Note also, how the QC has switched from his normal Defendant role,to the Prosecution side, whereby the QC denies members of his family working for a defunct"Kids Company"Charity and the protection of G4S good name not to be dragged through the murkiness of the contracts from Government Channels?
Astonishing to think that a QC who has been quaffing wine with the Defendant, can then suddenly vent his spleen against her in a Court of Law,couldn't the defendant, then state the Prosecution had a vested interest in finding against the defendant, due to the knowledge they had gleaned from being in a close association in a legal capacity,when they had both been on the same side as defendants,against G4S, House of Commons select Committees, G4S Contract arrangements,FOI requests by Farah Damji?
- Posts : 1362
Reputation : 516
Join date : 2015-05-07