The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

Anonymous email

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Anonymous email

Post by Get'emGonçalo on Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:21 am

I've just received this anonymous email

I don�t know why you are encouraging Bennett to continue posting libellous and
inaccurate comments about the McCanns. The Portuguese Prosecutor concluded that
the McCanns were not guilty of any crime and so lifted the Arguido status.

Arguido DOES NOT mean prime suspect. It means �person of interest� to be
interviewed at length and committed to trial or released from Arguido status.

Bennett is continuing to lie to you. He states that there has been an EX-PARTE
Order made by another party against Bennett. Bennett states this is ominous but
does not spell out what it really means in legal terms.

An Ex-Parte Order takes immediate effect until the court case date, which
could be many months away. The other party has applied to the Court for an
immediate Ex-Parte Order to be heard within the next few days.

An Ex-Parte Order is usually some kind of restraining order and can come in many
different forms, depending on the request and the documents supporting the
request. Mr. Bennet does not have any right to be present at the ex-parte hearing,
but as a matter of courtesy the Judge will let him
know about the outcome as he will need to adhere to the terms once the Judge has
granted the Ex-Parte Order.

Under the terms of the Ex-Parte Order, once granted, Bennett may be placed under
curfew. He may be unable to leave his house until the Defamation Court Case
date. For example, he may be told to stay 50 miles away from various areas
permanently.

He may be barred from using the Internet for any purpose if that is what has
been requested. This could be temporary or permanent until an appeal by
Bennett.

You must hate Bennett more than life itself. He is continuing his
self-destruction and you are helping him, just as a person who helps a person
commit suicide.

Get'emGonçalo


Posts : 7111
Reputation : 2498
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by Guest on Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:45 am

Gerry's bored or Clarrie's had a few G&T's.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by happychick on Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:08 am





More likely to be the nutjobs from PFA.
I think both members are a bit bored over there with no one to talk to.

happychick

Posts : 394
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2011-06-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by Guest on Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:09 am

This should shut him up

Definition for arguido:

Arguido (male, ) or arguida (female, ), normally translated "named suspect" or "formal suspect", is a status in Portuguese language legal systems, including the legal systems of Portugal and Mozambique. It is given to a person whom the authorities suspect may have committed an offence. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arguido

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by Guest on Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:38 am

@happychick wrote:



More likely to be the nutjobs from PFA.
I think both members are a bit bored over there with no one to talk to.

strange times - just as even Libya gets free speech, it seems to be getting eroded in this country. What's the charge - "Encouraging a questioning mind and making people think? "

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by Gillyspot on Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:05 am

Well said Stewie!

Gillyspot

Posts : 1470
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2011-06-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by aiyoyo on Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:36 am

Get 'em Gonçalo wrote:I've just received this anonymous email

I don�t know why you are encouraging Bennett to continue posting libellous and
inaccurate comments about the McCanns. The Portuguese Prosecutor concluded that
the McCanns were not guilty of any crime and so lifted the Arguido status.

Arguido DOES NOT mean prime suspect. It means �person of interest� to be
interviewed at length and committed to trial or released from Arguido status.

Bennett is continuing to lie to you. He states that there has been an EX-PARTE
Order made by another party against Bennett. Bennett states this is ominous but
does not spell out what it really means in legal terms.

An Ex-Parte Order takes immediate effect until the court case date, which
could be many months away. The other party has applied to the Court for an
immediate Ex-Parte Order to be heard within the next few days.

An Ex-Parte Order is usually some kind of restraining order and can come in many
different forms, depending on the request and the documents supporting the
request. Mr. Bennet does not have any right to be present at the ex-parte hearing,
but as a matter of courtesy the Judge will let him
know about the outcome as he will need to adhere to the terms once the Judge has
granted the Ex-Parte Order.

Under the terms of the Ex-Parte Order, once granted, Bennett may be placed under
curfew. He may be unable to leave his house until the Defamation Court Case
date. For example, he may be told to stay 50 miles away from various areas
permanently.

He may be barred from using the Internet for any purpose if that is what has
been requested. This could be temporary or permanent until an appeal by
Bennett.

You must hate Bennett more than life itself. He is continuing his
self-destruction and you are helping him, just as a person who helps a person
commit suicide.

Well, if I am not wrong the mccanns used that {ex parte order) on Amaral.
And, we know the outcome of that don't we? It backfired and caused the mccanns more money.

An ex parte order is almost like a unilateral agreement with a judge but I cant see how that can apply to freedom of expression.

Generally it is used against spouse battler or child abuser to stop the person going near the partner or child.

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by sharonl on Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:10 am

Why does everything McCann have to be mysterious, anonymous or unknown or if their feeling partculary brave, a source close to the McCanns.


Mysterious benefactors

A source that cannot be named

Anonymous witnesses

A Mystery PI who delivered a letter from a dead paedophile

Unidentified bloggers and Twitter chimps


Always the secrecy - why?


If a child was missing and these people were genuinely doing everything that they possibly could to find her, and we were nothing more than a hindrance to them, why on earth don`t they stand up for what they believe in, give their names and don`t be afraid to identify themselves, come forward and stand up to us. Why do they choose anonimity, it almost looks as if they have something to hide. Don`t the McCanns want us to know who are supporting them? If not, why not?


Having said that, I suppose it would have been much better for the McCanns if they had kept the identity of some of the team to themselves.


Antonio Jiminez

Metodo 3

Kevin Halligen

Brian Kennedy

Freemason - who cannot be named at present

Leonor Cipriano

Marco Aragao Correia

Ian West

____________________
"WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER" - Rebekah Brooks to David Cameron

sharonl


Posts : 3565
Reputation : 419
Join date : 2009-12-30

View user profile http://www.cold2012.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by HotlipsHealy on Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:25 am

Even what they spend their fund money on is mysterious.
Apart from the obvious that is, Carter Ruck.
But what do we really know about what they've done to search for Madeleine, even that is a mystery.
What have their supporters done to find out what happened to Madeleine?

____________________

Kate McCann: It was our holiday too.


HotlipsHealy

Posts : 124
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-05-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by aiyoyo on Fri Aug 26, 2011 7:53 am

Well it's also a mystery why none of their supporter ever asked about the PIs work : what they'd been doing, what leads were found, and generally ask for an update. None of them seems interested to know about the search for Maddie.

All they have to show for the money spent on PIs is a few dodgy sightings with the latest Leh one even disputed by Leh Police. We have mc-spin been wheeled out of his hibernation place with some fairy tale story and it seems their cult supporters were satisfied with that - no questions asked about the controversy.

They are more worried about what people in blogosphere have to say about them that they monitor it like hawks - and this is behavior of people who have nothing to hide or fear. Why care what people say then?

Anyone who doesn't understand the meaning of 'exoneration' by dictionary definition is either intellectually challenged or blind to a cause. Nowhere in the files was it stated they are 'exonerated'

Far as I understand their arguidos status wasn't lifted but shelved along with the case. Parallelly should the case be reopened so will they be re-conferred. It's a case of so long as the case is open and remains open so will their status that explains why they didn't ask for the case to remain open. In fact they were desperate for it to be shelved yet they moan no police force is looking for her. How hypocrite is that?

So long as the case is unsolved suspects can never be exonerated until a court of law closes the case.
Until that happens mccanns and followers can preach till the cow comes home ...but they cant control people's belief. Dogs are more trust worthy - they dont lie - no need to - dogs have no motive or agenda to do that.

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by Guest on Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:27 pm

@HotlipsHealy wrote:Even what they spend their fund money on is mysterious.
Apart from the obvious that is, Carter Ruck.
But what do we really know about what they've done to search for Madeleine, even that is a mystery.
What have their supporters done to find out what happened to Madeleine?

I've been thinking (if that's allowed). Are the McCann's using the same person at CR, or different people, or even a whole team of people ?? Does anyone know who they are ?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by Gillyspot on Fri Aug 26, 2011 9:23 pm

[quote="Stella"]
@HotlipsHealy wrote:Even what they spend their fund money on is mysterious.
Apart from the obvious that is, Carter Ruck.
But what do we really know about what they've done to search for Madeleine, even that is a mystery.
What have their supporters done to find out what happened to Madeleine?

I've been thinking (if that's allowed). Are the McCann's using the same person at CR, or different people, or even a whole team of people ?? Does anyone know who they are ?[/quote]



Well considering no one in the media and even the CR website don't say they are doing anything re the McCanns it is impossible to know this time. Interesting that CR are keeping this quiet at this time isn't it (whilst the "review" is going on I mean).

Gillyspot

Posts : 1470
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2011-06-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by pauline on Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:01 am

i would imagine the people at Carter Ruck are Adam Tudor and Isobel Hudson. These are the CR lawyers Kate praises in the book. There would also possibly be less senior staff working on the Mccann's case as well.

See p 289 where she says this pair '.continue to do a vast amount of work for us, without payment, most of it quietly behind the scenes.'

pauline

Posts : 548
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-05-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by Gillyspot on Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:28 am

@pauline wrote:i would imagine the people at Carter Ruck are Adam Tudor and Isobel Hudson. These are the CR lawyers Kate praises in the book. There would also possibly be less senior staff working on the Mccann's case as well.

See p 289 where she says this pair '.continue to do a vast amount of work for us, without payment, most of it quietly behind the scenes.'



Why would CR work "without payment" and do it "quietly behind the scenes". Are they not a business and aren't businesses about MAKING MONEY or if they were doing it Pro Bono at the very least they would want the publicity about it.



Perhaps Kate means "without payment" from the fund. I.E. Payment may be made from somewhere else - question is where.


CR have even got their work for John Yates on their website. http://www.carter-ruck.com/Documents/Yates_Press_Release_210711.pdf

Gillyspot

Posts : 1470
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2011-06-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by pauline on Sat Aug 27, 2011 1:08 am

@Gillyspot wrote:
@pauline wrote:i would imagine the people at Carter Ruck are Adam Tudor and Isobel Hudson. These are the CR lawyers Kate praises in the book. There would also possibly be less senior staff working on the Mccann's case as well.

See p 289 where she says this pair '.continue to do a vast amount of work for us, without payment, most of it quietly behind the scenes.'



Why would CR work "without payment" and do it "quietly behind the scenes". Are they not a business and aren't businesses about MAKING MONEY or if they were doing it Pro Bono at the very least they would want the publicity about it.



Perhaps Kate means "without payment" from the fund. I.E. Payment may be made from somewhere else - question is where.


CR have even got their work for John Yates on their website. http://www.carter-ruck.com/Documents/Yates_Press_Release_210711.pdf


'Without payment' should mean exactly that - they are not paid by anyone whether out of the Fund or by a wealthy benefactor or by the McCanns personally (joke!).

But as we know what the 'truthful' book says may not always be the entire truth. I can accept that with all the work they have got from the McCanns, its possible they might have written off a few billable hours, or undertaken a small task and not sent a bill.

I suspect Kate was trying to play down the enormous fees they have earned from the many hours they must have spent on their affairs, by implying that Carter Ruck did a lot of the work pro bono.

pauline

Posts : 548
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-05-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by Guest on Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:13 am

@Gillyspot wrote:
@pauline wrote:i would imagine the people at Carter Ruck are Adam Tudor and Isobel Hudson. These are the CR lawyers Kate praises in the book. There would also possibly be less senior staff working on the Mccann's case as well.
See p 289 where she says this pair '.continue to do a vast amount of work for us, without payment, most of it quietly behind the scenes.'

Why would CR work "without payment" and do it "quietly behind the scenes". Are they not a business and aren't businesses about MAKING MONEY or if they were doing it Pro Bono at the very least they would want the publicity about it.

Perhaps Kate means "without payment" from the fund. I.E. Payment may be made from somewhere else - question is where.

CR have even got their work for John Yates on their website. [url=http://www.carter-ruck.com/Documents/Yates_Press_Release_210711.pdf
http://www.carter-ruck.com/Documents/Yates_Press_Release_210711.pdf[/quote[/url]]

Exactly Gillyspot. I think anyone who believes what Kate writes in her book, or that the likes of CR work for nothing, are a little shall we say, erm, mistaken.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by Guest on Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:19 am

@Gillyspot wrote:

Perhaps Kate means "without payment" from the fund. I.E. Payment may be made from somewhere else - question is where.

Exactly and that is a very good question Gillyspot. One that needs to be answered. Perhaps Tony could ask this question in his next letter to them, as surely, HE is entitled to find out who is paying for the legal action being taken against him !!!!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by lj on Sat Aug 27, 2011 3:37 am

Why did bring the money, that came in by publishing Kate's version of the truth, such a flurry of Carter-R's favorite "how to shut up everyone we don't like" activity?

If CR did everything for nor they did not have to wait.

First of all: CR has gotten a lot of free publicity, whatever Kate blabbers about "quietly behind the scenes", that often is the reasons for lawfirms to work for free: what they save in advertising is much more than the client could ever have paid.

Plus no doubt there will be a kind of "no cure no pay" or "expenses only" agreement. Their past has shown they don'yt care how the money comes in, or from who, so now we have to believe they protect 2 childneglectors out of the goodness of their hearts??

laugh laugh

____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?"  Gerry

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/?m=0

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

lj

Posts : 3275
Reputation : 148
Join date : 2009-12-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by HotlipsHealy on Sat Aug 27, 2011 3:40 am

Carter Ruck went through Kate's manuscript and didn't take that bit so it must be true.

____________________

Kate McCann: It was our holiday too.


HotlipsHealy

Posts : 124
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-05-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by lj on Sat Aug 27, 2011 3:43 am

Kate should sue CR for exposing her so badly as a bad story teller, an awful liar and the nauseating narcissist we already knew she was. iconbiggrin

____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?"  Gerry

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/?m=0

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

lj

Posts : 3275
Reputation : 148
Join date : 2009-12-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by pauline on Sat Aug 27, 2011 3:56 am

@HotlipsHealy wrote:Carter Ruck went through Kate's manuscript and didn't take that bit so it must be true.

Brilliant point!

Another thing. I know lots of legal people and they tell me you don't have to like or even believe your client - you just do the best you can within the law to get a result for them.

Whether Carter Ruck believes the Mccanns is another matter.

It is certainly good advertising for them - and law firms I believe are restricted by their professional body in how they advertise. They can't go into creative advertising.

So to get publicity for winning cases, settling before it goes into court, is good for them.

pauline

Posts : 548
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-05-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by greenwatch on Mon Sep 05, 2011 11:19 am

@sharonl wrote:Why does everything McCann have to be mysterious, anonymous or unknown or if their feeling partculary brave, a source close to the McCanns.


Mysterious benefactors

A source that cannot be named

Anonymous witnesses

A Mystery PI who delivered a letter from a dead paedophile

Unidentified bloggers and Twitter chimps


Always the secrecy - why?


If a child was missing and these people were genuinely doing everything that they possibly could to find her, and we were nothing more than a hindrance to them, why on earth don`t they stand up for what they believe in, give their names and don`t be afraid to identify themselves, come forward and stand up to us. Why do they choose anonimity, it almost looks as if they have something to hide. Don`t the McCanns want us to know who are supporting them? If not, why not?


Having said that, I suppose it would have been much better for the McCanns if they had kept the identity of some of the team to themselves.


Antonio Jiminez

Metodo 3

Kevin Halligen

Brian Kennedy

Freemason - who cannot be named at present

Leonor Cipriano

Marco Aragao Correia

Ian West


Well, to the outsider, the Madeleinefoundation appears to be an anonymous set-up. SharonL, you appear to have no role at all at MF, unless you include your secretive meetings at secretive places. Apart from Tony Bennett, no other member wanted to show their face on camera in Bristol. So you are a little hypocritical by judging others when you are anonymous yourself.

Your Contact Tab only has an email address and a mobile phone number, both of which cannot be verified as being attached to an organisation or company.

You have no Core Group of Leaders
(at least none are named on the Contact Tab)


You appear to have no organizational structure and no long term goals. There is a lot of criticism of personalities and companies which does not seem to fall into any slot for any purpose. What is the general public supposed to gain from the reports which have been posted. Unless you spell out your reasons the public is none the wiser and they will move on.

greenwatch

Posts : 5
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-08-31

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by Me on Mon Sep 05, 2011 6:02 pm

@greenwatch wrote:
@sharonl wrote:Why does everything McCann have to be mysterious, anonymous or unknown or if their feeling partculary brave, a source close to the McCanns.


Mysterious benefactors

A source that cannot be named

Anonymous witnesses

A Mystery PI who delivered a letter from a dead paedophile

Unidentified bloggers and Twitter chimps


Always the secrecy - why?


If a child was missing and these people were genuinely doing everything that they possibly could to find her, and we were nothing more than a hindrance to them, why on earth don`t they stand up for what they believe in, give their names and don`t be afraid to identify themselves, come forward and stand up to us. Why do they choose anonimity, it almost looks as if they have something to hide. Don`t the McCanns want us to know who are supporting them? If not, why not?


Having said that, I suppose it would have been much better for the McCanns if they had kept the identity of some of the team to themselves.


Antonio Jiminez

Metodo 3

Kevin Halligen

Brian Kennedy

Freemason - who cannot be named at present

Leonor Cipriano

Marco Aragao Correia

Ian West


Well, to the outsider, the Madeleinefoundation appears to be an anonymous set-up. SharonL, you appear to have no role at all at MF, unless you include your secretive meetings at secretive places. Apart from Tony Bennett, no other member wanted to show their face on camera in Bristol. So you are a little hypocritical by judging others when you are anonymous yourself.

Your Contact Tab only has an email address and a mobile phone number, both of which cannot be verified as being attached to an organisation or company.

You have no Core Group of Leaders
(at least none are named on the Contact Tab)


You appear to have no organizational structure and no long term goals. There is a lot of criticism of personalities and companies which does not seem to fall into any slot for any purpose. What is the general public supposed to gain from the reports which have been posted. Unless you spell out your reasons the public is none the wiser and they will move on.

But since when has the Madeleine Foundation actively sought and received hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of pounds of public donations?

The requirement for transparency is greater in an organisation that professes to be a “not for profit” company / pseudo charity, no?

There is a huge difference between the aims of either organisation and as a consequence the comparison you have made is grossly invalid.

Nice attempt though.

Me

Posts : 683
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-05-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by Tony Bennett on Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:05 pm

Well, to the outsider, the Madeleine Foundation appears to be an anonymous set-up.

Hardly. There are several names of members on our website.

SharonL, you appear to have no role at all at MF, unless you include your secretive meetings at secretive places. Apart from Tony Bennett, no other member wanted to show their face on camera in Bristol. So you are a little hypocritical by judging others when you are anonymous yourself.

Your Contact Tab only has an email address and a mobile phone number, both of which cannot be verified as being attached to an organisation or company.

Unfortunately, given the conduct of several McCann-believers over the past 4 years, members are understandably reluctant to be publicly identified.

You have no Core Group of Leaders (at least none are named on the Contact Tab)

You appear to have no organizational structure and no long term goals.

Our long-term goals are clearly set out in our Constitution which is on our website.

There is a lot of criticism of personalities and companies which does not seem to fall into any slot for any purpose. What is the general public supposed to gain from the reports which have been posted.

A lot of (useful) knowledge.

Unless you spell out your reasons the public is none the wiser and they will move on.[/quote]

Tony Bennett
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 13964
Reputation : 2141
Join date : 2009-11-26
Age : 69
Location : Harlow, Essex

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Anonymous email

Post by Gillyspot on Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:42 pm

Well done to both "Me" and Tony for excellent replies to Greenwatch!

Gillyspot

Posts : 1470
Reputation : 3
Join date : 2011-06-13

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum