The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hello!

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When posting please be mindful that this forum is primarily about the death of a three year old girl.

Regards,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

What have we not been allowed to see

View previous topic View next topic Go down

What have we not been allowed to see

Post by Guest on 05.08.11 12:07

Missing on the 29th April
Tennis list
Tapas list
Jellyfish crèche list for the morning session
OC daily run report

Missing on the 30th April
Tennis list
Tapas list
OC daily run report

Missing on the 2nd May
OC daily run report

Missing on the 3rd May
Jellyfish crèche list for the morning session

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: What have we not been allowed to see

Post by Guest on 05.08.11 12:12

I think that all the missing pieces of information from the 29th and the 30th, at the very least means something very significant happend very early on in that holiday.
Remember Kiko's theory of death on the 28th/29th.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: What have we not been allowed to see

Post by Guest on 05.08.11 13:39

I don't think that the records were ever taken for Tennis for the other days. They are not on the missing records section. The pages go from 656 to 658 and 655 & 659 relate to other OC documents. There is a conflict between Katie's book & Dan's statement for Thursday.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: What have we not been allowed to see

Post by Guest on 05.08.11 13:48

The missing list as seen on PJfiles, is a compilation of what various people have noticed missing. It is not a factual account of what is really missing, as only the PJ will know this.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: What have we not been allowed to see

Post by jd on 05.08.11 16:19

Isn't the list of guests at the resort from May 2nd also missing?

This is the one which I'd like most to see as it could be very revealing with who I think is booked in on this date

____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare

jd

Posts : 4152
Reputation : 17
Join date : 2011-07-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: What have we not been allowed to see

Post by Guest on 05.08.11 16:37

@jd wrote:Isn't the list of guests at the resort from May 2nd also missing?

This is the one which I'd like most to see as it could be very revealing with who I think is booked in on this date

Yes jd, the report that should have been 'printed' on the 2nd is missing. But if someone checked in on that date and stayed, it would show up on the 3rd.

What we cannot tell at the moment, is who was already booked in when they arrived on the 28th and checked out before the 1st, which could be interesting.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: What have we not been allowed to see

Post by jd on 05.08.11 16:42

From the lists I have seen, it looks as though there are only part of all guests at the resort. mainly because they are just one page and my understanding is that OC is quite a big resort

I think I will study them again!

____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare

jd

Posts : 4152
Reputation : 17
Join date : 2011-07-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: What have we not been allowed to see

Post by Daisy on 05.08.11 17:20

@jd wrote:From the lists I have seen, it looks as though there are only part of all guests at the resort. mainly because they are just one page and my understanding is that OC is quite a big resort

I think I will study them again!

Hey jd, I found this blog useful in filling in some of the pieces about the OC/Mark Warner set-up.

So who REALLY owns the Ocean Club? A Complex Question Revisited.

http://www.thesargeants.net/dblog/articolo.asp?articolo=215

Daisy

Posts : 1245
Reputation : 5
Join date : 2011-06-15
Location : Yorkshire, England

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: What have we not been allowed to see

Post by jd on 05.08.11 17:30

Thanks Daisy. I will read it through with great interest. Maybe it find a few more pieces of the jigsaw

____________________
Who pulled the strings?...THE SYMINGTONS..And the Scottish connections...Look no further if you dare

jd

Posts : 4152
Reputation : 17
Join date : 2011-07-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: What have we not been allowed to see

Post by Guest on 06.08.11 8:34

@jd wrote:From the lists I have seen, it looks as though there are only part of all guests at the resort. mainly because they are just one page and my understanding is that OC is quite a big resort

I think I will study them again!

This is a link to all the lists available in our Research & Analysis Library on page 1. Each day consists of 4 pages.

http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t2127-ocean-club-daily-run-reports

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: What have we not been allowed to see

Post by Guest on 06.08.11 16:16

Stella wrote:Missing on the 29th April
Tennis list
Tapas list
Jellyfish crèche list for the morning session
OC daily run report

Missing on the 30th April
Tennis list
Tapas list
OC daily run report
Having both of these reports missing from the files, it is impossible to determine who might have been staying out there and checked out of the resort, by the end of the day on the 30th.

This is crucial information, if Madeleine died on the night of the 28th, or in the early hours of the 29th.

Possible suspects and accomplices will have gone under the radar...

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

E-mail

Post by Guest on 08.08.11 20:29

Portugese PM on reasons for archiving:

"The other element that led the McCanns to being made arguidos, an email that was considered as compromising, would also end up being discarded as an element of evidence.

According to the document, even if the couple was responsible for their daughter's death, it would have to be explained under which circumstances that happened, namely, how, when, what for and with what help."


Also interestingly:

"Among the motives to consider that the couple had no responsibilities in their daughter's disappearance, the PM points out, in the archiving dispatch, that none of them was in the apartment when the child disappeared."


Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum