The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

There is a Little Girl Missing

Page 5 of 5 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: There is a Little Girl Missing

Post by marigold on 17.02.10 0:40

@jmbd wrote:That Madeleine has a mark in her eye.

Right. I've just replied to one of your posts on another thread about no mark in her eye but it now appears that you DO think she had one! So ignore my other post and can only assume you were being evasive in the other thread. Hadn't realised this was being discussed here.

marigold

Posts : 234
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2009-12-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: There is a Little Girl Missing

Post by aliberte2 on 18.02.10 2:57

@Autumn wrote:It is not absolutely certain that she had an eye defect - again, this may have been a ruse to make her a more marketable product. As the LP refused the PJ's request for Maddie's medical records, the columba could not be verified.

To Create One Marketing Product? The Look for Madeleine Sign?
We Think this Line of Speculation is Silly.
The Child Had An Eye Defect.
People Would Have Stampeded Themselves to Tell the Police If She did Not.

aliberte2

Posts : 365
Reputation : -1
Join date : 2009-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: There is a Little Girl Missing

Post by aliberte2 on 18.02.10 2:58

@Autumn wrote:
@aliberte2 wrote:
@Autumn wrote:Oh yes, the eye defect that the PJ warned the McCanns not to mention incase it put Madeleine at risk.

She Was Already in the Arms of an Abductor; Far More Important to Spread Whatever Readily Identifable marks necessary to Identify Her.
Perhaps if the PJ had Done their Job to Spread the Picture to Begin with the McCanns Wouldn't Have Done it on Their Own.
Again, you Don't Believe She was Abducted so the Eye Defect Doesn't matter.

What evidence do you have to back up your belief that 'she was already in the arms of an abductor'?

That Would be the Only Reason to Spread a Description.
If She Was Dead At the Hands of the McCanns She Could Not be At Risk.

aliberte2

Posts : 365
Reputation : -1
Join date : 2009-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 5 of 5 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum