The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

mccanns -v- amaral - next chapter

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: mccanns -v- amaral - next chapter

Post by marigold on 27.12.09 21:35

I go along with Amaral. I think she died late afternoon/early evening on 3rd May.

marigold

Posts : 234
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2009-12-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: mccanns -v- amaral - next chapter

Post by Bea_Reasonable on 27.12.09 21:49

Nothing about Amaral makes you feel uneasy?

Honestly?

Nothing?

Bea_Reasonable

Posts : 126
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2009-12-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: mccanns -v- amaral - next chapter

Post by marigold on 27.12.09 21:52

@Bea_Reasonable wrote:Nothing about Amaral makes you feel uneasy?

Honestly?

Nothing?

Absolutely nothing. Tell me, nothing about the Mccanns makes you feel uneasy, nothing?

marigold

Posts : 234
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2009-12-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: mccanns -v- amaral - next chapter

Post by Bea_Reasonable on 27.12.09 21:53

Leaving their children, absolutely does yes.

How about Amaral, his conviction for brutality? he never found her, never even came close?His book? The jag? Makes you feel good about him?

Bea_Reasonable

Posts : 126
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2009-12-15

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: mccanns -v- amaral - next chapter

Post by Guest on 27.12.09 21:55

Ok Autumn. Thanks for your response. So you believe the 'neglect issue' is the cause of Madelene's demise?
Had the parents checked more frequently, you believe the child would not be 'missing'?

Could you explain the dates? Thanks.

I wonder if also you could also explain how you think the McCanns, would carry on as usual (as per Twinkles post) yet you find it difficult to believe they harmed her deliberately.

Sorry if I come across as a bit sarcastic. I assure you I am not. I am genuinely interested. Right now I am on the fence with one leg in the 'anti' garden. That is more as a result of some of the over zealous 'pro' opinion than much else if truth be told.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: mccanns -v- amaral - next chapter

Post by marigold on 28.12.09 1:16

@Bea_Reasonable wrote:Leaving their children, absolutely does yes.

How about Amaral, his conviction for brutality? he never found her, never even came close?His book? The jag? Makes you feel good about him?

Of course he didn't come close to finding her, he was blocked by all and sundry. Dodgy FFS results, refused Mccann credit card details, refused Mccann financial details, coerced into accepting the abduction theory at first, Mccanns and Tapas refusing to do a reconstruction etc etc. He wasn't the only policeman that thought Maddie was dead and the Mccanns were involved. Other Portugese police and certain British police also arrived at that conclusion. As for his Jag, so what? It's a second hand car, not new, what's the big deal here?
His book? Can't be erased unlike internet pages so the truth is there in print for anyone to see. FANTASTIC.
Now.. How about the Mccanns? What makes you feel good about them? The fund.. they are directors and can do what they like with public money? Their behaviour? Laughing, swimming, jogging, sleeping well a few days after they said their child was with a paedophile? Trademarking their daughter? Charging for posters? Leaving their children alone night after night? Does all this make you feel all warm inside?

marigold

Posts : 234
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2009-12-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: mccanns -v- amaral - next chapter

Post by Autumn on 28.12.09 1:28

Cherub wrote:Ok Autumn. Thanks for your response. So you believe the 'neglect issue' is the cause of Madelene's demise?
Had the parents checked more frequently, you believe the child would not be 'missing'?

Could you explain the dates? Thanks.

I wonder if also you could also explain how you think the McCanns, would carry on as usual (as per Twinkles post) yet you find it difficult to believe they harmed her deliberately.

Sorry if I come across as a bit sarcastic. I assure you I am not. I am genuinely interested. Right now I am on the fence with one leg in the 'anti' garden. That is more as a result of some of the over zealous 'pro' opinion than much else if truth be told.

As there are so many inconsistencies in the statements given by the McCanns and their friends, it is impossible to establish how often they checked their children. The frequency of their checks, if indeed they checked at all, is irrevelent as leaving very young children unattended for any length of time is, imo, totally unacceptable.
If you read the tapas 7 and McCanns' statements, you will see that they all seem to have difficulty recalling what they did, where they went, who they were with etc on 1st May. I thnk the McCanns would have needed time to compose themselves and work out what they would do before staging the 'abduction' on 3rd May. Murat booking his flight at 1.00 am on lst May seems strange to many but maybe he was need in PDL urgently - did he supply a freezer?
I have no idea how the McCanns managed to carry on as if nothing had happened, but there are plenty of pics of them jogging and laughing as if they didn't have a care in the world.

Autumn

Posts : 2603
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: mccanns -v- amaral - next chapter

Post by Autumn on 28.12.09 1:58

Raffle wrote:
@Autumn wrote:
Cherub wrote:Autumn. May I ask; do you think the McCanns harmed their daughter? or do you believe that there was an abductor?

I believe that Madeleine died in apartment 5A around 30th-1st May 2007 - her death was most likely, imo, a result of an accident but nothing can be ruled out. I find it hard to think that the McCanns deliberatly harmed their daughter but that is not to say that Madeleine did not come to harm as a result of their neglectful behaviour. From the outset, I have never believed Madeleine was abducted and nothing I have read about this case since has convinced me otherwise.
from the 30th April until the closing hours of 3rd May, so four days with a dead child in the apartment? And they went out for dinner, played tennis etc etc as if all was well in the world?

Are you sure she even went to PDL?

Well they certainly carried on after 3rd May as if all was well with the world didn't they?

Autumn

Posts : 2603
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2009-11-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum