The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hello!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When posting please be mindful that this forum is primarily about the death of a three year old girl.

Regards,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

Justice Hogg

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Justice Hogg

Post by Guest on Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:13 pm

I was just thinking, as Madeleine is still ward of court, couln not Justice Hogg play a role in the upcoming proceedings in Portugal and even possibly in the UK?
This all based on the assumption that the ward of court rule is still active.

Wasn't the claim against Amaral as well in the name of Madeleine McCann, and would not Justice Hogg have to have agreed with that?
Legally, me thinks, the McCanns cannot speak or act for Madeleine anymore, am I correct on that?

And in the same vain, could not Justice Hogg order 'the Fund", the McCanns, to file a claim against Halligan for all that money, that was donated ' to find Madeleine'.

Just thinking...

parapono


Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Justice Hogg

Post by T4two on Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:27 am

parapono wrote:I was just thinking, as Madeleine is still ward of court, couln not Justice Hogg play a role in the upcoming proceedings in Portugal and even possibly in the UK?
This all based on the assumption that the ward of court rule is still active.

Wasn't the claim against Amaral as well in the name of Madeleine McCann, and would not Justice Hogg have to have agreed with that?
Legally, me thinks, the McCanns cannot speak or act for Madeleine anymore, am I correct on that?


And in the same vain, could not Justice Hogg order 'the Fund", the McCanns, to file a claim against Halligan for all that money, that was donated ' to find Madeleine'.

Just thinking...

parapono


If I recall correctly Madeleine had to be removed as a plaintiff from the claim against Amaral for the very reason you state i.e. because she is a ward of court and the McCanns are not entitled to act on her behalf.

T4two

Posts : 166
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2012-01-22
Age : 68
Location : Germany

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum