Re: Playground Photo

by **Jill Havern** 10.09.15 18:38

I've separated the tennis photo discussion from the playground photo discussion and vice versa and put them in their correct threads.

Please keep on topic now.

by skyrocket 10.09.15 20:06

@ Tony Bennett

Thanks for that - apology accepted.

by Guest 10.09.15 20:39

skyrocket wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I've shown how convergence actually gives more credence to the dodgy photo argument.

No you didn't and no it doesn't.

So tell us about how even that grass area was.

We get it, shadows are not always where you expect them BUT they do follow the laws of physics.

Damn right.

In this photo, should two shadows converge within 2 metres - personally I don't think so.

So tell us about how even that grass area was.
Also why they would fake the shadows of two inconsequential people in the photo.

AGAIN, for the umteenth time, who knows if this photo has definitely been tampered with/created - I don't, you don't.

Yes but there is zero evidence that it has been tampered with, so I think the people who think it's not been tampered with are on a winner.

by skyrocket 10.09.15 22:46

@ BlueBag

Fine - if you think I didn't there we go, others can decide what they believe.

Grass - doesn't look like a farmers field to me, quite flat and level I would say.

No idea why anyone would fake anything - that doesn't mean they haven't; or have.

I agree - no evidence it has been tampered with; equally no evidence it hasn't.

Winning - I thought this was all about collating information and ideas to just possibly come up with something of value.
(Please no come backs about my points not adding anything of value - I'll take it as read that's what you think).

That'll have to do.

by Guest 11.09.15 6:55

skyrocket wrote:@ BlueBag
Grass - doesn't look like a farmers field to me, quite flat and level I would say.

It doesn't take much of an undulation to affect a shadow.
I've debated this with the "all the Apollo photos are fake because of the shadows" people for years.

No idea why anyone would fake anything - that doesn't mean they haven't; or have.

So you can't think why they would do that. Thanks.

I agree - no evidence it has been tampered with; equally no evidence it hasn't.

Great, no evidence it has been tampered with, thanks.

There is no evidence that one of the people on the left is an alien, you can't prove they are not.

Winning - I thought this was all about collating information and ideas to just possibly come up with something of value.
(Please no come backs about my points not adding anything of value - I'll take it as read that's what you think).

Something of value yes.
Zero evidence for a claim is not something of value.
I'm sure you would like your "points" to remain unchallenged.