The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hello!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When posting please be mindful that this forum is primarily about the death of a three year old girl.

Regards,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

The Creche Sheets

Page 9 of 9 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: The Creche Sheets

Post by roz on 11.02.17 10:12

I have just come across something from HideHo- so I have to do the same as her/him and retract my previous comments re cost of crèche.
by HiDeHo on 23.10.15 22:31
One thing I would like to correct is an earlier comment regarding creche charges...

I had posted this as it corresponded with the charges from when I posted earlier in the case...it was INCORRECT INFORMATION and I apologise... There were NO EXTRA CHARGES for the mini club in 2007. (Only Baby Club and Toddlers 1)  I haven't confirmed the day it started (January 2008 possibly)

roz

Posts : 69
Reputation : 16
Join date : 2016-11-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Creche Sheets

Post by Tony Bennett on 11.02.17 10:48

@NickE wrote:Has anyone had that the thought that CB was paid under the table for babysitting in the apartment on Sunday night and a accident occurred?
Sedation involved from the McC's
Cover up was needed for both, MW and McC?
@ NickE and recent contributors

Your post on 2 February has clearly moved along the discussion to very interesting and potentially highly significant issues...once again, thank you.

Along with everything else that's happened in the past 10 days or so, I completely missed these latest posts - until last night - and I have these observations to add.

First, I think it highly likely that there was a private arrangement between the McCanns and at least some of their Tapas 7 friends for Cat Baker, and maybe also Charlotte Pennington and Amy Tierney, to provide evening/night-time baby-sitting for them. The Ocean Club management may or may not have been aware of such arrangement.

Second, I note that these three: Cat, Charlotte, Amy, were the most active after the event in backing up the McCanns' account of events, especially Cat & Charlotte in relation to the alleged 'high tea' on Thursday c. 5/6pm. Also, I think I'm right in saying that Robert Murat interpreted all their witness statements.

Third, I think there are strong indications that the McCanns and Cat Baker, at least, knew each other prior to April 2007.

Fourth, it has long been my contention that if there was a cover-up of Madeleine's death, it would not need dozens of people to be involved any such cover-up. The leading actors may have been just, say: The Tapas 9, Cat Baker (and possibly two other nannies) and the Manager of the Ocean Club, who I think must have been informed late on Sunday that something very serious had happened.

Fifth, the call for Robert Murat to come to Praia da Luz, and the arrival of Resonate, probably on the Monday, can best be explained by a serious event occurring on the Sunday evening/night.

Sixth, the urgent change of plan regarding the Tapas restaurant booking could well alos b associated with some sudden event Sunday evening/night. 

Seventh, 'NickE', you were looking for Ocean Club 'phone records. I believe some of them, for 3rd and 4th May anyway, can be found at this link:

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CALLS_TO_GNR.htm

Eighth, a call was made from Ocean Club reception, before 9am on Friday 4 May, to a Bruna Lourenco. I believe it has been established that she is a relative of Nuno Lourenco, who fabricated an alleged kidnapping attempt by Polish holidaymaker Wojcheiech Krokowski. Possibly it is his mother. This could suggest Ocean Club complicity in the attempt made by Lourenco on the morning of Friday 4 May to implicate Krokowski as the abductor. (Even Textusa agrees with me on this by the way). The plot to implicate Krokowski miust have been worked out in advance. Lourenco had to:
a) get a photo of his hired car
b) supply a registration number, and
c) organize a CCTV image of him.
Plus, also, as we now know, his description of Krokowski matched Jane Tanner's (given on 4 May) in every details, down to the cloth clothes, the classic shoes, and of course the inevitable 'didn't look like a tourist' which, coincidentally, Martin Smith used 13 days later in his statement. Loruenco's fabrications fooled Amaral and his colleagues so much so that passengers were held in their plane at Berlin Airport and the PJ investigation was massively diverted on only its second full day.
The fact that someone at the Ocean Club 'phoned Lourenco's home early on 4 May could be very significant.

____________________


2007 (28 June) Dr Gerry McCann: “I have no doubt we will be able to sustain a high profile for Madeleine’s disappearance in the long-term”.

2017 (February) Dr Kate McCannthrust into a global bidding war…news giants battle to sign her up for the 10th anniversary…offered huge bids…bombarded with offers…30 sitting on the table…getting new bids every other day…one told Kate and Gerry: ‘Name your price!’
                        


Tony Bennett
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 14215
Reputation : 2401
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 69
Location : Harlow, Essex

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Creche Sheets

Post by MayMuse on 11.02.17 15:06

@Tony Bennett wrote:
@NickE wrote:Has anyone had that the thought that CB was paid under the table for babysitting in the apartment on Sunday night and a accident occurred?
Sedation involved from the McC's
Cover up was needed for both, MW and McC?
@ NickE and recent contributors

Your post on 2 February has clearly moved along the discussion to very interesting and potentially highly significant issues...once again, thank you.

Along with everything else that's happened in the past 10 days or so, I completely missed these latest posts - until last night - and I have these observations to add.

First, I think it highly likely that there was a private arrangement between the McCanns and at least some of their Tapas 7 friends for Cat Baker, and maybe also Charlotte Pennington and Amy Tierney, to provide evening/night-time baby-sitting for them. The Ocean Club management may or may not have been aware of such arrangement.

Second, I note that these three: Cat, Charlotte, Amy, were the most active after the event in backing up the McCanns' account of events, especially Cat & Charlotte in relation to the alleged 'high tea' on Thursday c. 5/6pm. Also, I think I'm right in saying that Robert Murat interpreted all their witness statements.

Third, I think there are strong indications that the McCanns and Cat Baker, at least, knew each other prior to April 2007.

Fourth, it has long been my contention that if there was a cover-up of Madeleine's death, it would not need dozens of people to be involved any such cover-up. The leading actors may have been just, say: The Tapas 9, Cat Baker (and possibly two other nannies) and the Manager of the Ocean Club, who I think must have been informed late on Sunday that something very serious had happened.

Fifth, the call for Robert Murat to come to Praia da Luz, and the arrival of Resonate, probably on the Monday, can best be explained by a serious event occurring on the Sunday evening/night.

Sixth, the urgent change of plan regarding the Tapas restaurant booking could well alos b associated with some sudden event Sunday evening/night. 

Seventh, 'NickE', you were looking for Ocean Club 'phone records. I believe some of them, for 3rd and 4th May anyway, can be found at this link:

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CALLS_TO_GNR.htm

Eighth, a call was made from Ocean Club reception, before 9am on Friday 4 May, to a Bruna Lourenco. I believe it has been established that she is a relative of Nuno Lourenco, who fabricated an alleged kidnapping attempt by Polish holidaymaker Wojcheiech Krokowski. Possibly it is his mother. This could suggest Ocean Club complicity in the attempt made by Lourenco on the morning of Friday 4 May to implicate Krokowski as the abductor. (Even Textusa agrees with me on this by the way). The plot to implicate Krokowski miust have been worked out in advance. Lourenco had to:
a) get a photo of his hired car
b) supply a registration number, and
c) organize a CCTV image of him.
Plus, also, as we now know, his description of Krokowski matched Jane Tanner's (given on 4 May) in every details, down to the cloth clothes, the classic shoes, and of course the inevitable 'didn't look like a tourist' which, coincidentally, Martin Smith used 13 days later in his statement. Loruenco's fabrications fooled Amaral and his colleagues so much so that passengers were held in their plane at Berlin Airport and the PJ investigation was massively diverted on only its second full day.
The fact that someone at the Ocean Club 'phoned Lourenco's home early on 4 May could be very significant.
If CB was babysitting and an accident occurred, why not report it?
If because Madeleine was sedated, how would CB be aware?

Why would the OC ( or anyone ) cover up an accident, surely they have insurances for such eventualities, it is a family holiday club. 
So there must be something more which links them all, which I have to admit I find baffling whether it be the swinging theory or paedophilia, either way all of those "reinforcements" for one little girls disappearance and the twists and tales that followed are remarkable. 

Must have missed the info of the phone call to Lourenço possible relative, very strange, and now cement she for me all the subsequent "not a tourist " , did the Pj pursue this call, or find out who was manning the desk at that time ? Many "hotel receptions" ( granted from my experience it may be the Uk ) have codes to press which shows who is using the phone or a number which gives an outside line to show non use from a member of staff, I wonder if the OC had a similar system?

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.”

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1331
Reputation : 977
Join date : 2016-04-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Creche Sheets

Post by noddy100 on 11.02.17 15:10

If there was an accident the first thing a babysitter may do is call the parents. They could have come back and 'took over' the situation and convinced CB that she could be in trouble so let them deal with it???

noddy100

Posts : 699
Reputation : 37
Join date : 2013-05-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Creche Sheets

Post by Tony Bennett on 11.02.17 15:44

@MayMuse wrote:
@Tony Bennett wrote:
@NickE wrote:Has anyone had that the thought that CB was paid under the table for babysitting in the apartment on Sunday night and a accident occurred?
Sedation involved from the McC's
Cover up was needed for both, MW and McC?
@ NickE and recent contributors

Your post on 2 February has clearly moved along the discussion to very interesting and potentially highly significant issues...once again, thank you.

Along with everything else that's happened in the past 10 days or so, I completely missed these latest posts - until last night - and I have these observations to add.

First, I think it highly likely that there was a private arrangement between the McCanns and at least some of their Tapas 7 friends for Cat Baker, and maybe also Charlotte Pennington and Amy Tierney, to provide evening/night-time baby-sitting for them. The Ocean Club management may or may not have been aware of such arrangement.

Second, I note that these three: Cat, Charlotte, Amy, were the most active after the event in backing up the McCanns' account of events, especially Cat & Charlotte in relation to the alleged 'high tea' on Thursday c. 5/6pm. Also, I think I'm right in saying that Robert Murat interpreted all their witness statements.

Third, I think there are strong indications that the McCanns and Cat Baker, at least, knew each other prior to April 2007.

Fourth, it has long been my contention that if there was a cover-up of Madeleine's death, it would not need dozens of people to be involved any such cover-up. The leading actors may have been just, say: The Tapas 9, Cat Baker (and possibly two other nannies) and the Manager of the Ocean Club, who I think must have been informed late on Sunday that something very serious had happened.

Fifth, the call for Robert Murat to come to Praia da Luz, and the arrival of Resonate, probably on the Monday, can best be explained by a serious event occurring on the Sunday evening/night.

Sixth, the urgent change of plan regarding the Tapas restaurant booking could well alos b associated with some sudden event Sunday evening/night. 

Seventh, 'NickE', you were looking for Ocean Club 'phone records. I believe some of them, for 3rd and 4th May anyway, can be found at this link:

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CALLS_TO_GNR.htm

Eighth, a call was made from Ocean Club reception, before 9am on Friday 4 May, to a Bruna Lourenco. I believe it has been established that she is a relative of Nuno Lourenco, who fabricated an alleged kidnapping attempt by Polish holidaymaker Wojcheiech Krokowski. Possibly it is his mother. This could suggest Ocean Club complicity in the attempt made by Lourenco on the morning of Friday 4 May to implicate Krokowski as the abductor. (Even Textusa agrees with me on this by the way). The plot to implicate Krokowski miust have been worked out in advance. Lourenco had to:
a) get a photo of his hired car
b) supply a registration number, and
c) organize a CCTV image of him.
Plus, also, as we now know, his description of Krokowski matched Jane Tanner's (given on 4 May) in every details, down to the cloth clothes, the classic shoes, and of course the inevitable 'didn't look like a tourist' which, coincidentally, Martin Smith used 13 days later in his statement. Loruenco's fabrications fooled Amaral and his colleagues so much so that passengers were held in their plane at Berlin Airport and the PJ investigation was massively diverted on only its second full day.
The fact that someone at the Ocean Club 'phoned Lourenco's home early on 4 May could be very significant.
If CB was babysitting and an accident occurred, why not report it?
If because Madeleine was sedated, how would CB be aware?

Why would the OC ( or anyone ) cover up an accident, surely they have insurances for such eventualities, it is a family holiday club. 

REPLY: Of course, the suggestion that Cat Baker, and/or any other nannies, were baby-sitting on the Sunday night, is pure conjecture - no more than a possibility.

But suppose she was.

If a very serious or fatal accident happened >>> then yes, CB reports this to parents. Suppose also this is a private arrangement. DISASTER for Mark Warner, they have employed a neglectful carer. DISASTER for McCanns - ditto. DISASTER for CB - ditto.  

If she fell into a coma or died as a result of sedatives administered by the McCanns >>> DISASTER for the McCanns, but CB in the clear, Mark Warner in the clear.

A third possibility would clearly be that a baby-sitter assaulted Madeleine. Then >>> DISASTER for CB, McCanns & Mark Warner. 


So there must be something more which links them all, which I have to admit I find baffling whether it be the swinging theory or paedophilia, either way all of those "reinforcements" for one little girls disappearance and the twists and tales that followed are remarkable. 

REPLY:  Agreed. I do not think that any of the above scenarios can go near to explaining why there was such a vast and immediate collection of top British politicans, senior government officials and the security services apparatus involved right from the very first day (and is STILL involved, 10 years on).

So, yes, we must look for something else. The evidence that the Make-Up/Lolita photo may have been taken on Sunday afternoon, 29 April, must be considered.


____________________


2007 (28 June) Dr Gerry McCann: “I have no doubt we will be able to sustain a high profile for Madeleine’s disappearance in the long-term”.

2017 (February) Dr Kate McCannthrust into a global bidding war…news giants battle to sign her up for the 10th anniversary…offered huge bids…bombarded with offers…30 sitting on the table…getting new bids every other day…one told Kate and Gerry: ‘Name your price!’
                        


Tony Bennett
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 14215
Reputation : 2401
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 69
Location : Harlow, Essex

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Creche Sheets

Post by Get'emGonçalo on 11.02.17 16:17

@noddy100 wrote:If there was an accident the first thing a babysitter may do is call the parents. They could have come back and 'took over' the situation and convinced CB that she could be in trouble so let them deal with it???


Really?

http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t2654-the-pearls-of-the-babysitter#64246

____________________
I'm not saying Gerry McCann is obsessed with what comes out in the media but Kim Jong-un thinks he needs to lighten up a bit.


Get'emGonçalo


Posts : 7645
Reputation : 3159
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: The Creche Sheets

Post by MayMuse on 11.02.17 17:45

@Tony Bennett wrote:
@MayMuse wrote:
@Tony Bennett wrote:
@NickE wrote:Has anyone had that the thought that CB was paid under the table for babysitting in the apartment on Sunday night and a accident occurred?
Sedation involved from the McC's
Cover up was needed for both, MW and McC?
@ NickE and recent contributors

Your post on 2 February has clearly moved along the discussion to very interesting and potentially highly significant issues...once again, thank you.

Along with everything else that's happened in the past 10 days or so, I completely missed these latest posts - until last night - and I have these observations to add.

First, I think it highly likely that there was a private arrangement between the McCanns and at least some of their Tapas 7 friends for Cat Baker, and maybe also Charlotte Pennington and Amy Tierney, to provide evening/night-time baby-sitting for them. The Ocean Club management may or may not have been aware of such arrangement.

Second, I note that these three: Cat, Charlotte, Amy, were the most active after the event in backing up the McCanns' account of events, especially Cat & Charlotte in relation to the alleged 'high tea' on Thursday c. 5/6pm. Also, I think I'm right in saying that Robert Murat interpreted all their witness statements.

Third, I think there are strong indications that the McCanns and Cat Baker, at least, knew each other prior to April 2007.

Fourth, it has long been my contention that if there was a cover-up of Madeleine's death, it would not need dozens of people to be involved any such cover-up. The leading actors may have been just, say: The Tapas 9, Cat Baker (and possibly two other nannies) and the Manager of the Ocean Club, who I think must have been informed late on Sunday that something very serious had happened.

Fifth, the call for Robert Murat to come to Praia da Luz, and the arrival of Resonate, probably on the Monday, can best be explained by a serious event occurring on the Sunday evening/night.

Sixth, the urgent change of plan regarding the Tapas restaurant booking could well alos b associated with some sudden event Sunday evening/night. 

Seventh, 'NickE', you were looking for Ocean Club 'phone records. I believe some of them, for 3rd and 4th May anyway, can be found at this link:

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CALLS_TO_GNR.htm

Eighth, a call was made from Ocean Club reception, before 9am on Friday 4 May, to a Bruna Lourenco. I believe it has been established that she is a relative of Nuno Lourenco, who fabricated an alleged kidnapping attempt by Polish holidaymaker Wojcheiech Krokowski. Possibly it is his mother. This could suggest Ocean Club complicity in the attempt made by Lourenco on the morning of Friday 4 May to implicate Krokowski as the abductor. (Even Textusa agrees with me on this by the way). The plot to implicate Krokowski miust have been worked out in advance. Lourenco had to:
a) get a photo of his hired car
b) supply a registration number, and
c) organize a CCTV image of him.
Plus, also, as we now know, his description of Krokowski matched Jane Tanner's (given on 4 May) in every details, down to the cloth clothes, the classic shoes, and of course the inevitable 'didn't look like a tourist' which, coincidentally, Martin Smith used 13 days later in his statement. Loruenco's fabrications fooled Amaral and his colleagues so much so that passengers were held in their plane at Berlin Airport and the PJ investigation was massively diverted on only its second full day.
The fact that someone at the Ocean Club 'phoned Lourenco's home early on 4 May could be very significant.
If CB was babysitting and an accident occurred, why not report it?
If because Madeleine was sedated, how would CB be aware?

Why would the OC ( or anyone ) cover up an accident, surely they have insurances for such eventualities, it is a family holiday club. 

REPLY: Of course, the suggestion that Cat Baker, and/or any other nannies, were baby-sitting on the Sunday night, is pure conjecture - no more than a possibility.

But suppose she was.

If a very serious or fatal accident happened >>> then yes, CB reports this to parents. Suppose also this is a private arrangement. DISASTER for Mark Warner, they have employed a neglectful carer. DISASTER for McCanns - ditto. DISASTER for CB - ditto.  

If she fell into a coma or died as a result of sedatives administered by the McCanns >>> DISASTER for the McCanns, but CB in the clear, Mark Warner in the clear.

A third possibility would clearly be that a baby-sitter assaulted Madeleine. Then >>> DISASTER for CB, McCanns & Mark Warner. 


So there must be something more which links them all, which I have to admit I find baffling whether it be the swinging theory or paedophilia, either way all of those "reinforcements" for one little girls disappearance and the twists and tales that followed are remarkable. 

REPLY:  Agreed. I do not think that any of the above scenarios can go near to explaining why there was such a vast and immediate collection of top British politicans, senior government officials and the security services apparatus involved right from the very first day (and is STILL involved, 10 years on).

So, yes, we must look for something else. The evidence that the Make-Up/Lolita photo may have been taken on Sunday afternoon, 29 April, must be considered.

Thank you for your response Tony, it does all appear to be extremely operational from day one But why continue for ten years, why has this particular child continually been almost force fed to the public from many avenues, other missing children have not been afforded the same or their parents touted like celebrities? If it is a case of national security in what capacity would that be, because of high profile persons connected?  Perhaps the link is something which would open another can of worms which the public cannot find out at any cost? The deception is so blatantly obvious, why not let it fade into the background, if all these "authorities" are trying to hide something bigger, why keep it up, surely they could have shut it down years ago, this is something which I've thought about often. This case in my opinion has made a laughing stock of the police force and the government. 

The makeup photo is a strange one, not least as to how it was released, but why, it is as if it was either a message to someone or to instill more confusion and suggestions that paedophillia may be involved. Is this a red herring? 


There seems to be many "directions" with many interferences, if it was a simple case of an accident surely there would be no requirements for such involvement, likewise IF an abduction! 

What sticks in my mind is the hand written Fund Bucket so readily made in those early days... when has any other missing child's family done that?

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.”

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1331
Reputation : 977
Join date : 2016-04-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Creche Sheets

Post by NickE on 11.02.17 20:22

@Tony Bennett wrote:
@MayMuse wrote:
@Tony Bennett wrote:
@NickE wrote:Has anyone had that the thought that CB was paid under the table for babysitting in the apartment on Sunday night and a accident occurred?
Sedation involved from the McC's
Cover up was needed for both, MW and McC?
@ NickE and recent contributors

Your post on 2 February has clearly moved along the discussion to very interesting and potentially highly significant issues...once again, thank you.

Along with everything else that's happened in the past 10 days or so, I completely missed these latest posts - until last night - and I have these observations to add.

First, I think it highly likely that there was a private arrangement between the McCanns and at least some of their Tapas 7 friends for Cat Baker, and maybe also Charlotte Pennington and Amy Tierney, to provide evening/night-time baby-sitting for them. The Ocean Club management may or may not have been aware of such arrangement.

Second, I note that these three: Cat, Charlotte, Amy, were the most active after the event in backing up the McCanns' account of events, especially Cat & Charlotte in relation to the alleged 'high tea' on Thursday c. 5/6pm. Also, I think I'm right in saying that Robert Murat interpreted all their witness statements.

Third, I think there are strong indications that the McCanns and Cat Baker, at least, knew each other prior to April 2007.

Fourth, it has long been my contention that if there was a cover-up of Madeleine's death, it would not need dozens of people to be involved any such cover-up. The leading actors may have been just, say: The Tapas 9, Cat Baker (and possibly two other nannies) and the Manager of the Ocean Club, who I think must have been informed late on Sunday that something very serious had happened.

Fifth, the call for Robert Murat to come to Praia da Luz, and the arrival of Resonate, probably on the Monday, can best be explained by a serious event occurring on the Sunday evening/night.

Sixth, the urgent change of plan regarding the Tapas restaurant booking could well alos b associated with some sudden event Sunday evening/night. 

Seventh, 'NickE', you were looking for Ocean Club 'phone records. I believe some of them, for 3rd and 4th May anyway, can be found at this link:

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CALLS_TO_GNR.htm

Eighth, a call was made from Ocean Club reception, before 9am on Friday 4 May, to a Bruna Lourenco. I believe it has been established that she is a relative of Nuno Lourenco, who fabricated an alleged kidnapping attempt by Polish holidaymaker Wojcheiech Krokowski. Possibly it is his mother. This could suggest Ocean Club complicity in the attempt made by Lourenco on the morning of Friday 4 May to implicate Krokowski as the abductor. (Even Textusa agrees with me on this by the way). The plot to implicate Krokowski miust have been worked out in advance. Lourenco had to:
a) get a photo of his hired car
b) supply a registration number, and
c) organize a CCTV image of him.
Plus, also, as we now know, his description of Krokowski matched Jane Tanner's (given on 4 May) in every details, down to the cloth clothes, the classic shoes, and of course the inevitable 'didn't look like a tourist' which, coincidentally, Martin Smith used 13 days later in his statement. Loruenco's fabrications fooled Amaral and his colleagues so much so that passengers were held in their plane at Berlin Airport and the PJ investigation was massively diverted on only its second full day.
The fact that someone at the Ocean Club 'phoned Lourenco's home early on 4 May could be very significant.
If CB was babysitting and an accident occurred, why not report it?
If because Madeleine was sedated, how would CB be aware?

Why would the OC ( or anyone ) cover up an accident, surely they have insurances for such eventualities, it is a family holiday club. 

REPLY: Of course, the suggestion that Cat Baker, and/or any other nannies, were baby-sitting on the Sunday night, is pure conjecture - no more than a possibility.

But suppose she was.

If a very serious or fatal accident happened >>> then yes, CB reports this to parents. Suppose also this is a private arrangement. DISASTER for Mark Warner, they have employed a neglectful carer. DISASTER for McCanns - ditto. DISASTER for CB - ditto.  

If she fell into a coma or died as a result of sedatives administered by the McCanns >>> DISASTER for the McCanns, but CB in the clear, Mark Warner in the clear.

A third possibility would clearly be that a baby-sitter assaulted Madeleine. Then >>> DISASTER for CB, McCanns & Mark Warner. 


So there must be something more which links them all, which I have to admit I find baffling whether it be the swinging theory or paedophilia, either way all of those "reinforcements" for one little girls disappearance and the twists and tales that followed are remarkable. 

REPLY:  Agreed. I do not think that any of the above scenarios can go near to explaining why there was such a vast and immediate collection of top British politicans, senior government officials and the security services apparatus involved right from the very first day (and is STILL involved, 10 years on).

So, yes, we must look for something else. The evidence that the Make-Up/Lolita photo may have been taken on Sunday afternoon, 29 April, must be considered.

Do you think it's just a coincident that "Anexo 37" (Tapas 9 phone contacts April 28-May 1) is a"missing file" or is it another sign that indicates that something happened on Sunday?

____________________
When asked if people will ever learn what really happened, Mr Amaral responded: “Yes, we will, when MI5 opens the case files, we will find out".

NickE

Posts : 955
Reputation : 271
Join date : 2013-10-27
Age : 42

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Creche Sheets

Post by Tony Bennett on 11.02.17 21:02

@MayMuse wrote:

Thank you for your response Tony, it does all appear to be extremely operational from day one But why continue for ten years, why has this particular child continually been almost force fed to the public from many avenues, other missing children have not been afforded the same or their parents touted like celebrities? If it is a case of national security in what capacity would that be, because of high profile persons connected?  Perhaps the link is something which would open another can of worms which the public cannot find out at any cost? The deception is so blatantly obvious, why not let it fade into the background, if all these "authorities" are trying to hide something bigger, why keep it up, surely they could have shut it down years ago, this is something which I've thought about often. This case in my opinion has made a laughing stock of the police force and the government. 

The makeup photo is a strange one, not least as to how it was released, but why, it is as if it was either a message to someone or to instill more confusion and suggestions that paedophillia may be involved. Is this a red herring? 

There seems to be many "directions" with many interferences, if it was a simple case of an accident surely there would be no requirements for such involvement, likewise IF an abduction! 

What sticks in my mind is the hand written Fund Bucket so readily made in those early days... when has any other missing child's family done that?
Many good questions and points there @ MayMuse - but few of which we can answer, all we can do is look for clues in all of this.

Here are a few clues IMO

1. The career of Clarence Mitchell.
2005 - moves from Chief Crime Correspondent at the BBC to head up Tony Blair's Media Monitoring Unit >>> May 2007 diverted to head up the 'Madeleine McCann-abduction' PR efforts (for 10 years now!) >>> David Cameron appoints him Deputy Director of Communications, under former News of the World Editor Andy Coulson, in 2010, to help his campaign to become Prime Minister >>> selected to become Conservative Party candidate at 2015 General Election. CONCLUSION: He is a big fish in a big pond and swims right alongside the highest figures in the British establishment  THEREFORE something very big indeed is involved

2. The strangely close nexus between the McCanns and Jim Gamble. I won't elaborate on that here but would refer you to Jill's recent piece on Gamble in 'Rogue of the Day' and my article on CMOMM: 'The McCanns and Jim Gamble - Joined at the Hip'
QUESTION: Why, why does Jim Gamble stick to the McCanns 'closer than a brother'?

3. The use to which the McCanns have been put...
A. Promoting various Missing Children schemes, like the Amber Alert scheme promoted by the European Union (the McCanns addressed the European Parliament I think in 2008)
B. Specifically, heavily promoting the controversial Missing Persons group as their Ambassador
C. Attacking 'internet trolls' and calling for a clampdown on  he internet, leading to the death of Brenda Leyland
D. Being used mightily as 'front man and woman' for the ghastly 'Hacked Off' campaign which aims to suppress press freedom, and
E. Raising lots of money - who really knows how much money has been raised and exactly where it has all gone?
CONCLUSION: Powerful people and organisations make use of the McCanns

____________________


2007 (28 June) Dr Gerry McCann: “I have no doubt we will be able to sustain a high profile for Madeleine’s disappearance in the long-term”.

2017 (February) Dr Kate McCannthrust into a global bidding war…news giants battle to sign her up for the 10th anniversary…offered huge bids…bombarded with offers…30 sitting on the table…getting new bids every other day…one told Kate and Gerry: ‘Name your price!’
                        


Tony Bennett
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 14215
Reputation : 2401
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 69
Location : Harlow, Essex

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Creche Sheets

Post by MayMuse on 11.02.17 21:33

@TonyBennett

Thank you the information, more food for thought. 
Money laundering and/or gathering and diverse tactics comes to mind. 


Connections, Portugal, Uk, Irish and Scottish. 
Who knew who where and when? 


Talk of Freemasons etc may be a remote link but not, I think the sole reason for such a cover up over a crime on a little girl, and what a crime it is in my opinion. 

Therefore whatever happened to Madeleine, needless to say to hide or even support the crime, could it have been been presented as an opportune time to do "big business"? 

Thinking outloud!

____________________
“Basically, I’m just an ordinary, straightforward guy who’s the victim of the biggest f***-up on this planet – if you’ll excuse the language.”

Robert Murat talking to David Jones, Daily Mail, 02 June 2007

MayMuse

Posts : 1331
Reputation : 977
Join date : 2016-04-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 9 of 9 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum