Jane Tanner Liar
Page 9 of 12 •
1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 
Re: Jane Tanner Liar
FatherC wrote:I think Jane Tanner's "sighting" is a nonsense but it is not fair to attribute something to her which she did not in fact say. There appears to be no record of her saying the man she saw "was carrying a bundle, maybe a blanket" and if there isn't 21 reasons really should not be saying that there is.
Seems like she told that she saw pink/white pyjamas bear feet and all that in the first interview with police may 4th. Not something she made up long after as some claime. Tough im not sure what she said to the police same night it happened. She might not been so clear then? anyone know? Im very sure she lies anyway..To dark and to short time to get all those details I think...And to remember it all so clear and hour later as well...
LG78- Posts: 146
Join date: 2011-08-10
Re: Jane Tanner Liar
FatherC wrote:I think Jane Tanner's "sighting" is a nonsense but it is not fair to attribute something to her which she did not in fact say. There appears to be no record of her saying the man she saw "was carrying a bundle, maybe a blanket" and if there isn't 21 reasons really should not be saying that there is.
Well, she can't have convinced GM can she, he didn't seem very sure, because he states in this video " a man probably carrying a child" plus the piece in the article I posted about a man carrying a bundle..........................
[youtube][/youtube]
With erm, probably carrying a child.

candyfloss- Super duper Moderator
- Posts: 11771
Join date: 2009-11-27
Age: 60
Re: Jane Tanner Liar
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/Tanner4of7_HO4.pdf
“Dark colours, but again it was, I think it was quite dark, so dark, sort of darkish jacket but then a more, a lighter trouser but a horrible colour, again this is, sort of a yellowy dark browny, horrible, but not, not a nice colour trousers, but then I wonder whether that was the lights making them look, making them look more of a sort of a mustard, it wasn’t mustard because that’s too bright, but it was just like a, as I say they weren’t nice, they weren’t the sort of clothes I’d expect somebody on a MARK WARNER holiday to, they was, I can’t think of the material, I tried to describe this before, but sort of a cottony material but baggy”.
The lights were yellow and if they distorted the colour of the "abductor's" trousers I don't understand how she can be so sure about Madeleine's white & pastel pink pyjamas
____________________
"It wasn't as bad as the night we found her"
Molly- Posts: 310
Join date: 2011-06-28
Re: Jane Tanner Liar
Molly wrote:Jane's statement:
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/Tanner4of7_HO4.pdf
“Dark colours, but again it was, I think it was quite dark, so dark, sort of darkish jacket but then a more, a lighter trouser but a horrible colour, again this is, sort of a yellowy dark browny, horrible, but not, not a nice colour trousers, but then I wonder whether that was the lights making them look, making them look more of a sort of a mustard, it wasn’t mustard because that’s too bright, but it was just like a, as I say they weren’t nice, they weren’t the sort of clothes I’d expect somebody on a MARK WARNER holiday to, they was, I can’t think of the material, I tried to describe this before, but sort of a cottony material but baggy”.
The lights were yellow and if they distorted the colour of the "abductor's" trousers I don't understand how she can be so sure about Madeleine's white & pastel pink pyjamas
How on earth from that distance and in that light can you possibly ascertain what sort of material his trousers were. How can you tell material from a distance?

candyfloss- Super duper Moderator
- Posts: 11771
Join date: 2009-11-27
Age: 60
From Police files
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1594
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1595
06_VOLUME_VIa_Page_1596
PJ informational documents
Another missive from the National Directorate in Lisbon, this one dated 25 May
2007 and which starts by saying - 21 days into the investigation ' witness
testimony has revealed the description of an individual having been seen
carrying a child next to apartment 5A of the Luz Ocean Club.
It continues by venturing to suggest a press release ' in fact an appeal to the
person fitting the following description "Caucasian person, 35 to 40 years of
age, of medium build, 1,70/75m tall, with short hair on the head but covering
the neck area, wearing a dark-coloured wind-breaker/sports jacket/coat, cloth
trousers of clear colour (beige or golden) and black shoes."
... who was walking in the Praia da Luz area on 3 May 2007, at about 21h30, and
possibly carrying a child, or some object that could be confused with a child,
to please contact the Police to clarify the truth of the situation. The appeal was extended to anyone else having seen the person described, in the area at the time given above, to contact the Police on the numbers provided in
the appeal.
Again, appropriate action was left to the consideration and determination of the
leader of the investigation.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/EXTERNAL.htm#p2p309
Page 1592
LG78- Posts: 146
Join date: 2011-08-10
Re: Jane Tanner Liar
LG78 wrote:
... who was walking in the Praia da Luz area on 3 May 2007, at about 21h30, and
possibly carrying a child, or some object that could be confused with a child,
And Jane Tanner's memory improved from this to knowing that it was a female child who was wearing pink pyjamas with turnups like Madeleine was wearing. (Even though she only saw the child from the feet and Madeleine's pj bottoms were white).

Gillyspot- Posts: 1269
Join date: 2011-06-13
Re: Jane Tanner Liar
Gillyspot wrote:LG78 wrote:
... who was walking in the Praia da Luz area on 3 May 2007, at about 21h30, and
possibly carrying a child, or some object that could be confused with a child,
And Jane Tanner's memory improved from this to knowing that it was a female child who was wearing pink pyjamas with turnups like Madeleine was wearing. (Even though she only saw the child from the feet and Madeleine's pj bottoms were white).
Yeah her memory worked oppsite of everyone else, remembering more instead of less.
The most cruisal thing I think is the fact that the "child" if carried away like Tanner says,and if that was Madeleine, her head should have been where the feets where. If not the abducter would have had to turn her around at some point. And why didnt she wake up? Why didnt the twins wake up sooner? If she was druged , say by a shot of medicine or something, that would give the abducter even less time. First injecting the drug without her waking up and scream, and the drug needs some time to start work. And also, why would an abducter carrie a child like Tanner describes? Making her more visible, and its heavier and absolutly no good way to carrie a child if you are in a hurry...
LG78- Posts: 146
Join date: 2011-08-10
Re: Jane Tanner Liar
Page 2533
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/SERVICE_INFORMATION.htm#p3p747
LG78- Posts: 146
Join date: 2011-08-10
Re: Jane Tanner Liar
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/SERVICE_INFORMATION.htm#p3p747[/quote[/url]]LG78 wrote:Strangely, Kate also made several requests, three months after the disappearance of Madeleine, that the police should take blood, hair and nail tests of Madeleine's twin siblings, because, as she said, she remembered that on the day of Madeleine's disappearance, in spite of all the commotion and noise made by the authorities and other persons who were looking for Madeleine in apartment 5A of the OC, the twins never woke up, having been transported to another apartment, they remained asleep, due to which she now presumes that they were under the effect of some sedative drug that a presumed abductor had administered to the three children in order to be able to abduct Madeleine, a situation which Kate refers to being possible according to what she read in a criminal investigation manual given to her by the British authorities, that would have been the procedure of the abductor in the real case involving abduction, rape and murder of the girl.
Page 2533
[url=http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/SERVICE_INFORMATION.htm#p3p747
Her audacity astounds me, does she think we're all bl**ding stupid. My God, this woman really takes the biscuit in excuses. I dread to think what excuse she would make up if anything happened to one of the twins.
Any mother who has 2 children who do not wake up amongst a commotion, knowing your daughter had just been abducted, would immediately wake the twins to make sure they're OK, or to have them checked over by a doctor or even to ask them if they saw or heard anything, but not K McCann. The fact that she is a qualiied GP and comes up with this rubbish is really scary.
These are the actions of someone who knows their daughter hasn't been abducted and the fact that she and probably G administered something to the twins not to wake up so their ME TIME WITH THE FRIENDS THEY'RE SO INTO wouldn't be interrupted.


Newintown- Posts: 593
Join date: 2011-07-19
Re: Jane Tanner Liar
I too would have had them checked out, and I would have woken them to hear what happened, if needed together with a special trained interrogator for children.
Kate and Gerry both prove time after time they must be lousy doctors.
____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?"
Gerry, (this man is a doctor!!)

lj- Posts: 793
Join date: 2009-12-01
Page 9 of 12 •
1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 
Similar topics» Who called Jane Tanner at 4.12 in the early hours of the 29th and why?
» Irish witness - does this make Jane Tanner a Liar?
» The day when Jane Tanner sobbed - and told all to 'The Sun'
» Jane Tanner shows us how she carried 'the child'


