What was 5A really used for?
Page 53 of 53 •
1 ... 28 ... 51, 52, 53
Re: What was 5A really used for?

candyfloss- Super duper Moderator
- Posts: 7931
Join date: 2009-11-27
Age: 59
Re: What was 5A really used for?
candyfloss wrote:I don't judge anyone Daisy, and try to be fair to
everyone here. I am all for people having their say, but sometimes,
bringing up things from the past is not a good idea, as it only serves
to inflame things again. Any concerns please pm me.
It wasn't directed at you candyfloss, you have always been more than fair & balanced.
I'm just aware that everyone's not like you. So please do delete these last few posts for the sake of peace.
Daisy- Posts: 634
Join date: 2011-06-15
Location: Yorkshire, England
Re: What was 5A really used for?
As for the so called only one toothbrush between 3 children tale I do not believe it for one minute. Those children were apparently bathed every night and in bed by 7.30 yet they only had one toothbrush between them? Only one toothbrush in apartment 5A me thinks.
Finally, I remember reading that KM used to brush Madeleine's hair at bed time so where was the hairbrush when her DNA was required?
Again I am sorry if this is stuff that has been gone over many times before, as I say I am new here and am just trying to get answers to the few things that I cannot find answers too.
Hummingbird- Posts: 57
Join date: 2012-05-08
Location: Worcstershire
In/out
Hummingbird wrote:Hello everyone! Firstly sorry to bring this topic up again! Second, I am very new to this site and very nervous so bear with me please. I have followed this case from day one and have always had grave doubts about the abduction theory. Anyway having spent hours reading this particular thread I am astounded by what I have seen, new information I have not seen anywhere before and it has always been my belief that this apartment was not used as a lovely holiday home!! The one thing that I have always wanted to question is this (& I apologise if this has been done before) Mrs Fenn states that the crying stopped when the parents came home and she knew they had come home because she heard the patio doors open and close. How does she know 'someone' walked in to the apartment and NOT out of it! Just because the patio doors were opened and closed doesn't mean someone entered it! It conjures up some pretty horrific thoughts but I have to ask as it has been playing on my mind for so long. I am of the belief that all of the children were never, not even once left alone and that each night one of the adults would take their turn at staying with them all in one room. Trouble is why was one child apparently alone and crying in 5A on the Tuesday night?
As for the so called only one toothbrush between 3 children tale I do not believe it for one minute. Those children were apparently bathed every night and in bed by 7.30 yet they only had one toothbrush between them? Only one toothbrush in apartment 5A me thinks.
Finally, I remember reading that KM used to brush Madeleine's hair at bed time so where was the hairbrush when her DNA was required?
Again I am sorry if this is stuff that has been gone over many times before, as I say I am new here and am just trying to get answers to the few things that I cannot find answers too.
Hello Hummingbird!
I've asked the same question myself: apparently the patio doors were heard being closed; but no one looked if someone was actually entering or leaving. I see no reason at all, why it should be supposed that the crying ended with one or both of the parents coming in. There is not a shred of evidence to support this assumption. In fact, the parents have expressed their surprise that Maddy asked them why they hadn't come in when she was crying. This can only mean that they had not noticed she was or had been crying*.
If the crying sound was no longer heard after the doors closed, with someone leaving, that might well mean someone abruptly stifled the crying sound and left with the child. She might have been gagged, or her head might have been covered in something which did not let out any sounds. Or she could have been killed to shut her up. And then removed.
The sound appears to have stopped very suddenly. It has been remarked that a crying child usually sputters and hiccups for a while, but no mention of any additional sounds was made.
* or it could mean that the parents want us to believe that Maddie was alive to ask that question.

Portia- Posts: 139
Join date: 2012-02-06
Re: What was 5A really used for?
Portia wrote:Hummingbird wrote:Hello everyone! Firstly sorry to bring this topic up again! Second, I am very new to this site and very nervous so bear with me please. I have followed this case from day one and have always had grave doubts about the abduction theory. Anyway having spent hours reading this particular thread I am astounded by what I have seen, new information I have not seen anywhere before and it has always been my belief that this apartment was not used as a lovely holiday home!! The one thing that I have always wanted to question is this (& I apologise if this has been done before) Mrs Fenn states that the crying stopped when the parents came home and she knew they had come home because she heard the patio doors open and close. How does she know 'someone' walked in to the apartment and NOT out of it! Just because the patio doors were opened and closed doesn't mean someone entered it! It conjures up some pretty horrific thoughts but I have to ask as it has been playing on my mind for so long. I am of the belief that all of the children were never, not even once left alone and that each night one of the adults would take their turn at staying with them all in one room. Trouble is why was one child apparently alone and crying in 5A on the Tuesday night?
As for the so called only one toothbrush between 3 children tale I do not believe it for one minute. Those children were apparently bathed every night and in bed by 7.30 yet they only had one toothbrush between them? Only one toothbrush in apartment 5A me thinks.
Finally, I remember reading that KM used to brush Madeleine's hair at bed time so where was the hairbrush when her DNA was required?
Again I am sorry if this is stuff that has been gone over many times before, as I say I am new here and am just trying to get answers to the few things that I cannot find answers too.
Hello Hummingbird!
I've asked the same question myself: apparently the patio doors were heard being closed; but no one looked if someone was actually entering or leaving. I see no reason at all, why it should be supposed that the crying ended with one or both of the parents coming in. There is not a shred of evidence to support this assumption. In fact, the parents have expressed their surprise that Maddy asked them why they hadn't come in when she was crying. This can only mean that they had not noticed she was or had been crying*.
If the crying sound was no longer heard after the doors closed, with someone leaving, that might well mean someone abruptly stifled the crying sound and left with the child. She might have been gagged, or her head might have been covered in something which did not let out any sounds. Or she could have been killed to shut her up. And then removed.
The sound appears to have stopped very suddenly. It has been remarked that a crying child usually sputters and hiccups for a while, but no mention of any additional sounds was made.
* or it could mean that the parents want us to believe that Maddie was alive to ask that question.
Portia, Thanks for that, I have always believed IF the crying incident is true the reason why it stopped was not because the parents arrived home, I have to believe something far more sinister was taking place and something happened (planned or not) to make the crying stop so quickly. I do not believe it would have just stopped 'just like that' as soon as Mummy & Daddy arrived home, in fact I think it would have continued for quite some time as the child by now was so distressed, the relief of her parents coming back would have actually made her cry more and she would have been heard saying things like 'Mummy where have you been?' and so on.
I have often wondered if this was the night that she possibly injured herself whilst roaming the apartment and trying to find her parents, and if so the crying would continue until she was unable to cry anymore, not because someone had left or entered the apartment. Perhaps GM & KM came in, never checked the children, went to bed and didn't realise anything was 'wrong' until the morning. Then as with every theory I come up with that would mean all three children were actually there alone and not being looked after all together with the other children in another apartment, like I think is the more likely scenario!!
This case has given me a permanent headache since day one!!
Hummingbird- Posts: 57
Join date: 2012-05-08
Location: Worcstershire
Re: What was 5A really used for?
As for your other questions, I stand to be corrected here but I think that apparently as with the toothbrush, there was only one hairbrush between the 3 children also. Yawn. And her sandals as I recall were no good either as they were allegedly worn by her baby sister. Yawn. Hopefully someone can confirm this but some where amongst the reams of stuff I'm sure I read that. Which leads us to the question.....
Where were her trainers or shoes? She must have had a pair right, not just 1 pair of sandals for a whole week? Did she go to bed that night with her spare pair of shoes or trainers on? If that was all that was left I would have expected them to be taken by the police but don't recall their mention. And if they are not accounted for and that is the explanation, why did the *abductor* that JT is oh so certain she saw remove them?

monkey mind- Posts: 213
Join date: 2011-12-19
Page 53 of 53 •
1 ... 28 ... 51, 52, 53

