. Whether the twins did in actual fact ever say, or do, any, or even some of the things which Kate and Gerry McCann have made public I would leave a huge question mark!

They are known to embellish at these times, and very much more at others.
They want the world to believe that Madeleine plays a big part in the young twin’s lives, when realistically that cannot happen, nor can it be true. Of course there will be reminders of Madeleine in their home, and they will be told stories of her by their parents. Not a parent in the world who would wish that family members ever forget a lost loved one. But the twins cannot possibly remember her. They can be reminded of a time when she was there with them, but they themselves will not remember Madeleine. This was evident in ‘Madeleine Was Here’ when Kate had to prompt the little ones to say their sister’s name.
The twins cannot miss or grieve for Madeleine as her parents do, as simply they don’t remember their sister. And it is wrong to expect that they do. No amount of prompting will allow these children to experience the same feeling of loss as older or adult members of this family who do remember a time when Madeleine was with them.

Kate and Gerry McCann harmed all three of their children when they so horribly, cruelly abandoned them night after night whilst on holiday in Portugal. Madeleine their eldest daughter vanished, never to be found.
Perhaps the McCanns should be grateful their young twins were too young to remember what must have been a terrible time for them, waking in the nights, no mummy and daddy there to comfort them.
They have blamed in one way or another, everyone they could think of for this, never once, accepting any blame whatsoever, directly or indirectly for Madeleine having vanished off the face of the earth.

Every Anniversary of this child’s disappearance they pull a stunt, together with Clarence Mitchell. Sightings of Madeleine appear in the press, stories arranged by McCann team. Televised interviews arranged where presenters of morning shows, sit posing the pre-agreed questions to be put to the couple, their answers rehearsed. The presenters fawn over them. If these presenters had taken the time to read the police files to view/read each and every interview this couple have given, the dishonesty, and inconsistencies in their story would jump out at them. But pertinent questions are not allowed.
But they don’t bother, don't seem to mind they would rather ignore what happened to Madeleine, favouring pandering to the parents who caused her not to be here.
Every anniversary of Madeleine’s disappearance brings more bizarre stories, more interviews, more ridiculous press stories, all created by the McCann team.
But none more concerning than when they “use” their twin children to serve a purpose on their agenda, we have witnessed this time and time again.
After Madeleine’s disappearance, one would think, hope that these people would take better care of the remaining children, and that does not simply involving keeping an eye on them when paying for petrol!

Amelie and Sean McCann should absolutely not be exposed to the media in any way manner or form. Yet their parents continually allow this to happen.
Gerry McCann hi-jacked, Hacked Off, complaining about every aspect of the media, stating that the media frightened his children.
It is NOT the media who chase the McCanns to obtain a story, to hear a tale of the twin children it is Clarence Mitchell, together with Kate and Gerry McCann who are responsible. It is they who create whatever tale they feel will get them the most attention, the attention they crave so badly.

Kate McCann wasn’t forced to take part in the recent round of interviews, not forced to pose for pictures for press release. She stands looking woeful as that is what she wanted to do.
First off there is always news of whatever money making scheme they have concocted and we are told the “search” will have to be discontinued if we don’t give more, that they are running short of cash, their Fund requires ‘topping- up.’ But in truth, does anyone at all know what this so called “search” involves? Does anyone at all know, what is this entity they have labelled ‘The Search?’ because as sure as eggs are eggs, I have not a clue!

Kate then gets into character – playing the victim –‘they hate me because I’m fat/skinny/dumb/blonde/horrible voice/no boobs/short hair/long hair.cold/boring/gorgeous/heartless. Her list is endless. Endlessly self- serving!
Madeleine barely gets a mention, increasingly it is all about her mum.
‘Kate McCann - by Kate McCann! ‘

As time passes it is more difficult for them to keep the public attention, to keep the public parting with their cash for THAT Fund
Their tales of woe have to be made more dramatic, Kate has to appear more wounded each year, and there has to be someone who is to blame for this. This year internet trolls – whatever they are when at home!
Also if they want continued support for the Fund, Madeleine too has to be alive! At all costs, that is the message they have to get across.

But as we all know, chances of that are less than slim.
Colin Sutton, a former chief inspector of London’s Metropolitan Police, speaking about missing person cases in general, and more specifically the Metropolitan review of the Madeleine case too:
“Technically you have to use these media opportunities to get help, you can’t stress in an appeal (for information) that she may be dead or you are switching people off”
He continued: “If a person is missing for more than 48 hours, there is a 90 per cent chance that they won’t be coming back. A lot of the team will be thinking that she simply isn’t alive.
It’s a fact, that the McCanns also would have had to face, and that while police officers would have been sensitive, they certainly wouldn’t have shied from it as a distinct possibility
They would have been told she is dead, and they would have accepted that, but they, as her parents, also have to believe that she will be found one day.”

This statement by Colin Sutton goes a long way to help understand the statement by Andy Redwood when he declared he had taken TWO positions in this case – One that Madeleine is alive, the other is that she is not!

Was he saying Madeleine may be alive, knowing that the likelihood is that she is not, but as Sutton said, just following protocol?
If she is dead, then how that came to be is the question that needs answered, and it isn’t looking very likely that she was abducted, in fact the investigation suggests otherwise.
It would explain also, the review team consisting of homicide detectives!

The McCann ‘Annual Publicity Stunt’ – 2011 we had Kate announce to the world that she now believed Madeleine had been trying to tell her that it was an intruder who had woken her the night before she vanished. How very convenient!

Did not though Kate and Gerry McCann tell us that Madeleine was not upset at the time when she told them of her and her brother’s upset of the previous evening, when they had woken up and were crying for mummy and daddy – that, that she had told them of their upset, and then - just ‘dropped it?’
The thing with Kate and Gerry McCann is that they seem unable to keep to one version of any particular story. The other thing is that they will use anyone, even their children, to achieve whatever is their goal.
Just when you think though that this couple could not sink any lower in this regard, using their children in a way they should be ashamed, up they pop again, this year, kicking off with the fantastic tale, that Kate forgives the abductor who took Madeleine. The child who the world was asked to believe is alive and with a paedophile, a paedophile who did things to her daughter which Kate imagined and described so graphically in her book, and she forgives him.

Is she able to forgive as she knows he does not exist?
The public were outraged at these comments. It very much came across that if her daughter was alive that she had no empathy for what the little one would have suffered at the hands of an evil brute, but had sympathy and forgiveness in abundance for the perpetrator of the crimes against her. She could she said forgive him in any circumstance.

Story number two on the 6th Anniversary agenda – was the rather outrageous tale at the pumps, the petrol station! This time, we heard of how Kate, when ‘filling-up’ always thereafter takes the twins with her when she pays for the fuel, keeps them by her side but suddenly in the last few days, she decided it was time for her ‘to leave them in the car. So this she did!

Interesting that, as number three in her little trilogy, had Kate doing what she does best - telling porkies! She spoke of a death threat it seems, in one of their “anniversary” interviews. Seems too she suggested that she feared for the twins. She was terrified.
Now let us call a spade a spade. There is no death threat hanging over Kate McCann. She knows this, the police know this, and the public know this too.
Even if there had been a credible threat, do we honestly think for a second the police would have advised her make this public, make it part of her annual stunt?
Do we really think she would be running in the Marathon if this was the case?

But very much more importantly, if this mum truly knew of any real threat to her and to her twin children, where they could be harmed at any time, at any place, or at a specific event like the London Marathon, why would she sit laughing and joking chatting to the giggly Lorraine Kelly? Why would she run in the Marathon? And why would she have spoken of this when she would know absolutely that it would hit the headlines, that her twin children would see this, or hear of it from school friends. That it would frighten the living daylights out of them.
Hardly the actions of a responsible adult, mother! Chilling in fact.

If she thought forgiving the abductor was not, cause enough for the public to be outraged, mother’s across the globe will be appalled that she would do this, that she would have "given" the press such a story, such a headline. Every mother of a young child, every mother of a now grown child will be thinking back to when their child/ren were 8 years old, and how they would feel to see such a headline, how their child would feel to read or hear this.
The absolute horror and fear this would instil in their child/ren, and yes, the little ones would believe it to be true, as it was their mummy who said it.

Kate McCanns actions, and behaviour are not those of a loving, caring mum, a mum who feared for her children’s safety. If she genuinely felt her children were at risk, that she was going to be a target, pot shots taken at her at the Marathon, she would not be taking part and she most certainly would not have brought this to public, drawing surely what was unwanted attention to her children.

If the police knew of any threat imminent or otherwise to these children they would not have considered it safe for Kate McCann to sit and speak of this in a tv broadcast. They would be questioning her, asking her why she had deliberately put her children at risk. If the Missing People Charity thought Kate McCann and her children were at risk they would not allow her to run on their behalf, her sponsors would understand completely.
But there is no risk to the lives of the McCann twins they were used for what has now become an annual publicity stunt.

For the “6th” Kate pulled out all the stops with her trilogy! Horrifyingly she used the twins to do so.
What type of people would do this? These children, they don’t remember Madeleine, but every day of their lives, they are made to remember her. Their adult life will be no different, worse perhaps as by then they will understand that all is not what they had been fed throughout their childhood.
Kate's book, Madeleine she said was written so that they the children would have an account of what happened to Madeleine, but there is a fly in this docs ointment - she has
given other accounts elsewhere, all available on internet.

What will Sean and Amelie think?
They may read some nasty things written about their parents, but they will read also the truth of matters, and that has to be Kate and Gerry McCanns greatest fear. The various accounts of events as told by their parents, refusals, not searching for Madeleine, not co-operating fully with police, and much more. They will discover the part their parents played, before, during and after Madeleine’s disappearance.

Gerry McCann (2010): “Sean talks all of the time about finding Maddie, and what he will do to the person who stole her. They know they went to sleep and when they woke up she had disappeared. But they still don’t understand that somebody took her.
When they become aware of this I think they will want to know where we were. And we will have to explain to them that we were having dinner in the restaurant next door.”

(Is ‘next door’ the same as dining in your back garden I wonder?)

It’s now 2013 I think Amelie and Sean may just be asking those questions now, and, I think they will be wanting to know why it is their mother on national television spoke of them being harmed, fearing for them? Why their names in this regard appeared in newspaper headlines.
The McCanns should be protecting these children, not exposing them, not using them in the way that they do. How can they complain about the press, intrusion in their lives, intimidation of their children, when they themselves contribute by creating stories, headlines in a bid for publicity for their Fund!

Jeremy Paxman nailed it on this count, enraging Gerry McCann in the process.
Paxman: “But then you had this entire media circus camped out around you, but YOU collaborated with them when it was CONVENIENT to you, didn’t you, and you would announce photo-calls, and whether or not you would be speaking that day, or maybe tomorrow or the day after”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIvFkXkVn1I

This year the annual dose of nonsense was more sickening, more concerning than ever before. I guess not being able to say that there is no one, no law enforcement agency doing anything, had them struggling to come up with something. There was no book launch, no documentary, they had to get their thinking caps on. But to sink to the levels which Kate McCann has this past week, involving her twin children as she has, fills me with disgust, despair as to what lies ahead for the twins when their mother conducts herself as she has and the father clearly condoning, going along with this.
It is utterly shocking, sickening, stomach churning, beyond belief.
Is there no one in the McCann extended family who can take them aside tell them that what they are doing, doing to their twin children is distasteful, not responsible, so extremely harmful to these children.
Kate McCann says she worries about the stuff that the twins might come across on the internet, what they might see.
Something they will never see is a threat against them.
The reason that story is out there now is because their mummy saw to that, which is not only tragically sad, but it leads me to believe that someone, be it social services or some other child protection agency should be taking a close look at this matter, the situation regarding this threat Kate McCann has raised and her concern, for her children.
If there is any threat of harm, physical, or to their welfare and wellbeing, from whatever quarter, be that out-with the family home or otherwise, if there is an unhealthy atmosphere, an atmosphere where these twins feel vulnerable, afraid, this quite frankly has to be addressed. It is matter of extreme urgency importance that someone from a proper child protection authority does so.

When there are headlines which highlight a threat a potential risk to these children and that headline was borne of what the mother said on television, a headline which would frighten these children witless then something has to be done about it. It has to be investigated as to why their mother would do this.
There can be no one out there now, no mother who could respect the actions of Kate McCann.
As for her appearing on Daybreak, and her smile being described as the first in 6 years – where have these people been these past six years – On Madeleine’s 4th birthday just days after she disappeared, Kate and Gerry McCann when leaving the church in PDL beamed a smile wider than any mother or father whose child, it was claimed was abducted by paedophiles should have been able to.

The only gunfire we have heard the past few days is Kate McCann repeatedly shooting herself in the foot, her desperate bid for attention massively backfiring. And tomorrow the only shots we will hear is - the sound of the starting pistol!

My heart goes out to the McCann twins, Amelie and Sean. They don't deserve this latest by their parents, they, like Madeleine, the innocent victims.

l-azzerlie-lies-in-the-sun.com
April 2013

This is a site I had not come across before.
Most revealing analysis of each of the Tapas statements about the regular or non existentr checking regime.

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by Smokeandmirrors on 21.04.13 9:06

Nice find Peter!

____________________
The truth will out.

Smokeandmirrors
Moderator

Posts : 2428
Reputation : 5
Join date : 2011-07-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by Guest on 21.04.13 9:12

I've bookmarked it, to read the other articles later on.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by PeterMac on 21.04.13 10:05

Me too. There is mountain of analysis there.
Pity about the type face, and size, but I have copied and pasted into a word processing document for ease

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by Guest on 21.04.13 10:29

The writer has a clear and deep perception of what is going on. an exceptionally good artical

Thanks for the find PeterMac.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by aiyoyo on 21.04.13 12:21

WOW, Just WOW! There are quite some articles there about the Mccanns; all very perceptive.
The author certainly has a good knowledge of the case.

And, the mccanns think this forum is the only one that is skeptical of their pulp fiction.
Oh dear! Kevin, are you listening?
We are not the only ones. They are plenty people out there who knows your clients are full of porkies.

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by aiyoyo on 21.04.13 12:28

I particularly like this one:


No Hope for Madeleine? 2


So WHY did the McCanns and their acquaintances and friends NOT want to help police discover by way of a reconstruction what may have become of the child, her whereabouts?

We know they made demands of the Portuguese police, one being that they wanted the arguido status (persons of interest to the investigation) which hung over the McCann couple to be lifted before they would consider helping Madeleine, the police by taking part in a reconstruction.

If this findable little girl was to have any hope of being found, that hope did not lie with her parents or their pals as they had no intention of heading to Portugal.

By Crime correspondent Martin Brunt
Will they, won't they go to back to Praia da Luz for the reconstruction?
A call from Portugal tells me the McCanns' lawyer has said the couple are now prepared to take part in a re-enactment of the night Madeleine disappeared.

But the McCanns' spokesman, Clarence, says they are still considering the "request" from the Portuguese police and their legal man in Lisbon has been misquoted.
They still want their arguido status lifted, but would go back if ordered to.
Anything to help the investigation, he says.
But if they have a choice, they don't see the point in a reconstruction that would not be televised as an appeal for information.
He says the detectives turned down that idea months ago.

And, says a friend, no one has bothered to consider the emotional impact on Kate who would find it difficult to watch a young girl playing her missing daughter.
It's unlikely to happen unless everyone agrees to return, including the Tapas 7, some of whom have reservations after twice being quizzed over the events of that night.
Apparently, a third date for the reconstruction has been scheduled, but what's the point if the protagonists are not there?
It was to have been before the year's anniversary, then this week, now the May 30.

Written by Martin, May 15, 2008


So we had a ‘will they, won’t they situation in the case of missing Madeleine. Would her parents and their band of buddies do the right thing and help the child?

Seems not!

Clarence Mitchell the McCann spokesperson said they were “considering” the request.

What was there to consider – their daughter was missing, according to them with a paedophile – and they were “considering” a request to help the child?


But of course why would they help their own daughter, they had more pressing issues to consider– the removal of their arguido status! The status, which allowed Kate McCann to refuse to answer questions regarding the disappearance of her daughter.

Seems this status she liked when it suited her needs.

Of course it was her right legally to refuse to answer when questioned by police - but WHY would the mother of the missing child REFUSE to help police, and knowingly HINDER the investigation?

But hey, all hope for Madeleine was not lost, her mummy and daddy would help the investigation to find her IF they were ORDERED TO!


Not out of a sense of urgency to rescue the little one, have her back home, out of the hands of the paedophiles they believed held her captive, who tortured her, not out of the love of their child, would they help, they would help if ORDERED TO!

“Anything to help the investigation” stated their £70,000 per year spokesperson!

The truth of matters though, he continued to tell us –

McCANNS DIDN’T SEE THE POINT IN A RECONSTRUCTION!


A reconstruction which would most certainly have helped police, and most likely CONFIRMED what most PROBABLY happened to their missing daughter and they REFUSED!

A reconstruction does not have to be 'televised' be an 'appeal' for it to be fruitful, helpful to an investigation, and they KNEW THIS!

And, as ever in this case, a McCann friend, nameless of course, had something to say – ‘it would be difficult for
Kate to watch a child playing her daughter!’


Funny that as the McCanns got a child to play Madeleine in their own wee documentary, a child who is reported to have been extremely upset at playing the part. Not that the young child would know the "part" she was playing, just simply, she did not enjoy being carted around on a cold night in her pyjamas!


However difficult Kate McCann might have felt it to watch, it would not come close to how difficult things were for her daughter with her captor.

I do not know of any mother who would put her own feelings before that of her missing child.

Martin Brunt asks ‘what is the point if the protagonists are not there?’

One can only ask again WHY, would these people, the child’s parents also, not go there? Why would they NOT HELP HER?

WHY when they speak of HOPE of finding her alive and well, and unharmed would they REFUSE HER that HOPE?






l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com

April 2013

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by Guest on 21.04.13 12:39

Scathing!

How come we've not seen this blog before? Must admit it's new to me; and very perceptive.


Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by Guest on 21.04.13 12:54

S/he is very well versed as one can tell from her paraphrasing from the files, interviews and news articles. And very, very funny. I just read "Maddie's Mum and the Marathon" and had some big laughs [inasmuch as one can laugh about the matter].

http://l-azzeri-lies-in-the-sun.com/Maddie_s_Mum___Marathon.html

Snippet
"This year's panto piece - Panic at the Petrol Pumps! "

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by PeterMac on 21.04.13 13:04

@Portia wrote:Scathing!
How come we've not seen this blog before? Must admit it's new to me; and very perceptive.
Seems quite recent. Hosted in the USA.
A lot to get through, and though much is what we have already found out, putting the pieces together in a different way, as he /she does with the Tapas statements about the checks, makes it much more clear.

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by russiandoll on 21.04.13 13:25

Just read " JUST CHECKING " on this blog and see the same conclusion re the Oldfiels check reached there as well as by others including myself on this forum, about how everyone but the Paynes were acquaintances not friends of the McCanns and why Oldfield going into 5a to probably end up scaring the heck out of a possibly awake Maddie is a nonsense.
Thanks Peter, was unaware of this blog but will now read with interest.

Could not agree more with the incongruity noticed in Kate suddenly and recently having the courage to leave the twins alone in the car for a few minutes, the very week she fears for their safety.
Shame on the parents too if they have been telling the twins the reason they have always been taken from the car at the petrol station is so they can't be taken by a stranger.

Know what, McCanns and co? I am sick of hearing and reading that it appears to be now almost breaking a law not to give any credit to your abduction story. You can't NOT provide any evidence and then expect your story to be accepted.
Sometimes professional investigators must decide on credibility in the absence of evidence. So, re: credibility...
1.You have among your group doctors. I do not accept that any of you left a child who could walk in an apartment in the dark, where waking could lead to an accident. Nor do I believe that you left any child who could walk with access to a door which could be opened, with access to dangers outside.
I do not believe that any of you locked a child who could walk in an apartment where that child could walk over to a door and be terrified by not being able to open it and leave.
If you left unlocked doors, and sleeping children who could walk if they woke, in an apartment, I believe you felt very sure that an accident due to a child waking and falling indoors would not happen, nor would an accident happen due to a child who could walk exiting that door.
I do not accept that a baby monitor would prevent such an accident, by the time you had reached your apartment it would be too late.
A baby monitor is uselful to alert you to a problem with a baby, useless where a child able to walk is concerned.

Therefore, bearing in mind that a child could wake and walk immediately after your check,[ and quite possibly this IS when your child might wake, with the opening and closing of a door ] so 30 minutes before you would find your possibly injured child, I find it credible that if you left your able to walk children in an apartment , it was only under the circumstances where you were satisfied that the child would remain asleep for the duration of your meal.
I find it NOT credible that some person/s DID NOT sedate at least those children who could walk.

____________________



             The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate,
contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and
unrealistic.
~John F. Kennedy


russiandoll

Posts : 3942
Reputation : 7
Join date : 2011-09-11

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by Guest on 21.04.13 13:36

Hello Russian Doll,


Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by celtclogs on 21.04.13 16:44

Very good blog Peter, thanks And lots to read, thats what I like but I don't think the McCanns will like it

celtclogs

Posts : 78
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-02-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by Nina on 21.04.13 16:47

Russian Doll, am listening to choir music which gives me the goose bumps, and your post has actually reduced me to tears, so very very spot on. It is a group of doctors in a with a group of children going out on the lash and leaving the group of small children able, even capable of injuring themselves. And not accepting that they have done anything wrong at all. I am amazed that all these doctors are still working in a so called caring profession. I wouldn't trust them to take care of my dogs, as my sense of danger for my dogs in their so called care would be heightened, knowing what I know of them.

____________________
Not one more cent from me.

Nina

Posts : 2626
Reputation : 215
Join date : 2011-06-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by Monty Heck on 21.04.13 23:25

Nina Today at 4:47 pm
It's absolutely NOT credible that a group of medics left children capable of waking and getting up to mischief or putting themselves in danger during periods of parental absence, without taking precautions to ensure that WOULDN'T happen. How on earth otherwise were they collectively capable of such a "relaxed" attitude towards parenting? There are comments dotted around in their statements which reveal that their children "had their moments" during the daytime. Talk of "loose nappies" and infants making a fuss about being left at creche come to mind, yet come the evening, bathtime, story, bed and peace, perfect peace that miraculously lasted all night long........amazing. Amazing too, that there was no enquiry by the NHS employers of the group, no testing of any of these children,

Monty Heck

Posts : 470
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2012-09-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by Nina on 21.04.13 23:51

@Monty Heck wrote: Nina Today at 4:47 pm
It's absolutely NOT credible that a group of medics left children capable of waking and getting up to mischief or putting themselves in danger during periods of parental absence, without taking precautions to ensure that WOULDN'T happen. How on earth otherwise were they collectively capable of such a "relaxed" attitude towards parenting? There are comments dotted around in their statements which reveal that their children "had their moments" during the daytime. Talk of "loose nappies" and infants making a fuss about being left at creche come to mind, yet come the evening, bathtime, story, bed and peace, perfect peace that miraculously lasted all night long........amazing. Amazing too, that there was no enquiry by the NHS employers of the group, no testing of any of these children,

Yes indeed Monty Heck, no investigations, or at least none we the public have heard about. And I read on here the other day one of them has now opened a clinic on Harley Street.

____________________
Not one more cent from me.

Nina

Posts : 2626
Reputation : 215
Join date : 2011-06-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by ShuBob on 22.04.13 1:00

@Nina wrote:
@Monty Heck wrote: Nina Today at 4:47 pm
It's absolutely NOT credible that a group of medics left children capable of waking and getting up to mischief or putting themselves in danger during periods of parental absence, without taking precautions to ensure that WOULDN'T happen. How on earth otherwise were they collectively capable of such a "relaxed" attitude towards parenting? There are comments dotted around in their statements which reveal that their children "had their moments" during the daytime. Talk of "loose nappies" and infants making a fuss about being left at creche come to mind, yet come the evening, bathtime, story, bed and peace, perfect peace that miraculously lasted all night long........amazing. Amazing too, that there was no enquiry by the NHS employers of the group, no testing of any of these children,

Yes indeed Monty Heck, no investigations, or at least none we the public have heard about. And I read on here the other day one of them has now opened a clinic on Harley Street.

A case of mistaken identity. The Harley Street doctor happens to have the same name as one of the tapas members.

ShuBob

Posts : 1893
Reputation : 57
Join date : 2012-02-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Very perceptive article

Post by Nina on 22.04.13 9:41

@ShuBob wrote:
@Nina wrote:
@Monty Heck wrote: Nina Today at 4:47 pm
It's absolutely NOT credible that a group of medics left children capable of waking and getting up to mischief or putting themselves in danger during periods of parental absence, without taking precautions to ensure that WOULDN'T happen. How on earth otherwise were they collectively capable of such a "relaxed" attitude towards parenting? There are comments dotted around in their statements which reveal that their children "had their moments" during the daytime. Talk of "loose nappies" and infants making a fuss about being left at creche come to mind, yet come the evening, bathtime, story, bed and peace, perfect peace that miraculously lasted all night long........amazing. Amazing too, that there was no enquiry by the NHS employers of the group, no testing of any of these children,

Yes indeed Monty Heck, no investigations, or at least none we the public have heard about. And I read on here the other day one of them has now opened a clinic on Harley Street.



A case of mistaken identity. The Harley Street doctor happens to have the same name as one of the tapas members.

Thank you ShuBob. Poor woman.

____________________
Not one more cent from me.

Nina

Posts : 2626
Reputation : 215
Join date : 2011-06-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum