The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Hi,

A very warm welcome to The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™ forum.

Please log in, or register to view all the forums, then settle in and start chatting with us!

Enjoy your day,

Jill Havern
Forum owner

Let's Not Forget Brenda

Page 2 of 20 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11 ... 20  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by Guest on 18.10.14 20:56

@plebgate wrote:Yeah so says you tcat.   People have minds of their own, nobody can encourage me to do anything I don't want to do.
roses same here agree
thanks plebgate

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by sallypelt on 19.10.14 11:55


sallypelt

Posts : 3296
Reputation : 516
Join date : 2012-11-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by worriedmum on 19.10.14 12:17

Is this accurate reporting?  I thought that the McCanns didn't do twitter and it was some-one else who had handed police the 'dossier' ?

worriedmum

Posts : 1625
Reputation : 246
Join date : 2012-01-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by Guest on 19.10.14 12:35

"Kate McCann and her husband" 
Let's not exclude Gerry McCann.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by sallypelt on 19.10.14 12:47

parapono wrote:
"Kate McCann and her husband" 
Let's not exclude Gerry McCann.
Of course, but that's the caption under Kate McCann's pic. I should have put it in quotation marks.

 soz

sallypelt

Posts : 3296
Reputation : 516
Join date : 2012-11-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by Guest on 19.10.14 12:53

roses sallypelt, don't be sorry.
I just wanted to add Gerry as the article included him.
If true, he lied.. or handed something over without reading it?
Beggars belief... 
All imo
parapono

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by palm tree on 19.10.14 13:32

Mccann and her husband Gerry - 

Things are changing.

IMO

____________________
Fight for Madeleine

palm tree

Posts : 365
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2014-08-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by Guest on 19.10.14 13:36

Further down the piece it also add's.

Last month McCann and her husband Gerry handed police an 80-page dossier containing hundreds of tweets,

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by Guest on 19.10.14 13:51

After recently handing out £55k after being accused of libel, they're going to be 100% certain this is not defamatory.

This means they've either picked this up from Bernard Hogan-Howe or they have their own information confirming the Macanns as the conveyors of the dossier imo.

I think this is pretty damning from the Sunday Times. They certainly seem to want to get another mesaage across to their readers other than the troll aspect. This is how the publicly available part of the article appears to non-subscribers:



Kate McCann handed police a dossier of abusive posts (Adrian Sherratt)

THEY are the modern scourge: cowards who use the anonymity of the internet to viciously abuse people by issuing threats to rape, mutilate or murder.

Chris Grayling, the justice secretary, better known for his tough stance on the European convention on human rights, has turned his fire on so-called trolls, people who use social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook to harass and intimidate victims.

"People are being abused online in the most crude and degrading fashion,” Grayling said last night.“We must send out a clear message: if you troll, you risk being behind bars for two years.”

Many of the victims of these trolls are women, among them the Labour MP Stella Creasy, the TV presenter Judy Finnigan and her daughter Chloe Madeley, and Kate McCann, the mother of missing Madeleine.

Last month McCann and her husband Gerry handed police an 80-page dossier containing hundreds of tweets,"


I, personally, am now convinced the McCanns handed that dossier to police.

Wonder what the police investigation into Brenda's death will make of it?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by PeterMac on 19.10.14 15:18

Handed over an 80 page dossier but did not look at the contents ?
So why then hand it over if you don't know what is in it ?
And who gave it to them, assuming they did not prepare it themselves, which they could not have done since they don't look at Twitter or Facebook . . .
because they said so

Every time they speak they find themselves deeper in the mire.
Perhaps a time for a new thread
List of Things the McCanns have said, which turned out to be True.

On second thoughts, it might be fairly short

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by PeterMac on 19.10.14 15:37

copied from facebook  -    https://www.facebook.com/MadeleineMcCannNewsAsItHappens?ref=bookmarks

Gerry McCann stated on BBC Radio 4 that they had no presence on social media.

Jim Gamble stated that the family did not hand in dossier, neither did they have anything to do with it !

Sky News and Martin Brunt said the dossier was handed in by 'anonymous web users.'

Sir Bernard Hogan Howe said the McCanns handed the dossier in.

So do you believe a disgraced and sacked senior Police Officer, or a disgraced reporter, or the main suspect
or the Head of the Met, who seems to be the only one not yet disgraced and sacked ?

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by tigger on 19.10.14 17:06

thinking Gosh! That needs some thought....

Got it! Can't have been the McCanns because they're spending all their time and money on 'the search' - couldn't possibly spend money on people gathering information on what's being said about them.

Which reminds me of the Swedish interviewer who asked what would be their reaction if Maddie was found to be dead.
Kate answered that the worst would be that there would be no more search.

Iirc it was the second interview.

____________________
Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate.

tigger

Posts : 8112
Reputation : 24
Join date : 2011-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by HelenMeg on 19.10.14 17:27

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/oct/02/abuse-dossier-kate-gerry-mccann-police-madeleine

Guardian reports :

A dossier of online abuse directed at the parents of Madeleine McCann is being examined by police.
Members of the public have handed to Scotland Yard a file stretching to more than 80 pages of tweets, Facebook posts and forum messages aimed at Kate and Gerry McCann, according to Sky News.


http://news.sky.com/story/1346687/gerry-mccann-says-make-example-of-web-trolls
Gerry McCann said online abuse had caused "severe distress" to him and his wife Kate and that police should be more willing to prosecute the perpetrators.
He was speaking after Sky's Crime Correspondent Martin Brunt revealed in a special report that Scotland Yard is investigating a dossier of social media abuse targeting the McCanns - whose three-year-old daughter went missing on a family holiday in 2007.
When confronted over her actions, one of the trolls, who used the name "Sweepyface" online, told Sky News she believed she was "entitled" to attack the couple on Twitter.
Mr McCann said he had not read the Sweepyface tweets, but he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Clearly something needs to be done about the abuse on the internet. I think we probably need more people to be charged.

Mr McCann also branded the Sunday Times "disgraceful" after winning a £55,000 libel payout over a story which claimed the couple had deliberately hindered the search for Madeleine, who vanished in Praia da Luz.


Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Sky news + Sunday Times - major game playing going on.  Gerry says he did not read the Sweepyface tweets yet he, says Hogan-Howe and ST, was responsible (with his family ) for handing over dossier to OG - as usual - some lies are being told, it would seem, IMO. Confusion.

1. Guardian report incorrect as it says members of the public handed over dossier. Who fed it that line?
2. The Bernard Hogan Howe states it was family that gave dossier to SY.
3. Now ST is reinforcing that family handed it over - in fact they make it very clear - almost as if they wrote the piece in order to make it clear!

Now think back that Martin Brunt did a special Sky report to investigate the dossier - so who is in cahoots with whom? Team Mc Cann + Martin Brunt (Sky) . Then it backfires with the awful tragedy of teh death of Brenda. The Sunday Times makes it clear that the family handed over the dossier. So does that seem like an about turn by someone?

HelenMeg

Posts : 1782
Reputation : 192
Join date : 2014-01-08

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by Guest on 19.10.14 17:46

HelenMeg, that's the way I see it. But it's Murdoch versus Murdoch here, baffling.

The Sunday Times have always stood out as a lone alternative Murdoch voice, with the 'withheld evidence' report last October, the non-apology which clarfied a minor detail but still stood by the bulk of it's message. Then the paltry (out of court?) settlement in penance for the bit they did have to clarify - peanuts in the scale of 'serious' libel payouts.

And now this. I agree completely that that piece has been written with the specific purpose of clarifying that the McCanns are responsible for passing the dossier to the Met.

So what's going on? Are the ST working autominously from their owner? Or is Murdoch hedging his bets?

Or did Sky encourage the Mcs involvement knowing it would implicate them in the long run? I still can't help thinking Rebekah Brooks had motives other than paper sales when she forced the review.

Just my musings, as ever.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by aiyoyo on 19.10.14 17:54

@PeterMac wrote:copied from facebook  -    https://www.facebook.com/MadeleineMcCannNewsAsItHappens?ref=bookmarks

Gerry McCann stated on BBC Radio 4 that they had no presence on social media.

Jim Gamble stated that the family did not hand in dossier, neither did they have anything to do with it !

Sky News and Martin Brunt said the dossier was handed in by 'anonymous web users.'

Sir Bernard Hogan Howe said the McCanns handed the dossier in.

So do you believe a disgraced and sacked senior Police Officer, or a disgraced reporter, or the main suspect
or the Head of the Met, who seems to be the only one not yet disgraced and sacked ?


I know who I believe.  

It is the action of someone with an interest to protect.  It is inconceivable that a total stranger unrelated or unassociated to the McCanns, no matter how nosey, would become so personal and emotive over the McCanns, that s/he would bend her/her arms to do something petty like that for no apparent purpose.

I don't buy this anonymous snitcher croak.  

If not the McCanns, are they going to sue the author of this article, or sue BHH ?

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by aiyoyo on 19.10.14 17:56

@tigger wrote:thinking    Gosh! That needs some thought....  

Got it!  Can't have been the McCanns because they're spending all their time and money  on 'the search' - couldn't possibly spend money on people gathering information on what's being said about them.

Which reminds me of the Swedish interviewer who asked what would be their reaction if Maddie was found to be dead.
Kate answered that the worst would be that there would be no more search.

Iirc it was the second interview.

Not "no more Madeleine" but "no more search"....it's one of those WTF moments of their narratives !

They want the search to go on forever, if possible, for obvious reason.

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by lj on 20.10.14 1:20

@HelenMeg wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/oct/02/abuse-dossier-kate-gerry-mccann-police-madeleine

Guardian reports :

A dossier of online abuse directed at the parents of Madeleine McCann is being examined by police.
Members of the public have handed to Scotland Yard a file stretching to more than 80 pages of tweets, Facebook posts and forum messages aimed at Kate and Gerry McCann, according to Sky News.


http://news.sky.com/story/1346687/gerry-mccann-says-make-example-of-web-trolls
Gerry McCann said online abuse had caused "severe distress" to him and his wife Kate and that police should be more willing to prosecute the perpetrators.
He was speaking after Sky's Crime Correspondent Martin Brunt revealed in a special report that Scotland Yard is investigating a dossier of social media abuse targeting the McCanns - whose three-year-old daughter went missing on a family holiday in 2007.
When confronted over her actions, one of the trolls, who used the name "Sweepyface" online, told Sky News she believed she was "entitled" to attack the couple on Twitter.
Mr McCann said he had not read the Sweepyface tweets, but he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "Clearly something needs to be done about the abuse on the internet. I think we probably need more people to be charged.

Mr McCann also branded the Sunday Times "disgraceful" after winning a £55,000 libel payout over a story which claimed the couple had deliberately hindered the search for Madeleine, who vanished in Praia da Luz.


Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Sky news + Sunday Times - major game playing going on.  Gerry says he did not read the Sweepyface tweets yet he, says Hogan-Howe and ST, was responsible (with his family ) for handing over dossier to OG - as usual - some lies are being told, it would seem, IMO. Confusion.

1. Guardian report incorrect as it says members of the public handed over dossier. Who fed it that line?
2. The Bernard Hogan Howe states it was family that gave dossier to SY.
3. Now ST is reinforcing that family handed it over - in fact they make it very clear - almost as if they wrote the piece in order to make it clear!

Now think back that Martin Brunt did a special Sky report to investigate the dossier - so who is in cahoots with whom? Team Mc Cann + Martin Brunt (Sky) . Then it backfires with the awful tragedy of teh death of Brenda. The Sunday Times makes it clear that the family handed over the dossier. So does that seem like an about turn by someone?
How could it  cause "severe distress" to him and his wife Kate if they had not read it?

____________________
"And if Madeleine had hurt herself inside the apartment, why would that be our fault?"  Gerry

http://pjga.blogspot.co.uk/?m=0

http://whatreallyhappenedtomadeleinemccann.blogspot.co.uk/

lj

Posts : 3274
Reputation : 148
Join date : 2009-12-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by Okeydokey on 20.10.14 2:34

@PeterMac wrote:copied from facebook  -    https://www.facebook.com/MadeleineMcCannNewsAsItHappens?ref=bookmarks

Gerry McCann stated on BBC Radio 4 that they had no presence on social media.

Jim Gamble stated that the family did not hand in dossier, neither did they have anything to do with it !

Sky News and Martin Brunt said the dossier was handed in by 'anonymous web users.'

Sir Bernard Hogan Howe said the McCanns handed the dossier in.

So do you believe a disgraced and sacked senior Police Officer, or a disgraced reporter, or the main suspect
or the Head of the Met, who seems to be the only one not yet disgraced and sacked ?

Let's hope the Inquest gets to the bottom of this since it is germane to how poor Brenda died. Did she die as a result of a co-ordinated campaign or as a reaction to mere happenstance.

I think we can see which way the evidence is pointing.

Okeydokey

Posts : 919
Reputation : 13
Join date : 2013-10-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by aiyoyo on 20.10.14 6:59

Let's hope the Inquest summons Brunt to ask questions :
How he heard about the dossier?
Had he seen the dossier personally and who supplied it to him?
Why he particularly singled out Brenda?
Was he instructed to target her?

The way the dossier was compiled is probably a criminal offence.
It wasn't just a compilation of tweets per se by a disgruntle public member. Tweeter user's identity (and personal detail) is not a regular feature on tweeter account it is usually just a screen name.

The fact that the dossier contains tweeter users personal details meant the compiler had gone beyond that. Questions have to be asked how the compiler obtained those personal details? How many users were targeted, and why particularly Brenda was singled out for the Press?
It meant the compiler was a stalker of targeted tweeter users, must have googled researched and dug around in order to come up with a personalised dossier.

Pertinent questions would be : Who was the compiler? Why did s/he stalk, target and single out only Mccans doubters ? What was in it for the compiler? Why did compiler get personal with Mccanns doubters going the extra miles to compile not only a dossier of tweets but a dossier of users' profiles if there is no vested interest in it for the compiler?

It is patently clear the compiler must be one of these two types (1) a complete nutter who is a blind fan of McCanns or (2) someone related /connected to the McCanns.

Was the compiler and snitcher (to Police and Press) same person or two different people? If different entities, what's the connection between compiler and snitcher. More importantly the inquest needs to determine if the Mcs was behind the stalking and outing of their doubters.

We can guess to whose doorstep this will lead to, but at the end of day it is up to Brenda's family to demand this thoroughness from the Inquest otherwise Brunt and the so called anonymous snitcher are going to get off without repercussions. It's probably going to be swept under the carpet as everything related to the Mcs invariably is.

aiyoyo

Posts : 9611
Reputation : 318
Join date : 2009-11-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by PeterMac on 20.10.14 8:51

@aiyoyo wrote:
@tigger wrote:
Which reminds me of the Swedish interviewer who asked what would be their reaction if Maddie was found to be dead.
Kate answered that the worst would be that there would be no more search.
Iirc it was the second interview.
Not "no more Madeleine" but "no more search"....it's one of those WTF moments of their narratives !
They want the search to go on forever, if possible, for obvious reason.

And didn't Gerry say that they needed the Fund to carry on after the "official search" ended, or words to that effect.
They Knew and Know (or hope !! ) that she will not be found.

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by Guest on 20.10.14 9:05

@PeterMac wrote:
@aiyoyo wrote:
@tigger wrote:
Which reminds me of the Swedish interviewer who asked what would be their reaction if Maddie was found to be dead.
Kate answered that the worst would be that there would be no more search.
Iirc it was the second interview.
Not "no more Madeleine" but "no more search"....it's one of those WTF moments of their narratives !
They want the search to go on forever, if possible, for obvious reason.

And didn't Gerry say that they needed the Fund to carry on after the "official search" ended, or words to that effect.
They Knew and Know (or hope !! ) that she will not be found.
Is that what this case is totally reliant on in the end,a body? how does the law work in Portugal with out a body? any one know?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by PeterMac on 20.10.14 10:04

WMD wrote:
Is that what this case is totally reliant on in the end, a body? how does the law work in Portugal with out a body? any one know?
No, because the Cipriano case went ahead despite the daughter's body not having been found
It makes things more difficult, but not impossible, given the rest of the evidence

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by Monty Heck on 20.10.14 10:11

@worriedmum wrote:
Is this accurate reporting?  I thought that the McCanns didn't do twitter and it was some-one else who had handed police the 'dossier' ?
This at least makes sense.  Random individual/s taking it on themselves to compile a "dossier" including personal information and contact details and not only handing in to the police but the media simply doesn't seem credible.  As for approaching the media with this without the knowledge or sanction of the objects of one's concern when this could be highly damaging, words fail.

Monty Heck

Posts : 470
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2012-09-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda

Post by Guest on 20.10.14 11:36

@PeterMac wrote:
WMD wrote:
Is that what this case is totally reliant on in the end, a body? how does the law work in Portugal with out a body? any one know?
No, because the Cipriano case went ahead despite the daughter's body not having been found
It makes things more difficult, but not impossible, given the rest of the evidence
Thanks for that Peter.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Inquest.

Post by PeterMac on 20.10.14 14:43

RIP Brenda,
Just the latest victim of the McCanns and their Media Machine
There will be more

" />

____________________


PeterMac
Researcher

Posts : 10170
Reputation : 143
Join date : 2010-12-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 20 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 11 ... 20  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum