The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.


Jill Havern
Forum owner

Kates CLEAR memory of what happened night 030507 - Truth of her lie

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Kates CLEAR memory of what happened night 030507 - Truth of her lie

Post by PeterMac on 12.05.13 18:23

@tigger wrote:No date on this, but must be after the front door was changed to the patio doors.... best friend Michelle Thompson -

Clearly needed a bit more adjustment, but in May, long before the video we already had the dramatic breeze hitting Kate in the face. Interesting that this comes from the companion of Jon Corner, the film maker.

But this statement was given in May 2008, a year later.
The Ch 4 documentary may have been prepared before that, in which case this statement may be another attempt to retro-fit.
And if there had ben a dramatic breeze into the face the curtains would have whooshed long before she got to the bedroom and the door woudl have slammed ditto.

And only Gerry said front door and then waited a week to change it to patio door
Kate (and Oldfield !) said patio door from the start.
No wonder the pJ were confused (if they were . . . !)

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 144
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Kates CLEAR memory of what happened night 030507 - Truth of her lie

Post by tigger on 12.05.13 18:34

@PeterMac wrote:
@tigger wrote:No date on this, but must be after the front door was changed to the patio doors.... best friend Michelle Thompson -

Clearly needed a bit more adjustment, but in May, long before the video we already had the dramatic breeze hitting Kate in the face. Interesting that this comes from the companion of Jon Corner, the film maker.

But this statement was given in May 2008, a year later.
The Ch 4 documentary may have been prepared before that, in which case this statement may be another attempt to retro-fit.
And if there had ben a dramatic breeze into the face the curtains would have whooshed long before she got to the bedroom and the door woudl have slammed ditto.

And only Gerry said front door and then waited a week to change it to patio door
Kate (and Oldfield !) said patio door from the start.
No wonder the pJ were confused (if they were . . . !)

Sorry! Scrolled through a mass of cuttings and only saw May missed the date. It struck me because the sequence of the b... breeze was changed. In her face as soon as she walked in. Dear me. The video was just about made by then or later? Version nr. 9 then?

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.

tigger

Posts : 8112
Reputation : 26
Join date : 2011-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Kates CLEAR memory of what happened night 030507 - Truth of her lie

Post by aiyoyo on 12.05.13 18:53

@PeterMac wrote:
@tigger wrote:No date on this, but must be after the front door was changed to the patio doors.... best friend Michelle Thompson -

Clearly needed a bit more adjustment, but in May, long before the video we already had the dramatic breeze hitting Kate in the face. Interesting that this comes from the companion of Jon Corner, the film maker.

But this statement was given in May 2008, a year later.
The Ch 4 documentary may have been prepared before that, in which case this statement may be another attempt to retro-fit.
And if there had ben a dramatic breeze into the face the curtains would have whooshed long before she got to the bedroom and the door woudl have slammed ditto.

And only Gerry said front door and then waited a week to change it to patio door
Kate (and Oldfield !) said patio door from the start.
No wonder the pJ were confused (if they were . . . !)

PM, how I wished you are an active Police on the Review Team.

Hmmm... err.....err... ahem... err.... do you think ...ahem...you can ask to rescind your retirement temporarily (tongue in cheek) and volunteer your service to the Team? lol

We need someone of your brilliant style analytical mind and skills to move forward this snail pace review....that looks as if it is never going to get to the finishing line...finalDestination - Court.
laugh

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Kates CLEAR memory of what happened night 030507 - Truth of her lie

Post by Monty Heck on 13.05.13 9:19

Newintown Yesterday at 12:54 pm


That assertion from Kate McCann also indicates that the abductor (if he went through the patio doors) shut the gate at the bottom of the stairs, shut the gate at the top of the stairs, shut the patio doors, shut the curtains before entering the bedroom to snatch Madeleine. What a tidy, fastidious abductor he was, to go to all that trouble when he only had a matter of a few minutes. He then presumably, if he went through the front door (car park entrance) with Madeleine - he obviously didn't use the window as Kate said that was a red herring - put the door key back on the kitchen work surface, isn't that where GA or the PJ found it?

Maybe that's why the PJ didn't believe the abductor nonsense, I dont blame them.

Precisely! KMcC having asserted that her child could not have wandered off because of the closed state of the curtains, doors, gates etc, cannot have failed to also conclude that no stranger abductor would have had time/interest in tidying the crime scene as he departed. If someone did actually go in and abduct M, then it was someone who knew there would be time to cover his tracks or whatever the idea of closing the curtains, doors, gates etc was. There were people in the group who were out of sight of the parents and in their flat in their absence yet these people are for some reason above suspicion. In that situation, it would be normal for any couple to even suspect each other if either were out of sight of the other for any time, even if only momentarily. The only way IMO, for this entire group to have been able to have confidence right from the start that none of them were involved when logic dictates that would be impossible to have known at that time, is if they did know what had happened and what followed was collusion.

As others have said, if we can see it why are SY spending milions and taking years going over files when they should be getting back to basics by reinterviewing this group to get to the bottom of what happened. If they are thoroughly investigated and ruled out, then so be it but it is unbeleivable that 6 years on there have apparently still to be background checks, and no computers were seized a la Murat. Why only his computers? He was not the only arguido and none of his friends were known to be be in the vicinity of this child when she disappeared yet the UK police have shown scant interest so far in the activities of the T9. Most odd.

Monty Heck

Posts : 470
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2012-09-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum