What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Page 1 of 2 • Share
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Repeated over and over that there was no evidence of an abductor - and keeps getting interleaved in various topics.
Exactly what would the police expect to find?
To start with I posted this on another thread:
1, incomplete and unidentified fingerprints on shutters
2. unidentified hair in the apt
3. a child is missing.
Now consider these items that COULD but were NOT examined immediately
1. the bedding was not sealed and taken for examination
2. there was no full forensic sweep of the apt immediately
Without an immediate full forensic sweep how on earth can you find evidence?
The argument that there was no evidence of an abductor seems to be a nonsense now that we have seen the files.
Exactly what would the police expect to find?
To start with I posted this on another thread:
1, incomplete and unidentified fingerprints on shutters
2. unidentified hair in the apt
3. a child is missing.
Now consider these items that COULD but were NOT examined immediately
1. the bedding was not sealed and taken for examination
2. there was no full forensic sweep of the apt immediately
Without an immediate full forensic sweep how on earth can you find evidence?
The argument that there was no evidence of an abductor seems to be a nonsense now that we have seen the files.
DCB1- Posts : 334
Activity : 365
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2009-12-04
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Well,when we consider how the Flat was forensically examined, its a no brainer. If the abductor had left any traces they would not have been found, or matched.
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
I posted this on the other thread :
It is true there's 6 hairs missing from an envelope? The envelope that contained the hairs they found on her bed?*
CuddleCat nor the blanked were examined as far as I know.
No testing for fingerprints on the bedroom door either.
* I should correct that, on the photo there's 10 markers on the bed, in the envelope were 4 hairs.
No hairs from the bed next to the window?
It is true there's 6 hairs missing from an envelope? The envelope that contained the hairs they found on her bed?*
CuddleCat nor the blanked were examined as far as I know.
No testing for fingerprints on the bedroom door either.
* I should correct that, on the photo there's 10 markers on the bed, in the envelope were 4 hairs.
No hairs from the bed next to the window?
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
DCB1 wrote:Repeated over and over that there was no evidence of an abductor - and keeps getting interleaved in various topics.
Exactly what would the police expect to find?
To start with I posted this on another thread:
1, incomplete and unidentified fingerprints on shutters
2. unidentified hair in the apt
3. a child is missing.
Now consider these items that COULD but were NOT examined immediately
1. the bedding was not sealed and taken for examination
2. there was no full forensic sweep of the apt immediately
Without an immediate full forensic sweep how on earth can you find evidence?
The argument that there was no evidence of an abductor seems to be a nonsense now that we have seen the files.
Even with a full forensic sweep I'm not overly convinced that much of a trace would be found - unless there were body fluids, fingerprints, weapon etc.
Considering the apartment was multi occupancy rental there was very little evidence of human beings taken from it.
Nobody analyses skin cells.
vaguely- Posts : 440
Activity : 428
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2009-12-16
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Sadly when a child is taken for unpleasant purposes it is more likely that identifying forensic evidence is found on the body rather than at the crime scene, wherever that scene is, unless the harm is committed at the scene.
Entering an unlocked apartment or entering using a key, removing a child and leaving again would not leave much trace evidence.
Entering an unlocked apartment or entering using a key, removing a child and leaving again would not leave much trace evidence.
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Hi
I seem to recall some argument that it was difficult for the police to complete the forensics tests required because of the number of people that had been in and out of the apartment before they had arrived there?
Take care
I seem to recall some argument that it was difficult for the police to complete the forensics tests required because of the number of people that had been in and out of the apartment before they had arrived there?
Take care
Finally- Posts : 85
Activity : 75
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2009-11-27
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Finally wrote:Hi
I seem to recall some argument that it was difficult for the police to complete the forensics tests required because of the number of people that had been in and out of the apartment before they had arrived there?
Take care
That shouldn't really affect things so badly, I mean lots of crime scenes are far more messed up, people come to harm outside, in the elements, in crowded streets, public transport etc. This was a holiday apartment with a limited number of people in it, all identifiable and some people who entered, also identifiable.
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Finally wrote:Hi
I seem to recall some argument that it was difficult for the police to complete the forensics tests required because of the number of people that had been in and out of the apartment before they had arrived there?
Take care
Yes, people searching the apartment (including the GNR) might have destroyed fingerprints.
Would it have destroyed other evidence? I doubt that.
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Finally wrote:Hi
I seem to recall some argument that it was difficult for the police to complete the forensics tests required because of the number of people that had been in and out of the apartment before they had arrived there?
Take care
Unfortunately their crime scene was trampled. Never a great start. But you would have the tramplers available to take elimination samples from. I'd have thought footwear seizure would have been a good idea.
I'm at a loss to understand why parents weren't immediately treated (sympathetically) as suspects, and why bedding wasn't immediately bagged.
vaguely- Posts : 440
Activity : 428
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2009-12-16
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Molly wrote:Finally wrote:Hi
I seem to recall some argument that it was difficult for the police to complete the forensics tests required because of the number of people that had been in and out of the apartment before they had arrived there?
Take care
Yes, people searching the apartment (including the GNR) might have destroyed fingerprints.
Would it have destroyed other evidence? I doubt that.
It wouldn't have destroyed evidence, but certainly hairs etc could have been disturbed/moved, and forensic sample could become contaminated. It wouldn't have destroyed anything though.
vaguely- Posts : 440
Activity : 428
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2009-12-16
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
vaguely wrote:Molly wrote:Finally wrote:Hi
I seem to recall some argument that it was difficult for the police to complete the forensics tests required because of the number of people that had been in and out of the apartment before they had arrived there?
Take care
Yes, people searching the apartment (including the GNR) might have destroyed fingerprints.
Would it have destroyed other evidence? I doubt that.
It wouldn't have destroyed evidence, but certainly hairs etc could have been disturbed/moved, and forensic sample could become contaminated. It wouldn't have destroyed anything though.
So in fact they should have searched the bathroom, kitchen, parent's bedroom, living room also to find traces (like hairs) as they could have been moved?
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Do we think Laziness,incompetance or something else?
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
PearlB wrote:Do we think Laziness,incompetance or something else?
Possibly simply lack of experience, in the uk missing person cases are treated in exactly the same way as murder enquiries, that way if the worst happens then no evidence will be lost but this has come through years of experience and learning.
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
tyra wrote:Sadly when a child is taken for unpleasant purposes it is more likely that identifying forensic evidence is found on the body rather than at the crime scene, wherever that scene is, unless the harm is committed at the scene.
Entering an unlocked apartment or entering using a key, removing a child and leaving again would not leave much trace evidence.
But how could an abductor physically remove a child without the child screaming the place down. They can't have drugged her as there was no smell of chloroform in the apartment. K & G as doctors would immediately have known, and mentioned this to the police. They can't have injected her, as she would have screamed, and they can't have given her pills as they would take too long to work. So how did the abductor get her out of the apartment so silently.
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
candyfloss wrote:tyra wrote:Sadly when a child is taken for unpleasant purposes it is more likely that identifying forensic evidence is found on the body rather than at the crime scene, wherever that scene is, unless the harm is committed at the scene.
Entering an unlocked apartment or entering using a key, removing a child and leaving again would not leave much trace evidence.
But how could an abductor physically remove a child without the child screaming the place down. They can't have drugged her as there was no smell of chloroform in the apartment. K & G as doctors would immediately have known, and mentioned this to the police. They can't have injected her, as she would have screamed, and they can't have given her pills as they would take too long to work. So how did the abductor get her out of the apartment so silently.
She was most probably asleep, parents carry their sleeping children from place a to b all the time without any screaming, why would there be screaming?
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Why must we believe the abduction theory. I simply don't believe an abductor entered the apartment and took Madeleine. I just simply do not believe that happened. I might be wrong of course. Why is this the theory that is being so heavily pushed.
MaryB- Posts : 204
Activity : 246
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2009-11-29
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
MaryB wrote:Why must we believe the abduction theory. I simply don't believe an abductor entered the apartment and took Madeleine. I just simply do not believe that happened. I might be wrong of course. Why is this the theory that is being so heavily pushed.
Because it's the one that fits the evidence. if you are going to choose to believe something that does not fit the evidence why stick with parental involvement, I say bring out the aliens!
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Who has said the abductor theory fits the evidence.
MaryB- Posts : 204
Activity : 246
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2009-11-29
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
tyra wrote:MaryB wrote:Why must we believe the abduction theory. I simply don't believe an abductor entered the apartment and took Madeleine. I just simply do not believe that happened. I might be wrong of course. Why is this the theory that is being so heavily pushed.
Because it's the one that fits the evidence. if you are going to choose to believe something that does not fit the evidence why stick with parental involvement, I say bring out the aliens!
I am still waiting for someone to supply the evidence. If you can I will be only to happy to go along with that theory. Please don't say JT's sighting, because that cannot be proved. 2 other people were standing there at the time and didn't see anything, very strange.
On the other hand there is far more evidence for the other scenario, i.e. the dogs, the timelines of the tapas 7, the way abduction was pushed from the very first minute. The stories from the family saying the window was jemmied etc., etc.
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
MaryB wrote:Who has said the abductor theory fits the evidence.
Well what does fit the evidence? Child missing, window left open, man seen carrying a child through streets not identified, unidentified prints in apartment, parental involvement ruled out, what's left?
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
It is the police's job to decide what fits the evidence or indications.
MaryB- Posts : 204
Activity : 246
Likes received : 45
Join date : 2009-11-29
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
Do we just write off the partial fingerprints and the unidentified hair then?
DCB1- Posts : 334
Activity : 365
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2009-12-04
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
MaryB wrote:It is the police's job to decide what fits the evidence or indications.
The question is - did they do their job in collecting ALL available evidence from the crime scene.
It doesn't matter if 10's or 1000's had trampled through the apt - they could eliminate the 10's or the 1000's through samples -cos they knew who was there.
DCB1- Posts : 334
Activity : 365
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2009-12-04
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
DCB1, can you remind me where the hair and unidentified fingerprints were found.?
Guest- Guest
Re: What evidence of an abductor would you expect?
tyra wrote:MaryB wrote:Who has said the abductor theory fits the evidence.
Well what does fit the evidence? Child missing, window left open, man seen carrying a child through streets not identified, unidentified prints in apartment, parental involvement ruled out, what's left?
Parental involvement has NOT been ruled out. The conclusion was that it was inconclusive! What actual EVIDENCE points to an abduction other than one of their friends saying they saw a man walking away with a child? JW didn't even see Jane Tanner and said it would have been impossible NOT to see her if she passed by when she said she did! The only independent witnesses saw a man that some of the group said was Gerry, walking with a child. The window, if opened at all, was opened by Kate Mccann herself as her fingerprints showed.
Parental involvement is, statistically, far, far,more likely than stranger abduction. Their weird comments and behaviour is also a pointer and we also have the dogs. Therefore, parental involvement is a far more likely scenario and NOTHING HAS BEEN RULED OUT and that includes the Mccanns and/or friends being involved.
marigold- Posts : 234
Activity : 233
Likes received : 1
Join date : 2009-12-07
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Did they expect me to confess to a crime they had made up
» Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be
» "We want to know what happened to Suzy Lamplugh and Madeleine McCann because, as humans, we're hard-wired to expect answers."
» Some musings on the programme.
» 11 Dec 2009 The McCanns v Goncalo Amaral - Part 2 (YouTube)
» Christian Brueckner: To be or not to be
» "We want to know what happened to Suzy Lamplugh and Madeleine McCann because, as humans, we're hard-wired to expect answers."
» Some musings on the programme.
» 11 Dec 2009 The McCanns v Goncalo Amaral - Part 2 (YouTube)
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum