The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

If the McCanns are innocent....

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Get'emGonçalo on 28.11.09 22:50

...except for leaving three children alone to their fate, then who is wrong?

1. Amaral
2. Georges Moreas, Honorary Chief Commissioner of the National French Police
3. Paulo Sargento, Forensic Psychologist
4. Martin Grime, Expert dog handler
5. Eddie and Keela, British sniffer dogs - the pride of South Yorkshire
6. Christian Ludke, Criminal Psychologist
7. Manuel Catriano
8. Sofia Leal
9. The Smiths
10. The Gaspars
11. Lawyer João Grade
12. Tavares Almeida
13. Barrister Michael Shrimpton
14. Francisco Moita Flores
15. The Pope who took down reference to the McCanns from Vatican website
16. Francisco Moita Flores
17. Fernando Pinto Monteiro, Portuguese Attorney General
18. Portuguese Attorney General
19. John Stalker, former Deputy Chief Constable
20. Guilhermino Encarnacao


Quotes by these people can be found on my blog http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.com/

-----

Why would all these people be so terribly wrong about what happened to Maddie, yet murat_fan isn't?

Discuss.

Get'emGonçalo


Posts : 7115
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 28.11.09 23:18

100% the mcanns paved the way for the abductor imagining there was one.
They also hindered the investigation.
They also put Madeleine at risk with publicising her eye defect.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Get'emGonçalo on 28.11.09 23:20

Wrong answer.

The question was: Why are all those people wrong about Maddie, but murat_fan isn't.

Get'emGonçalo


Posts : 7115
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 28.11.09 23:22

I cant be doing that..Im too stoned. drunken

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 28.11.09 23:23

That's easy.

Muratfan wears blinkers. lol!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 28.11.09 23:27

JKH wrote:...except for leaving three children alone to their fate, then who is wrong?

1. Amaral made a pot of money out of being wrong
2. Georges Moreas, Honorary Chief Commissioner of the National French Police a nobody with little grasp of the case
3. Paulo Sargento, Forensic Psychologist a TV talking head and hired mouth
4. Martin Grime, Expert dog handler never said the McCanns are guilty of anything but has made claims about his dogs that he cant substantiate
5. Eddie and Keela, British sniffer dogs - the pride of South Yorkshire dogs cant talk
6. Christian Ludke, Criminal Psychologist a nutter who has said such outrageous things he should be sectioned himself
7. Manuel Catriano never heard of it
8. Sofia Leal Gonc's wife - see 1 above
9. The Smiths which one? the one who thought he had seen Gerry, but wasnt sure, or all the others who didnt agree?
10. The Gaspars which one? the overwrought crazy woman or the husband who didnt even think they were talking about kids?
11. Lawyer João Grade who has had a distinctly fishy about turn about so many things
12. Tavares Almeida Gonc's old buddy who wrote a 'final report' which was submitted 11 months before the investigation was closed
13. Barrister Michael Shrimpton he thinks the East Germans did it Jill, do keep up
14. Francisco Moita Flores another paid talking head and PJ apologist, who made a shedload from his own book wooky
15. The Pope who took down reference to the McCanns from Vatican website I dont think you can claim the Pope as an anti Jill, he wouldn't like that
16. Francisco Moita Flores you already did him - see 14 - no double counting
17. Fernando Pinto Monteiro, Portuguese Attorney General never heard him say they dun it - he wouldnt be so stupid
18. Portuguese Attorney General you already did him - see 17 - remember, no double counting
19. John Stalker, former Deputy Chief Constable made one comment two years ago when they had been made arguidos and has STFU since
20. Guilhermino Encarnacao actually long suspected of being a 'mole' in the investigation who gave info to the McCanns


Quotes by these people can be found on my blog http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.com/

-----

Why would all these people be so terribly wrong about what happened to Maddie, yet murat_fan isn't?

Discuss.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 28.11.09 23:31

As above.

Except to add Amaral is a convicted liar, a proven bully who threatens people. A officer who is corrupt.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 28.11.09 23:32

Does he rip through people bins?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 28.11.09 23:33

Ask him. Police officers have had to do it as well i believe. Mind you the fat layabout probably got someone else to do it, whilst he went for a three hour lunch.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by scrafen on 28.11.09 23:33

JKH wrote:...except for leaving three children alone to their fate, then who is wrong?

1. Amaral
=> usually wrong (cipiriano etc); couldnt even figure who killed his dog. ok unfair - maybe it was him.

2. Georges Moreas, Honorary Chief Commissioner of the National French Police
=> he may comment, after he got his french cases straight ?


3. Paulo Sargento, Forensic Psychologist
=> the "swinger" one (on tv he said, the info was from a forum : ), so not rocketscience why he believes they have dun it... )

4. Martin Grime, Expert dog handler
=> his dogs are his business; can he give an unbiased opinion ?


5. Eddie and Keela, British sniffer dogs - the pride of South Yorkshire
=> a dog is a dog...and a coconut a coconut...

6. Christian Ludke, Criminal Psychologist
=> he doesnt state anything as fact, he makes clear its his opinion

7. Manuel Catriano
=> who ?


[strike]8. Sofia Leally
=> expert in tasteless sunglasses, but thats it


9. The Smiths
=> errr. MR. smith, the others were too embarrassed to state anything

10. The Gaspars
=> probably still hiding behind the sofa, after her utterly embarrasing self-statement was published; mr. gaspar does not confirm his wifes statement.

11. Lawyer João Grade
=> what evidence does he bring up ?


12. Tavares Almeida
=> the one who made millions out of joana cipriano ? who is still not found either ?

13. Barrister Michael Shrimpton
=> what does he have a clue of ? was he there, did he witness, did he interview ?

14. Francisco Moita Flores
=> cant sort him in

15. The Pope who took down reference to the McCanns from Vatican website
=> they also burned jeanne darc, galileo galilei etc, nostradamus, blaise pascal, isaac newton, johannes keppler...

16. Francisco Moita Flores
=> 14 still dont know who he is : )

17. Fernando Pinto Monteiro, Portuguese Attorney General
=> he said, there is no evidence ?

18. Portuguese Attorney General
=> 17


19. John Stalker, former Deputy Chief Constable
=> doesnt have evidence

20. Guilhermino Encarnacao
=> was this beowulf ?


Quotes by these people can be found on my blog http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.com/

-----

Why would all these people be so terribly wrong about what happened to Maddie, yet murat_fan isn't?

Discuss.

scrafen

Posts : 167
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 28.11.09 23:34

murat_fan wrote:Ask him. Police officers have had to do it as well i believe. Mind you the fat layabout probably got someone else to do it, whilst he went for a three hour lunch.
Yes they do it as part of their job description...not for the hell of it. And I doubt its something they are proud of..

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 28.11.09 23:36

sym wrote:
murat_fan wrote:Ask him. Police officers have had to do it as well i believe. Mind you the fat layabout probably got someone else to do it, whilst he went for a three hour lunch.
Yes they do it as part of their job description...not for the hell of it. And I doubt its something they are proud of..

I would say they would be proud of it if they got evidence to nail someone.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Get'emGonçalo on 28.11.09 23:41

Ok then, here's the next question:

Why won't the McCanns request the investigation is reopened when they say no one in authority is looking for Maddie?

Get'emGonçalo


Posts : 7115
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 28.11.09 23:45

It was inan interview when they said they did (Sky i think)

Also the PJ have made it clear they will not re-open it.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 28.11.09 23:52

sym wrote:
murat_fan wrote:Ask him. Police officers have had to do it as well i believe. Mind you the fat layabout probably got someone else to do it, whilst he went for a three hour lunch.
Yes they do it as part of their job description...not for the hell of it. And I doubt its something they are proud of..
Even Jessica Fletcher would baulk at that little number..its appalling. And its none of your business to do it..or whatver freak from over there did.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 28.11.09 23:59

No one can get the case reopened without new evidence.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 29.11.09 0:38

Sabot wrote:No one can get the case reopened without new evidence.

The McCann's could have asked for it to be kept open after they had their arguido status removed.
Didn't they have 28 days ( or something close) in which to request it?
Why didn't they?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Get'emGonçalo on 29.11.09 7:01

@Mumbles wrote:
Sabot wrote:No one can get the case reopened without new evidence.

The McCann's could have asked for it to be kept open after they had their arguido status removed.
Didn't they have 28 days ( or something close) in which to request it?
Why didn't they?

Exactly, mumbles. The McCanns let the deadline pass.

Maddie's own parents and her grandparents and her aunts and uncles - all of them let the deadline pass and not one of them asked for the investigation into Madeleine McCann remain open.

Get'emGonçalo


Posts : 7115
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Mike on 29.11.09 7:13

is murat-fan a real idiot or playing at it.murat-fan stop reading the papers i think thats where you are going wrong Laughing
the mccscums are as guilty as hell and deep in your heart you know it to.

Mike

Posts : 161
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Get'emGonçalo on 29.11.09 7:22

Here's another question:

John "It's not bad for a bunch of amateurs" McCann gave up his full time job within a very short space of time to be a director of the Fund. He did this despite having a wife and children to support - and, presumably, a mortgage.

How did he know Maddie wouldn't be found the next day?

Get'emGonçalo


Posts : 7115
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Mike on 29.11.09 7:48

JKH wrote:Here's another question:

John "It's not bad for a bunch of amateurs" McCann gave up his full time job within a very short space of time to be a director of the Fund. He did this despite having a wife and children to support - and, presumably, a mortgage.

How did he know Maddie wouldn't be found the next day?

yes jill good old brother john,now thats a question i would like to know the answer too.a lot was said in the begining
that is worth going back and having another read off

Mike

Posts : 161
Reputation : 2
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 29.11.09 10:44

@Mumbles wrote:
Sabot wrote:No one can get the case reopened without new evidence.

The McCann's could have asked for it to be kept open after they had their arguido status removed.
Didn't they have 28 days ( or something close) in which to request it?
Why didn't they?

What would have been the point if there was no new evidence? The PJ had hardly covered themselves with glory on the evidence they already had.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 29.11.09 11:03

Sabot wrote:
@Mumbles wrote:
Sabot wrote:No one can get the case reopened without new evidence.

The McCann's could have asked for it to be kept open after they had their arguido status removed.
Didn't they have 28 days ( or something close) in which to request it?
Why didn't they?

What would have been the point if there was no new evidence? The PJ had hardly covered themselves with glory on the evidence they already had.
WTF do you mean whats the point.....Madeleine, their first born child who they claim is with paedos.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Get'emGonçalo on 29.11.09 11:13

Sabot, I have to agree with sym... your comment really was a WTF moment Shocked

Get'emGonçalo


Posts : 7115
Reputation : 2504
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/

Back to top Go down

Re: If the McCanns are innocent....

Post by Guest on 29.11.09 11:17

Thats the thing, there is no logic or reason with them who support the McCanns.. Evil or Very Mad

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum