Playground Picture

Page 2 of 8 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Playground Picture

Post  juliet on Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:46 pm

More and more, "premeditation" comes to mind.

juliet

Posts: 150
Join date: 2011-06-21

Back to top Go down

That photograph is highly suspect.

Post  tigger on Wed Sep 14, 2011 2:58 pm

juliet wrote:More and more, "premeditation" comes to mind.


Quite a few photographs have been proved to be faked with photoshopping. I pointed out earlier that photoshopping is a favourite tool for paedos, who can put themselves or children in all sorts of 'situations'.
The ice cream photo (above) is one of the worst with all sorts of inuendos. The arm doesn't belong to a toddler for a start.

Re the playground photo, yes loads of things wrong with it. It has a girl in pink, no proof at all that that is Maddie. Definitely not Amelie in the photo. I feel that the colour pink is rather rammed down our throats by Kate. Pink = Maddie, that's what we must think.
Bad news, Kate, we can think for ourselves. That photograph is so badly done, SY can't even use it as an example for their trainees, I'd wager.

____________________
What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account? Macbeth Act V

tigger

Posts: 5013
Join date: 2011-07-20

Back to top Go down

Re: Playground Picture

Post  candyfloss on Wed Sep 14, 2011 3:34 pm

tigger wrote:
juliet wrote:More and more, "premeditation" comes to mind.


Quite a few photographs have been proved to be faked with photoshopping. I pointed out earlier that photoshopping is a favourite tool for paedos, who can put themselves or children in all sorts of 'situations'.
The ice cream photo (above) is one of the worst with all sorts of inuendos. The arm doesn't belong to a toddler for a start.

Re the playground photo, yes loads of things wrong with it. It has a girl in pink, no proof at all that that is Maddie. Definitely not Amelie in the photo. I feel that the colour pink is rather rammed down our throats by Kate. Pink = Maddie, that's what we must think.
Bad news, Kate, we can think for ourselves. That photograph is so badly done, SY can't even use it as an example for their trainees, I'd wager.



tigger, you have stated this as a fact, when there is no actual proof of this is there, apart from discussions on forums?

____________________



candyfloss
Super duper Moderator

Posts: 11771
Join date: 2009-11-27
Age: 60

Back to top Go down

Re: Playground Picture

Post  Marian on Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:36 pm

I know what Juliet means by there being something unreal about this photo. I'm showing my age here alas but I'm reminded of the "fuzzy felt" toy where you made pictures by just plonking down shapes onto a board. The photo has this "thrown together" look about it with elements from different sources. It would be difficult to pose the way that "Madeleine" is - try it yourself, your hand would be palm upwards while hers appears to be palm downwards.

Marian

Posts: 1071
Join date: 2010-12-19
Location: England

Back to top Go down

Re: Playground Picture

Post  Smokeandmirrors on Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:45 pm

Playing devils advocate here, but surely the man in the playhouse could be seeing to their own child? Why is it assume he is spying on anyone?

____________________
The truth will out.

Smokeandmirrors

Posts: 1015
Join date: 2011-07-31

Back to top Go down

Re- Playground Photo-

Post  joan thomas on Wed Sep 14, 2011 5:24 pm

Never thought of the fact that the guy could be tending his own child, mind you
its a hell of a pose,must have frightened the sh---out of the poor little nipper!

Another thing if I had known there were experts in the field of photography on this site we would

have approached them for advice for our followers of our space phenomena photographs

now shown on over eight hundred channel's globally

Why do I get the feeling its a small nomber of admin who are the main

posters and not the hard slog researches who send in their post

Nice too lighten the discussion some times eh

joan thomas

Posts: 43
Join date: 2011-07-05

Back to top Go down

Photoshopping

Post  tigger on Wed Sep 14, 2011 6:46 pm

candyfloss wrote:
tigger wrote:
juliet wrote:More and more, "premeditation" comes to mind.


Quite a few photographs have been proved to be faked with photoshopping. I pointed out earlier that photoshopping is a favourite tool for paedos, who can put themselves or children in all sorts of 'situations'.
The ice cream photo (above) is one of the worst with all sorts of inuendos. The arm doesn't belong to a toddler for a start.

Re the playground photo, yes loads of things wrong with it. It has a girl in pink, no proof at all that that is Maddie. Definitely not Amelie in the photo. I feel that the colour pink is rather rammed down our throats by Kate. Pink = Maddie, that's what we must think.
Bad news, Kate, we can think for ourselves. That photograph is so badly done, SY can't even use it as an example for their trainees, I'd wager.



tigger, you have stated this as a fact, when there is no actual proof of this is there, apart from discussions on forums?


I've done quite a lot of photoshopping, but I'm also a figurative artist, so I'm always looking at the composition as a whole.
None of the four figures in the foreground are relating to each other at all. They all seem to be in their own world. The weird stance of the man by the playhouse, why interfere with that part of the photograph?
I'm not worried about the man looking through the playhouse, may just be looking for or at his child.
It's the pink girl who is too big if she stands up. It's Sean and the other toddler (not Amelie) not relating to each other either.
Gerry's stance doesn't relate to the girl in pink who is too close to him. His stance is related to something lower down.

I haven't run this one through a programme to see how many changes have taken place, a little complicated to do, but I'll try. Just wanted to let you know that it is a considered analysis and not based on wild surmise.

____________________
What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account? Macbeth Act V

tigger

Posts: 5013
Join date: 2011-07-20

Back to top Go down

Re: Playground Picture

Post  Smokeandmirrors on Wed Sep 14, 2011 6:50 pm

I have looked at that photo again and I am certain that person is looking inside at a child in there! I remember the days well when on many an afternoon at parks etc I would find myself playing games, hiding in playhouses, going down the slide, swinging on a rope to the amusement of my child! And the other parents at the park! I still do love it! Nothing like joining in and playing around.

____________________
The truth will out.

Smokeandmirrors

Posts: 1015
Join date: 2011-07-31

Back to top Go down

Re: Playground Picture

Post  Molly on Thu Sep 15, 2011 7:56 pm

Is he not looking at gorgeous Kate? Is Sean trying to catch Madeleine's shadow? Both he & Gerry seem to be fixated on the same thing and Lily is watching Gerry I think.

____________________
"It wasn't as bad as the night we found her"

Molly

Posts: 310
Join date: 2011-06-28

Back to top Go down

Re: Playground Picture

Post  Guest on Fri Sep 23, 2011 8:39 am

I read somewhere that the man with the weird leg , balled and sun glasses on the PDL playground phot where Murats friend Tuck Price. I'm not sure if that is the Ex-copper someone said he was identified as. ?

Im defently sure that Tuck Price and The playgroundphoto man is not one and the same. After seeing four pictures of him taken 3 weeks after the PDL picture, well he is just way to fat (the PDL playg.photo man) . If not he would have had to lost a lot of weight in only three weeks. They are both balled and were sunglasses, but the resemblance stops there.

[img][/img]

[img][/img]

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 8 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum