Super injunctions: Carter Ruck: Paedophiles and the McCanns

Page 1 of 6 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Super injunctions: Carter Ruck: Paedophiles and the McCanns

Post  Anon on Mon May 09, 2011 9:59 pm

This evening ,Kate McCann has gone too far ,she has now accused the Portuguese Police force of covering up sex crimes against children, this is a woman who refused to answer questions related to her daughter, refused to return for a reconstruction and fled the country along with her husband the moment they became suspects.

Kate McCann insists her daughter was abducted by a paedophile...OK lets talk paedophile , we have at this very moment one MP ,there could be more, high rank in office ,hiding behind a super injunction for abusing a child...70 allegations against him.

We have on the other hand a witness statement from another Doctor showing great concern for Madeleine McCann and a member of the group Dr.David Payne. The abuse in the British press from this woman today toward a police force that did everything in their power to help find this child has gone beyond the pale, no one could have asked for more and TODAY she has declared no one on the night May 3rd searched for Madeleine...this is a blatant lie and a great insult to the people of Portugal....it is Kate and her husband who did not search, instead telephoned friends in England to lie about a smashed shutter.

It is time the British press stopped pussyfooting around and started doing the job they are paid to do, so I say to you get off your fat British arses and start
printing some truths and F**** Carter f****** Ruck...stop being afraid of the McCanns and grow some balls...this sick game has to stop.

It is my belief the McCanns through their lawyers CARTER RUCK have a super injunction on the GASPAR statement...I ask you please to read the statement in full and see if you agree.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/8500353/Kate-McCann-accuses-Algarve-police-of-sex-abuse-cover-up.html

Kate McCann accuses PJ of a sex cover up.


http://themurdochempireanditsnestofvipers.blogspot.com/2011/05/super-injunction-paedophile-mp-who-is.html
MP : Super Injunction with between him and others 70 convictions against a young child.,

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/19-Sep8/NOTW-14-09-08.htm
The DIARY.

http://steelmagnolia-steelmagnolia.blogspot.com/2011/05/david-jones-reporter-who-betrayed.html.
REPORTER: David Jones when in PDL

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id236.html
THE GASPAR STATEMENT

Last Name: GASPAR
Forenames: KATHERINA ZACHARIAS
Age: +18
Date of Birth:
Address:
Postal Code:
Profession:
Telephone no.:
Date of Testimony: 16/05/2007
Number of Pages: 8

I give this declaration in relation to the McCANN family who are currently in Portugal. The McCANN family is composed of Gerry McCANN, his wife, Kate McCANN and their three children, Madeleine, age 4, and Sean and Amelie, who are twins and 3 years of age.

As is abundantly clear, Madeleine is not with her family presently, and has been missing for the last two weeks.

I will begin by explaining that I am married to Savio Gaspar and that we have two daughters. Ellen is almost 3 and Isabella is now one year old. I have been married to Savior for 11 years. I am a general practitioner as is my husband. I met my husband when we were (page 1) working together in Exeter, around 14 years ago.

In order to explain how we know the McCANN family, I would like to state that my husband knows Kate as both attended Dundee University between 1987 and 1992. At that time, she was Kate HEALY. I met Kate and Gerry at their wedding, in 1998, in Liverpool. Both Savio and I went to the wedding. As Savio was Kate’s friend, we were invited to the event.

From what I know, Savio did not know Gerry before the wedding. After this time, we became friends and about three times we spent weekend vacations together. I would say that we are intimate friends of Gerry and Kate.

I remember that in 2002 or 2003, Savio and I spent the weekend with Gerry and Kate in Devon. We maintained contact with one another via telephone.

In 2002/2003 Savio and I lived Birmingham and the McCANNS in Leciester.

In September of 2005, Savio, myself and Ellena, who at the time was 1 and a half years old, spent our holidays abroad, in Mallorca. We went (page 2) on holidays with Kate, Gerry, and Madeleine, who should have been around 21/2 years old, and the twins, who were only months old. I remember that I was pregnancy with Isabella.

On those holidays we also met Gerry and Kate’s friends.

There was a couple, whose names were Dave and Fiona, and whose family name was PAYNE, I think. I believe that they were married and had one daughter, 1 year old, called Lilly. I remember that on these holidays, Fiona was pregnant.

There was another couple, whose names were Tara and Stuart, and whose family name I cannot remember who were also on holiday with us. They had two boys, 1 and 3 years old, whose names I do not remember. I did not know these two families until the holidays together. As I recall, I think that David organised the holidays and we all stayed together in a big house in Mallorca.

We spend a week on holidays, however, the McCANN family, and the PAYNE family stayed for two weeks. I think that Tara and Stuart, and their two children, also stayed for only one week.

Two or three days passed in Mallorca where we relaxed (Page 3) with our children. Possibly around the fourth or fifth day abroad, I remember an incident that stayed with me. I tell this in this way, and afterwards I have thought many times about the incident that I am about to describe.
One night, on holidays, the adults—the couple aforementioned—were on a patio on the side of the house were we lodged. We had been eating and drinking.

I was seated between David and Gerry who were both speaking about Madeleine. I don’t remember the conversation in its entirety, but id did appear they were discussing a possible scenario. I remember David telling Gerry something like “she” (referring to Madeleine) “would she do this”.

Upon mentioning “this”, David was sucking on one of his fingers, pushing it inside and outside his mouth, and with the other hand encircled his breast in a gyrating fashion over his shirt. This was done in a provocative manner and carried an explicit insinuation in relation to what he was doing.

I remember that I was shocked at this, and looked at Gerry, and also at Dave, to gauge their reactions. I looked around (page 4) as is saying “did someone else hear that, or was it just me”. Silence registered in all the conversations and after, we all began conversing again.
I never spoke to anyone about this, but always felt that it was very strange and not something that should be discussed or said.

Besides this, I remember that David once again did the same thing. When I refer to this, I want to clarify that it was during a conversation in which he was talking about an imaginary situation. I do not know of what. I believe that he was talking about his own daughter, Lily, although I cannot be certain. He put one of his fingers in his mouth and slide it in and out, and with the other hand, drew a circle around his breast in a sexually provocative way. I believe that he was referring to what Lily would do.
I believe that he did this later, during the holidays, but I cannot be sure. The last time, besides this, when I was with David and Fiona was several weeks after the holidays, when Savio and I were at a restaurant with Gerry, Kate, Dave and Fiona.

I am certain that he said or that he repeated the same gestures aforementioned, but it could have occurred in a restaurant in Leicester, however (page five) I believe that it was later in Mallorca.When I heard Dave asking is “she did this” a second time, I took it more seriously.
I remember questioning whether looked at my children or the others in a different way. I imagined that he maybe visited Internet sites related to small children. I thought that he may be interested in child pornography on the Internet.During our holidays I was more attentive at bath time after hearing Dave saying this.


During our vacation in Mallorca, it was the fathers who bathed the children. I had the tendency to walk close to the bathroom, if David was bathing his children. I remember telling Savio to be careful when he was there, in case Dave was helping bathe the children and, in particular, my daughter Ellena. I was very clear about this, as having heard him disturbed me, and did not trust him bathing Ellena alone.
When I heard Dave say that a second time, this reinforced what I already though in relation to his thoughts about little girls.During our stay in Mallorca, Dave and his wife, Fiona, accompanied by this daughter Lilly, took Madeleine (page 6) with them to sped the day together, and to give Kate and Gerry a bit of rest with the twins. At stating this, it is not that I was reoccupied with Madeleine’s safety, as she was also with Fiona and Lilly, along with Dave.

As already referred to, I was only with Dave and Fiona on one occasion, after Mallorca. And I have not spoken to them since this time. In these last years, we have seen eachother, along with the McCANNS, on occasion. These occasions coincide with the children’s birthdays—a time when we get together.

The first time I hear the terrible news regarding the disappearance of Madeleine from the radio, my thoughts went immediately to Dave. I asked Savio if Dave was also on holidays with the McCANNs in Portugal but he did not know.

I watched TV to catch the overage of the notices and found that Dave was there. I saw him on television in the first days after the disappearance. At that, I believed that he was on holidays with the McCANNs in Portugal. Today, Thursday, the 16th of May, 2007, at 15H40, I gave DC Brewer a page containing 2 photographic images. I am going to reference these images as (ref KZG/1) (probably element) that may (page seven) be presented with my approval, if necessary. These photographs were taken during out holidays in Mallorca. In the photographs, Dave is wearing a white t-shirt and the woman in the photograph is his wife Fiona. The man that is holding the cup of wine in the photograph is Stuart. These photographs were taken whilst we were in Mallorca.

Signed:


---------------------------------------------------------
Volume XIII TOC, pgs. 3892 to 3601


http://themurdochempireanditsnestofvipers.blogspot.com/2011/05/super-injunctions-carter-ruck.html?spref=tw


Last edited by candyfloss on Mon May 09, 2011 10:09 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : To delete swear words)

Anon

Posts: 9
Join date: 2010-10-31

Back to top Go down

Re: Super injunctions: Carter Ruck: Paedophiles and the McCanns

Post  dragonfly on Mon May 09, 2011 10:19 pm

a injunction is different from a super injunction as you state regarding Gasper statement, with a super injunction you would not know the gasper statement exsisted

Also Why on earth would she ever bath her children around someone she suspected of sinister motives, you would not even socialise around someone like that during a holiday , let alone have them around while bathing your children , to say keep an eye, no you would remove yourself from them completely

____________________


dragonfly

Posts: 318
Join date: 2011-03-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Super injunctions: Carter Ruck: Paedophiles and the McCanns

Post  Anon on Mon May 09, 2011 10:22 pm

Maybe she didn't mind a pervert bathing her children.

Anon

Posts: 9
Join date: 2010-10-31

Back to top Go down

Re: Super injunctions: Carter Ruck: Paedophiles and the McCanns

Post  Ringo on Mon May 09, 2011 11:17 pm

Anon wrote:This evening ,Kate McCann has gone too far ,she has now accused the Portuguese Police force of covering up sex crimes against children,

Actually, this is a woman who has written in her book that Bill Henderson of the British Consul informed her that there had been in 2007 in Portugal several cases of strange men getting into bed with children of British holiday makers in holiday apartments One of these children's parents then wrote to Kate to tell her that the police had not properly investigated any of the incidents. Now, if she is lying I'm sure Bill, or the parent or the PJ will come forward with a libel action against her, or at least some sort of rebuttal. Assuming however that she is not lying does this information not concern you in any way?

Ringo

Posts: 265
Join date: 2011-05-09

Back to top Go down

Re: Super injunctions: Carter Ruck: Paedophiles and the McCanns

Post  Get 'em Gonçalo on Mon May 09, 2011 11:28 pm

Ringo wrote:
Anon wrote:This evening ,Kate McCann has gone too far ,she has now accused the Portuguese Police force of covering up sex crimes against children,

Actually, this is a woman who has written in her book that Bill Henderson of the British Consul informed her that there had been in 2007 in Portugal several cases of strange men getting into bed with children of British holiday makers in holiday apartments One of these children's parents then wrote to Kate to tell her that the police had not properly investigated any of the incidents. Now, if she is lying I'm sure Bill, or the parent or the PJ will come forward with a libel action against her, or at least some sort of rebuttal. Assuming however that she is not lying does this information not concern you in any way?

I think you'll find 'Anon' copied and pasted the article from Steelmagnolia's blog, so you could put the question to her
http://themurdochempireanditsnestofvipers.blogspot.com/2011/05/super-injunctions-carter-ruck.html?spref=tw

Get 'em Gonçalo
Forum owner

Posts: 3534
Join date: 2009-11-25

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

Re: Super injunctions: Carter Ruck: Paedophiles and the McCanns

Post  Cheshire Cat on Tue May 10, 2011 7:57 am

Get 'em Gonçalo wrote:
Ringo wrote:
Anon wrote:This evening ,Kate McCann has gone too far ,she has now accused the Portuguese Police force of covering up sex crimes against children,

Actually, this is a woman who has written in her book that Bill Henderson of the British Consul informed her that there had been in 2007 in Portugal several cases of strange men getting into bed with children of British holiday makers in holiday apartments One of these children's parents then wrote to Kate to tell her that the police had not properly investigated any of the incidents. Now, if she is lying I'm sure Bill, or the parent or the PJ will come forward with a libel action against her, or at least some sort of rebuttal. Assuming however that she is not lying does this information not concern you in any way?

I think you'll find 'Anon' copied and pasted the article from Steelmagnolia's blog, so you could put the question to her
[url=http://themurdochempireanditsnestofvipers.blogspot.com/2011/05/super-injunctions-carter-ruck.html?spref=tw
http://themurdochempireanditsnestofvipers.blogspot.com/2011/05/super-injunctions-carter-ruck.html?spref=tw[/quote[/url]]

I think K.Gaspar is a very brave lady. She would have walked into that police station with her heart pounding but would have thought the information she supplied would have been acted on without delay. She was let down. How do you think she feels when she reads the diary extracts? K.Gaspar is another victim who is probably terrified to make any further comment.

Cheshire Cat
Madeleine Foundation

Posts: 639
Join date: 2010-08-16

Back to top Go down

Super injunctions etc

Post  Marian on Tue May 10, 2011 9:30 am

I agree with Dragonfly at 9.19 yesterday regarding the Gaspars not removing themselves and their children entirely from someone whose behaviour they felt was very suspect. I find it hard to take their statement seriously as a result of this.

Marian

Posts: 1071
Join date: 2010-12-19
Location: England

Back to top Go down

Re: Super injunctions: Carter Ruck: Paedophiles and the McCanns

Post  Ringo on Tue May 10, 2011 9:46 am

Get 'em Gonçalo wrote:
Ringo wrote:
Anon wrote:This evening ,Kate McCann has gone too far ,she has now accused the Portuguese Police force of covering up sex crimes against children,

Actually, this is a woman who has written in her book that Bill Henderson of the British Consul informed her that there had been in 2007 in Portugal several cases of strange men getting into bed with children of British holiday makers in holiday apartments One of these children's parents then wrote to Kate to tell her that the police had not properly investigated any of the incidents. Now, if she is lying I'm sure Bill, or the parent or the PJ will come forward with a libel action against her, or at least some sort of rebuttal. Assuming however that she is not lying does this information not concern you in any way?

I think you'll find 'Anon' copied and pasted the article from Steelmagnolia's blog, so you could put the question to her
[url=http://themurdochempireanditsnestofvipers.blogspot.com/2011/05/super-injunctions-carter-ruck.html?spref=tw
http://themurdochempireanditsnestofvipers.blogspot.com/2011/05/super-injunctions-carter-ruck.html?spref=tw[/quote[/url]]

OK, thanks - in the meantime what do others who post here (and who may agree with what was written in the OP) make of the revelations concerning sex attacks on British children in the Algarve in the year Madeleine went missing and the apparent subsequent lack of police investigation? Completely irrelevant to the McCann case?

Ringo

Posts: 265
Join date: 2011-05-09

Back to top Go down

Re: Super injunctions: Carter Ruck: Paedophiles and the McCanns

Post  candyfloss on Tue May 10, 2011 9:58 am

Ringo wrote:
Get 'em Gonçalo wrote:
Ringo wrote:
Anon wrote:This evening ,Kate McCann has gone too far ,she has now accused the Portuguese Police force of covering up sex crimes against children,

Actually, this is a woman who has written in her book that Bill Henderson of the British Consul informed her that there had been in 2007 in Portugal several cases of strange men getting into bed with children of British holiday makers in holiday apartments One of these children's parents then wrote to Kate to tell her that the police had not properly investigated any of the incidents. Now, if she is lying I'm sure Bill, or the parent or the PJ will come forward with a libel action against her, or at least some sort of rebuttal. Assuming however that she is not lying does this information not concern you in any way?

I think you'll find 'Anon' copied and pasted the article from Steelmagnolia's blog, so you could put the question to her
[url=http://themurdochempireanditsnestofvipers.blogspot.com/2011/05/super-injunctions-carter-ruck.html?spref=tw
http://themurdochempireanditsnestofvipers.blogspot.com/2011/05/super-injunctions-carter-ruck.html?spref=tw[/quote[/url]]

OK, thanks - in the meantime what do others who post here (and who may agree with what was written in the OP) make of the revelations concerning sex attacks on British children in the Algarve in the year Madeleine went missing and the apparent subsequent lack of police investigation? Completely irrelevant to the McCann case?


According to the Telegraph, in was in the 3 years prior to Madeleine going missing, this is what they published from Kate's book....

In 2008, when the Portuguese police officially stopped pursuing the case, their files revealed that in the three years preceding Madeleine’s disappearance, three intruders had been disturbed in children’s bedrooms within an hour’s drive of Praia de Luz and five children had been abused in their beds while on holiday in the Algarve. Evidence had not been collected, let alone collated or publicised.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/madeleinemccann/8503610/Kate-McCann-why-didnt-they-believe-her.html

____________________



candyfloss

Posts: 14023
Join date: 2009-11-27
Age: 61

Back to top Go down

Re: Super injunctions: Carter Ruck: Paedophiles and the McCanns

Post  Ringo on Tue May 10, 2011 10:41 am

OK, I stand corrected, thanks.

So these attacks occurred in 2004, 2005, and 2006 where British children were attacked in their beds in their holiday apartments in the Algarve and the cases were not investigated properly or publicised. Any thoughts about this - do you see any relevance at all with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann from her holiday apartment in 2007? I mean, if you were a private investigator coming to the Madeleine case with a completely open mind would you dismiss this information out of hand or would you think that there might be a link and investigate this line of enquiry further?

Ringo

Posts: 265
Join date: 2011-05-09

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 6 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum