Portal
Home
Register
Log inDid Jim Gamble Sanitize Gerry McCann's CATS File 19309?
Page 1 of 4 • Share •
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4 
Did Jim Gamble Sanitize Gerry McCann's CATS File 19309?
Get 'em Gonçalo on Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:33 pm
Posted by Himself on Good quality wristbands
Because if he did, it would certainly be in keeping with all the other anomalous behavior exhibited by Jim Gamble regarding Arguido, Gerry McCann. (See Jim Gamble tag)
http://goodqualitywristbands.blogspot.com/2012/01/did-jim-gamble-sanitize-gerry-mccanns.html
Because if he did, it would certainly be in keeping with all the other anomalous behavior exhibited by Jim Gamble regarding Arguido, Gerry McCann. (See Jim Gamble tag)
http://goodqualitywristbands.blogspot.com/2012/01/did-jim-gamble-sanitize-gerry-mccanns.html
Get 'em Gonçalo- Forum Owner
- Posts: 3516
Join date: 2009-11-25 -
Re: Did Jim Gamble Sanitize Gerry McCann's CATS File 19309?
sharonl on Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:33 pm
"the reference for this conviction still exists in the judiscial reference files" 
sharonl- Co-Admin
- Posts: 1337
Join date: 2009-12-29 -
Re: Did Jim Gamble Sanitize Gerry McCann's CATS File 19309?
tigger on Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:41 am
The Sargeants Inn
Jim Gamble in Washington DC - Facing Up To Illicit Mimetic Desires
Author Blackwatch (of 12/04/2010 @ 09:59:26,
in News,
viewed 60 times)
Interesting that Jim Gamble - head of CEOPS - and the man alleged to have been appointed by the Home Office to write a preliminary review of the Madeleine McCann Investigation
should be in Washington DC today (Monday 12th April) as this is where
Kevin Halligen and his business partners Andre Hollis and Ken Irish
were residing until his run in with the FBI (in fact, this is where
Halligen was building his home).
According to Press Reports he is meeting with Facebook Officials to discuss 252 messages of concern
that remain unanswered and the practicality of a 'panic button' on the
website (which sounds fantastic if the button is going to be part of a
much more rigorous moderation procedure too - as on its own it seems a
bit gimmicky).
Facebook is owned by Rupert Murdcoh's News Corp. That it was founded at Harvard University
in Boston only compounds speculation that it has the backing of the CIA
as part of its data-mining (and policy shaping) activities. That it has
been successfully deployed in several policy making and concensus
building projects already will only throw more fuel on the fire (former
Defense advisor, Howard Cox of Greylock Venture Capital and In-Q-Tel - the Venture Capital Wing of the CIA - invested $27 million). Such concerns were raised in 2008 by Tom Hodgkinson of The Gurdian.
The
problem Gamble is likely to encounter is that if Facebook is being used
as part of data-mining and surveillance activities it really needs to
retain its illusion of being unpoliced. The alternative risks forcing
people underground and dispersed to various dark corners of cyberspace,
making surveillance virtually impossible.
One of its founders, Jim Breyer is also co-founder and CEO of the virtual banking system PayPal - the preferred payment method of websites like Three Arguidos and Find Madeleine. Another founder is Peter Thiel - a committed neoconservative and libertarian. Tom Hodgkinson explains:
Thiel's philosophical mentor is one René Girard of Stanford
University, proponent of a theory of human behaviour called mimetic
desire. Girard reckons that people are essentially sheep-like and will
copy one another without much reflection. The theory would also seem to
be proved correct in the case of Thiel's virtual worlds: the desired
object is irrelevant; all you need to know is that human beings will
tend to move in flocks. Hence financial bubbles. Hence the enormous
popularity of Facebook.
...snipped( re history of setting up two pop stars both owned by Sony)
They sit at their PC Terminals and somehow end up at
Facebook's door. These are new enchanted gardens where men and girls
come and go like moths among the whisperings and the champagne and
under the canopy of pixel holes and stars that make up their computer
screens. The forces exherted from either side propel them forward. And
because they are only given two options to choose from (both owned by
Sony Music) it is inevitable that both Sony artists will perform well
in the Xmas charts. The only choice open to the sheep, is which pen
they are herded into.
This is how easy it is to manage opinion and create policy. Does it remind you of anything else you've seen recently?
Facebook recently relocated its HQ to Dublin.
Oalkey International (with Andre Hollis and Timothy Unruh) and Oakley Strategic Services
(with Ken Irish) were both incorporated in Washington DC. Many of
Halligen's associates continue to work in the capital as Defense
Advisors and Lobbyists.
unquote
I found this on MM, since it's Sergeants, I'm sure it's OK to post?
I was actually looking for a poster some 8-10 months ago, who said that the file 19309 had been accessed some months before 3/5/07.
Just the right date I'd think.
Everything that happened before the holiday is imo far more important than 3/5 .
Jim Gamble in Washington DC - Facing Up To Illicit Mimetic Desires
Author Blackwatch (of 12/04/2010 @ 09:59:26,
in News,
viewed 60 times)
Interesting that Jim Gamble - head of CEOPS - and the man alleged to have been appointed by the Home Office to write a preliminary review of the Madeleine McCann Investigation
should be in Washington DC today (Monday 12th April) as this is where
Kevin Halligen and his business partners Andre Hollis and Ken Irish
were residing until his run in with the FBI (in fact, this is where
Halligen was building his home).
According to Press Reports he is meeting with Facebook Officials to discuss 252 messages of concern
that remain unanswered and the practicality of a 'panic button' on the
website (which sounds fantastic if the button is going to be part of a
much more rigorous moderation procedure too - as on its own it seems a
bit gimmicky).
Facebook is owned by Rupert Murdcoh's News Corp. That it was founded at Harvard University
in Boston only compounds speculation that it has the backing of the CIA
as part of its data-mining (and policy shaping) activities. That it has
been successfully deployed in several policy making and concensus
building projects already will only throw more fuel on the fire (former
Defense advisor, Howard Cox of Greylock Venture Capital and In-Q-Tel - the Venture Capital Wing of the CIA - invested $27 million). Such concerns were raised in 2008 by Tom Hodgkinson of The Gurdian.
The
problem Gamble is likely to encounter is that if Facebook is being used
as part of data-mining and surveillance activities it really needs to
retain its illusion of being unpoliced. The alternative risks forcing
people underground and dispersed to various dark corners of cyberspace,
making surveillance virtually impossible.
One of its founders, Jim Breyer is also co-founder and CEO of the virtual banking system PayPal - the preferred payment method of websites like Three Arguidos and Find Madeleine. Another founder is Peter Thiel - a committed neoconservative and libertarian. Tom Hodgkinson explains:
Thiel's philosophical mentor is one René Girard of Stanford
University, proponent of a theory of human behaviour called mimetic
desire. Girard reckons that people are essentially sheep-like and will
copy one another without much reflection. The theory would also seem to
be proved correct in the case of Thiel's virtual worlds: the desired
object is irrelevant; all you need to know is that human beings will
tend to move in flocks. Hence financial bubbles. Hence the enormous
popularity of Facebook.
...snipped( re history of setting up two pop stars both owned by Sony)
They sit at their PC Terminals and somehow end up at
Facebook's door. These are new enchanted gardens where men and girls
come and go like moths among the whisperings and the champagne and
under the canopy of pixel holes and stars that make up their computer
screens. The forces exherted from either side propel them forward. And
because they are only given two options to choose from (both owned by
Sony Music) it is inevitable that both Sony artists will perform well
in the Xmas charts. The only choice open to the sheep, is which pen
they are herded into.
This is how easy it is to manage opinion and create policy. Does it remind you of anything else you've seen recently?
Facebook recently relocated its HQ to Dublin.
Oalkey International (with Andre Hollis and Timothy Unruh) and Oakley Strategic Services
(with Ken Irish) were both incorporated in Washington DC. Many of
Halligen's associates continue to work in the capital as Defense
Advisors and Lobbyists.
unquote
I found this on MM, since it's Sergeants, I'm sure it's OK to post?
I was actually looking for a poster some 8-10 months ago, who said that the file 19309 had been accessed some months before 3/5/07.
Just the right date I'd think.
Everything that happened before the holiday is imo far more important than 3/5 .
____________________
What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account? Macbeth Act V
tigger- Posts: 5015
Join date: 2011-07-20
Re: Did Jim Gamble Sanitize Gerry McCann's CATS File 19309?
Advocatus on Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:50 am
Get 'em Gonçalo wrote:Posted by Himself on Good quality wristbands
Because if he did, it would certainly be in keeping with all the other anomalous behavior exhibited by Jim Gamble regarding Arguido, Gerry McCann. (See Jim Gamble tag)
http://goodqualitywristbands.blogspot.com/2012/01/did-jim-gamble-sanitize-gerry-mccanns.html
Dunno
but I bet he has the clout to do it, still very dodgy though
I would think it would need to be approved by mi5/gchq
just found this from 2010, on icke, to add to the mix....
The media virtually unanimously believe the McCanns are guilty.
The investigating police believe sincerely that the McCanns are guilty.
Personally i also believe they are guilty.
The McCanns are connected up to the hilt with the Labour government and although that in itself is not a crime, the current Labour government is the most corrupt in history and also one which has been involved in cover ups and judicial killings as well as massive fraud and illegal wars.
Gerry McCann is not the biological father of Madeline, she was born as the result of a sperm donor.
Again this does not make them guilty but it creates a motive especially as the twins are Gerry McCann's biological children.
The fact that the McCanns are using Carter-Ruck who are one of the most venomous solicitors firms in the UK. (I know them personally.)
And have sued and gagged anyone and everyone who has said anything against the McCanns.
It is almost like Holohoax all over again.
Websites have been shut down, newspapers have all made big payouts, etc.
As we have seen in the case of John Terry a gagging order usually denotes guilt.
And as we discovered Avram Grant's trips to the brothel after that too was claimed to be covered by privacy laws.
So in my view the precedent is that anyone who tries to shut up the media usually has something to hide.
The campaign that was kicked off instantly led me to believe something was wrong. The Tapas dishes had hardly been cleared away and instantly the McCanns had a website up an running with flash graphics and advanced functioning and donation accounts were already opened.
An advert was shown on tv and at wembley stadium within days.
An Labour government insider Clarence Mitchell gave up his £70K job to become their PR spin doctor.
Their body language looks to me like they are guilty.
Just like Amanda Knox when she was in court.
I just think they learned from the Labour Party how to lie and lie and lie again
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/04_03/GerryKateMcCannAP_468x372.jpg
____________________
"One good thing to come out of all this is that there is so much in the press, nobody knows what is true, and what isn't." - Gerry McCann: Police CATS (Case Administration and Tracking System) Number 19309 - NB: The 19309 number is still on the Police database, but all data within the file appears to have been ERASED...
Advocatus- Posts: 340
Join date: 2012-01-09
Gerry and the "paedophiles!!" claim
kikoraton on Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:00 pm
In a moment of clarity (or was it a mild fever?) last night, I realised why Gerry might have made such an early and strident claim that Madeleine had been "taken by paedophiles".
What other claim would have brought the Ambassador rushing down from Lisbon? Would "taken by a greasy stubble-chinned dropout" have had the desired effect?
Consider this, from Ray Wyre, now deceased:
"At one stage the Americans were so concerned about the role of British paedophiles in Portugal that I was approached about the targeting of schools there. International co-operation should be part of police thinking."
What if, there's a network extending from the Embassy through the Consulates down to convivial places such as the OC? The mention of "paedophiles" and whoooooooosh.............here comes the Diplomatic Brigade and here beginneth the Great Cover-up. At all costs, these people - however undesirable and held in contempt - must be handled with kid gloves. Must even be allowed to become celebrities and ambassadors of a sort.
Does that make sense, or am I still feverish?
What other claim would have brought the Ambassador rushing down from Lisbon? Would "taken by a greasy stubble-chinned dropout" have had the desired effect?
Consider this, from Ray Wyre, now deceased:
"At one stage the Americans were so concerned about the role of British paedophiles in Portugal that I was approached about the targeting of schools there. International co-operation should be part of police thinking."
What if, there's a network extending from the Embassy through the Consulates down to convivial places such as the OC? The mention of "paedophiles" and whoooooooosh.............here comes the Diplomatic Brigade and here beginneth the Great Cover-up. At all costs, these people - however undesirable and held in contempt - must be handled with kid gloves. Must even be allowed to become celebrities and ambassadors of a sort.
Does that make sense, or am I still feverish?
kikoraton- Researcher
- Posts: 590
Join date: 2010-10-13
Location: Catalunya, Spain
Re: Did Jim Gamble Sanitize Gerry McCann's CATS File 19309?
tigger on Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:30 pm
O, I think it's a very large part of the whole thing. However, the Ambassador wouldn't have come down without the FO telling him to do so. Ambassadors are just that - messenger boys.
As I'm convinced Maddie was dead very early on, it makes sense that HQ in London would know something was going on before 3/5.
Lisbon is a good three hours drive away. The Ambassador was called during the night - say at midnight. Unless they had his home number, that would get the duty officer who wouldn't wake up the Ambassador for a child just two hours gone. At the time they pushed the abduction but not the paedophile angle.
So, imo the earliest the Ambassador heard was at breakfast - I think it more likely that London phoned him and told him to get the hell over there. I think it was GB who phoned him - all trails lead to GB time and time again. The one person who could instruct the FO what to do very quickly.
Otherwise - if a request comes from lower down, it has to go up the hierarchical ladder. Takes time. Things moved so fast, it could only have come from the top.
As I'm convinced Maddie was dead very early on, it makes sense that HQ in London would know something was going on before 3/5.
Lisbon is a good three hours drive away. The Ambassador was called during the night - say at midnight. Unless they had his home number, that would get the duty officer who wouldn't wake up the Ambassador for a child just two hours gone. At the time they pushed the abduction but not the paedophile angle.
So, imo the earliest the Ambassador heard was at breakfast - I think it more likely that London phoned him and told him to get the hell over there. I think it was GB who phoned him - all trails lead to GB time and time again. The one person who could instruct the FO what to do very quickly.
Otherwise - if a request comes from lower down, it has to go up the hierarchical ladder. Takes time. Things moved so fast, it could only have come from the top.
____________________
What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account? Macbeth Act V
tigger- Posts: 5015
Join date: 2011-07-20
NO
Portia on Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:39 pm
kikoraton wrote:In a moment of clarity (or was it a mild fever?) last night, I realised why Gerry might have made such an early and strident claim that Madeleine had been "taken by paedophiles".
What other claim would have brought the Ambassador rushing down from Lisbon? Would "taken by a greasy stubble-chinned dropout" have had the desired effect?
Consider this, from Ray Wyre, now deceased:
"At one stage the Americans were so concerned about the role of British paedophiles in Portugal that I was approached about the targeting of schools there. International co-operation should be part of police thinking."
What if, there's a network extending from the Embassy through the Consulates down to convivial places such as the OC? The mention of "paedophiles" and whoooooooosh.............here comes the Diplomatic Brigade and here beginneth the Great Cover-up. At all costs, these people - however undesirable and held in contempt - must be handled with kid gloves. Must even be allowed to become celebrities and ambassadors of a sort.
Does that make sense, or am I still feverish?
There was no paedophilia in re.
If so, they would have shut up about it.
The fact they cried Wolf immediately almost proves something totally different was afoot.
Has anybody put forward that these paragons of virtue could have been so inebriated they simply offed their child, forgetting all about it afterwards?
As in: I am drunk, I come in, you are there, you ask me to stay with you because you have left me befire when I cried;
I am so into someone else, I would rather stay there than stay with you;
I ask you to shut up;
You keep on yelling at me;
I ask again, politely;
You keep on yelling;
I tell you to shut up;
You keep yelling;
I drag you from your bed;
You fight me, as you fought your grandmother in the 'birtdaycake picture', legs flying in all directions;
I am so drunk I almost drop you;
you keep yelling: Daddy Daddy:
I get a hold on you and I crush your ffing yelling head against the wall
Portia- Posts: 846
Join date: 2012-02-06
Re: Did Jim Gamble Sanitize Gerry McCann's CATS File 19309?
Ribisl on Tue Feb 28, 2012 12:03 am
tigger - So, imo the earliest the Ambassador heard was at breakfast - I think it more likely that London phoned him and told him to get the hell over there. I think it was GB who phoned him - all trails lead to GB time and time again. The one person who could instruct the FO what to do very quickly.
Couldn't it just be the case of GB & co pulling all the stops for a brother Mason? The Mccanns - the Lodge - the Catholic Church. Makes me shudder to think
____________________
There is a taint of death, a flavour of mortality in lies... Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad
Ribisl- Posts: 740
Join date: 2012-02-04
Re: Did Jim Gamble Sanitize Gerry McCann's CATS File 19309?
tigger on Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:41 am
Ribisl wrote:tigger - So, imo the earliest the Ambassador heard was at breakfast - I think it more likely that London phoned him and told him to get the hell over there. I think it was GB who phoned him - all trails lead to GB time and time again. The one person who could instruct the FO what to do very quickly.
Couldn't it just be the case of GB & co pulling all the stops for a brother Mason? The Mccanns - the Lodge - the Catholic Church. Makes me shudder to think
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-qX9ERql50
The above is GB and his master masonic handshake. Must have been on the square for a very long time.
You may be right, but in that case I also think that G must have done him a favour or two - Gerry can only have been very low down in the 'club' so why should GB so much more than necessary and say that it was a matter of national security?
This link is quite amusing but I agree with every word:
http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2011/10/who-does-this-remind-you-of.html?spref=fb.
Although the idea of the McCs having a substitute complicates matters, it would simplify the disposal of a body and the subsequent clean-up.
Imo the whole scheme could have been timed to curry favour with a large enterprise about to start. It backfired spectacularly and for reasons best known to GB et all, the cover-up was comprehensive and immediate.
I've always said that Gerry reminds me more of Delboy than anything else. Big ideas, badly executed.
____________________
What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account? Macbeth Act V
tigger- Posts: 5015
Join date: 2011-07-20
Re: Did Jim Gamble Sanitize Gerry McCann's CATS File 19309?
Ribisl on Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:32 am
tigger wrote:Ribisl wrote:tigger - So, imo the earliest the Ambassador heard was at breakfast - I think it more likely that London phoned him and told him to get the hell over there. I think it was GB who phoned him - all trails lead to GB time and time again. The one person who could instruct the FO what to do very quickly.
Couldn't it just be the case of GB & co pulling all the stops for a brother Mason? The Mccanns - the Lodge - the Catholic Church. Makes me shudder to think
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-qX9ERql50
The above is GB and his master masonic handshake. Must have been on the square for a very long time.
You may be right, but in that case I also think that G must have done him a favour or two - Gerry can only have been very low down in the 'club' so why should GB so much more than necessary and say that it was a matter of national security?
This link is quite amusing but I agree with every word:
http://onlyinamericablogging.blogspot.com/2011/10/who-does-this-remind-you-of.html?spref=fb.
Although the idea of the McCs having a substitute complicates matters, it would simplify the disposal of a body and the subsequent clean-up.
Imo the whole scheme could have been timed to curry favour with a large enterprise about to start. It backfired spectacularly and for reasons best known to GB et all, the cover-up was comprehensive and immediate.
I've always said that Gerry reminds me more of Delboy than anything else. Big ideas, badly executed.
GB is an ill tempered bully and a control freak who wouldn’t miss an opportunity like that to show who’s the boss because it makes him feel powerful and worthy. I don’t think it’s necessarily the case of him ‘returning a favour’ as you suggest.
I am mostly in agreement with you but I cannot get my head around the substitute theory because I don’t see the purpose of having a substitute. As for the idea that G was carrying a sub girl towards the beach so to be seen by some witnesses I am afraid it’s a pure fantasy unless I am missing something. It could have been G with M’s body (can't be that stupid as I said in another thread) or somebody with M (dead or alive), or some totally innocent father carrying his child home.
____________________
There is a taint of death, a flavour of mortality in lies... Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad
Ribisl- Posts: 740
Join date: 2012-02-04
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics» Can I File Bankruptcy?
» Admin DB( ya hamon file joke Admin Assistant )
» Did Jim Gamble Sanitize Gerry McCann's CATS File 19309?
» Gerry McCann's Blog
» The continuing love affair between Jim Gamble of CEOP and Dr Gerry McCann
» Admin DB( ya hamon file joke Admin Assistant )
» Did Jim Gamble Sanitize Gerry McCann's CATS File 19309?
» Gerry McCann's Blog
» The continuing love affair between Jim Gamble of CEOP and Dr Gerry McCann
Page 1 of 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum