The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

McCann Exposure Carter Rucked and now for a second time!

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: McCann Exposure Carter Rucked and now for a second time!

Post by Martin_Jones on 05.06.11 23:54

@AskTheDogsSandra wrote:Wasn't it Mike Gunnill who also set up Mr Bennett for Carter Ruck using false names?

wow

I believe it was Gunnill who Mr Bennett sent a copy of the banned leaflet to, yes. Mr Bennett should have known better really even if he knew that it was a set up or a trap as he should not have played into their hands.
Mr Bennett should have known btter really as he was a respected Solicitor i read.

Martin_Jones

Posts : 4
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-06-04

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Loathsome characters

Post by Marian on 06.06.11 12:09

Sorry M Jones but I can't make any excuses for the likes of Mike Gunnill and his ilk, they make my flesh crawl.

Marian

Posts : 1147
Reputation : 5
Join date : 2010-12-19
Location : England

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Devious

Post by Tony Bennett on 06.06.11 21:49

@AskTheDogsSandra wrote:Wasn't it Mike Gunnill who also set up Mr Bennett for Carter Ruck using false names?
Exactly right.

He wrote e-mails to me under the false name of 'Michael Sangerte, Berkshire', imploring me to send him a '60 Reasons' book. When I refused, he whined that he couldn't get one anywhere, was doing 'historical research' and would 'be prepared to pay a very high price' for a copy.

I obtained one for him, charged him £5 including postage - and as soon as he got it he leaked this to his good mates 'murarfan', 'bonnybraes' and fellow McCann-believers, boasting that he'd taken it in to Carter-Ruck the very same day he'd received it, and claiming under yet another of his false ID's that he was 'on a mission'.

I think I published the full correspondence on another thread on this site, some months ago.

For some strange reason Mike Gunnill's professional website featured wall-to-wall pics of him at Haut de la Garenne, the children's care home on Jersey where so many children suffered appalling acts of abuse for decades.

His other names include Jason Peters and Peter Tarwin.

The man is very very devious.

Tony Bennett
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 13966
Reputation : 2141
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 69
Location : Harlow, Essex

View user profile

Back to top Go down

McCann supporters - a

Post by Marian on 06.06.11 21:55

Mike Gunnill - another "fine upstanding citizen" who is part of the weird and not very wonderful world of the McCanns.

Marian

Posts : 1147
Reputation : 5
Join date : 2010-12-19
Location : England

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Carter-Ruck v McCann-Exposure: Round 2

Post by Tony Bennett on 06.06.11 22:09

candyfloss wrote:It seems mccannexposure has been Carter Rucked for a second time...

http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2011/06/04/mccann-exposure-is-carter-rucked-for-a-second-time/

MCCANN-EXPOSURE's reply in full - with added comments in red:

QUOTE

Re: Carter Ruck’s correspondence to WordPress.com dated 3rd June 2011, regarding Gerald and Kate McCann – Defamation, Harassment and Copyright complaint.

As outlined in our previous correspondence, Carter Ruck does not have authority to ascertain whether Gerald and Kate McCann were complicit in their daughter’s disappearance or possible death. McCann Exposure contends that there appears to be little evidential support for the abduction thesis.

Or 'assumption' or 'hypothesis' to use the words used by Clarence Mitchell himself in an interview with Radio Humberside on 6 January 2011

This is a view shared by many others, including members of the official investigation team. The foundation of the abduction thesis appears to rely heavily on the reported sighting of the McCann couple’s friend, Jane Tanner. A sighting that has significantly developed in detail in the mind of the witness as time has passed by; quite a remarkable phenomenon per se. Quite possibly the only verifiable facts in the case is that Madeleine McCann is missing and that her parents choose to leave her largely unattended with her younger siblings for five consecutive evenings in May 2007. The latter of which is an action that can result in criminal proceedings of parental neglect in the USA, UK and similar proceedings in Portugal. Further, that the circumstances under which Madeleine disappeared and what subsequently happened remain a complete mystery (a term recently used by the McCann couple’s spokesperson, Clarence Mitchell).

He used that term in a Channel 4 interview in March 2010.

Carter Ruck’s allegation that Mr. Anthony Bennett is “jointly responsible” for McCann Exposure is both unfounded and untrue. McCann Exposure suspects that this untruth likely emanated from agents of certain forums dedicated to seeking out and passing on information of possible defamatory comments made by Mr. Bennett to Carter Ruck. It is not McCann Exposure’s intention to imply that these agents receive monetary gain for their actions. To be clear, at no time has Mr. Bennett published articles at McCann Exposure, nor does he have access to the administration panel of McCann Exposure. He has submitted several comments on various articles; an action that any person visiting the blog can make should they so wish. McCann Exposure is not affiliated to Mr. Bennett or The Madeleine Foundation, or any of its individual members.

All of that is 100% correct.

Nonetheless, information of Carter Ruck’s planned complaints and intended actions of others relating to Mr. Bennett are appreciated.

Uh oh.

In respect of the article that Carter Ruck cite as constituting defamation and harassment, McCann Exposure argues that the UK media first reported that The Madeleine Foundation was possibly planning a leaflet distribution around the time of Mrs. McCann’s book release. Sadly, the UK media is decidedly selective and biased in what is published at any given time. Whilst McCann Exposure has empathy for any parent that suffers the loss of a child, regardless of the circumstances in which the loss occurs, it is imperative that the fundamental human right in the practice of freedom of thought and expression and equality in access to information in order to formulate informed opinion is acknowledged. McCann Exposure, therefore, argues that they have the right to hold, freely express and publish opinion that covers all aspects of the case. Including those that question the claim that Madeleine McCann was abducted under circumstances posited by the McCann couple and others; notably the McCann couple’s private investigators.

More of less stating the law on freedom of speech as guaranteed by Articles 8 to 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

As stated in our previous correspondence to Carter Ruck, dated the 3rd June, McCann Exposure’s chief objective is to provide a chronological archive of articles on what is arguably the most controversial and unprecedented child disappearance case of contemporary times. Thus, the vast majority of the articles published serve to document in full the twists and turns in the McCann case. McCann Exposure publishes and allows discussion on all aspects of the case. Publication covers a wide range of material, including that which frames the McCann’s in a positive light. It is a fact, however, that there are many commentators and researchers that vigorously challenge the abduction thesis. In light of this and McCann Exposure‘s objectives, Carter Ruck is hereby informed that McCann Exposure is not prepared to remove any articles published merely because the McCann couple and others do not wish for all aspects of the case to be considered.

How can the McCanns, Carter-Ruck or the Courts for that matter stop people from publishing, say, a list of all the obvious contradictions in the accounts of the McCanns and the 'Tapas 9'. Or showing a video of Eddie and Keela in action? Or publishing a full copy of Tavares de Almeida's damning police report of 10 September 2007?

In respect to copyright infringement, McCann Exposure has reviewed the McCann couple and Jon Corner’s concerns and can confirm the following:

Photographs of Madeleine to which the McCann couple holds copyright have been removed.

The photograph of Madeleine contained in the article “Terence Backer, the Independent gives his view on the McCann’s choice of photo“, has been removed and replaced with a link to an external hosting site.

A video containing material to which Jon Corner holds copyright has been removed.

Is this the 'viral video' that one-time CEOP Director Jim Gamble promoted and which a million-plus people have already seen via the internet? Yet Corner claims 'copyright' on it and won't allow it on the 'McCann-Exposure' blog?

In addition to Carter Ruck’s complaint, a further article on McCann Exposure contained said video; this too has been removed and replaced with an external link to the hosting site Youtube.

Yours Sincerely
McCann Exposure

Tony Bennett
Researcher/Moderator

Posts : 13966
Reputation : 2141
Join date : 2009-11-25
Age : 69
Location : Harlow, Essex

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: McCann Exposure Carter Rucked and now for a second time!

Post by HotlipsHealy on 08.06.11 16:42



How nice that kangdang calls an axe murderer 'Sir' wtf

HotlipsHealy

Posts : 124
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-05-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: McCann Exposure Carter Rucked and now for a second time!

Post by Big Vern on 09.06.11 19:47

@HotlipsHealy wrote:Big Vern, why do you think Mr Bennett felt the need to respond to Carter Ruck about a blog he and the blog owner says he has no connection to.

Because his attention has been drawn to the contents of two letters that have questioned his integrity for a start.

____________________
Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive

Big Vern

Posts : 123
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2010-10-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: McCann Exposure Carter Rucked and now for a second time!

Post by HotlipsHealy on 09.06.11 19:51

It would seem one of my messages has been deleted. Any reason why mods?

HotlipsHealy

Posts : 124
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2011-05-16

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: McCann Exposure Carter Rucked and now for a second time!

Post by Guest on 09.06.11 19:52

It's been moved to the Madeleine Foundation thread, ufercoffy posted the same post in two places and we were getting replies on both making it confusing, so your post has been moved there. thumbsup

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: McCann Exposure Carter Rucked and now for a second time!

Post by Guest on 11.06.11 10:41

Announcement McCann Exposure

10 June 2007

In light of misconceptions being generated by an ill-informed minority, McCann Exposure considers it necessary to issue the following announcement:

McCann Exposure is not owned, co-run or affiliated to The Madeleine Foundation or any of its members. This includes, Mr. Anthony Bennett, Mr. Stephen Marsden, Ms. Sharon Bradford and Ms. Sharon Lawrence.

McCann Exposure is not subject to criminal complaint investigation by Greater Manchester Police or any other police force on behalf of Mr. Brian Kennedy or any other party.

Carter Ruck's communications dated 2nd and 3rd June to Automattic and WordPress are not available for public viewing. It is, therefore, of the utmost importance that people exercise great caution when reading commentary generated elsewhere in relation to this matter.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id232.html

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum