The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Mm11

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Regist10
The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann™
Welcome to 'The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann' forum 🌹

Please log in, or register to view all the forums as some of them are 'members only', then settle in and help us get to the truth about what really happened to Madeleine Beth McCann.

When you register please do NOT use your email address for a username because everyone will be able to see it!

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Mm11

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Regist10

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Empty Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question

Post by haroldd2 11.10.14 14:56

Publicly-owned Channel Four have published an article saying that a "McCann internet 'troll-hunting' site" was deleted after Brenda Leyland's death.

They say "supporters of the McCann family have assembled at least 27 dossiers" (that word!) "on both anonymous 'trolls' and on those who are perceived to be 'anti-McCann'."

It's this next sentence which gets me:

"There is no indication at all of the McCanns being involved in or endorsing this activity themselves."

Well how about asking them? Haven't Channel Four got anyone who can call up Clarence Mitchell and ask him? Have they had anything to do with it, or haven't they?

Ask them to

a) confirm
b) deny or
c) say they will neither confirm nor deny,

and then report what they say! Do the editors at Channel Four call themselves journalists?
avatar
haroldd2

Posts : 159
Activity : 274
Likes received : 79
Join date : 2014-01-29

Back to top Go down

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Empty Re: Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question

Post by Lance De Boils 11.10.14 15:57

Hogan-Howe said 'the family' handed in the 'dossier', didn't he?
Lance De Boils
Lance De Boils

Posts : 988
Activity : 1053
Likes received : 25
Join date : 2011-12-06

Back to top Go down

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Empty Re: Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question

Post by .Guest.. 11.10.14 16:02

Lance De Boils wrote:Hogan-Howe said 'the family' handed in the 'dossier', didn't he?

Old brain leak himself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6c1aRUUPgE
avatar
.Guest..

Posts : 132
Activity : 160
Likes received : 0
Join date : 2014-09-11

Back to top Go down

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Empty Re: Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question

Post by Guest 11.10.14 16:29

Lance De Boils wrote:Hogan-Howe said 'the family' handed in the 'dossier', didn't he?

Yes he did.

So it's reasonable to assume they were involved.

But yes, why doesn't someone ask.

What if someone with a camera went to their doorstep and asked them? What would happen?
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Empty Re: Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question

Post by tiny 11.10.14 16:39

BlueBag wrote:
Lance De Boils wrote:Hogan-Howe said 'the family' handed in the 'dossier', didn't he?

Yes he did.

So it's reasonable to assume they were involved.

But yes, why doesn't someone ask.

What if someone with a camera went to their doorstep and asked them? What would happen?
you would get done for harassment.and proberly sued by the mccanns
tiny
tiny

Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03

Back to top Go down

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Empty Re: Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question

Post by Guest 11.10.14 16:41

tiny wrote:
BlueBag wrote:
Lance De Boils wrote:Hogan-Howe said 'the family' handed in the 'dossier', didn't he?

Yes he did.

So it's reasonable to assume they were involved.

But yes, why doesn't someone ask.

What if someone with a camera went to their doorstep and asked them? What would happen?
you would get done for harassment.and proberly sued by the mccanns

But Martin Brunt has no more right to do it than us?

Or we have as much right as he does?
Anonymous
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Empty Re: Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question

Post by tiny 11.10.14 16:42

BlueBag wrote:
tiny wrote:
BlueBag wrote:
Lance De Boils wrote:Hogan-Howe said 'the family' handed in the 'dossier', didn't he?

Yes he did.

So it's reasonable to assume they were involved.

But yes, why doesn't someone ask.

What if someone with a camera went to their doorstep and asked them? What would happen?
you would get done for harassment.and proberly sued by the mccanns

But Martin Brunt has no more right to do it than us?

Or we have as much right as he does?
I know he doesn't  that's why I am waiting to see what happens to him
tiny
tiny

Posts : 2274
Activity : 2311
Likes received : 4
Join date : 2010-02-03

Back to top Go down

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Empty Re: Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question

Post by puzzled 11.10.14 16:56

haroldd2 wrote:
They say "supporters of the McCann family have assembled at least 27 dossiers" (that word!) "on both anonymous 'trolls' and on those who are perceived to be 'anti-McCann'."

Why are they assembling dossiers on people perceived to be "anti-McCann"? Has this suddenly become a crime? If not, what do they hope to achieve with these dossiers?

____________________
...how did you feel the last time you squashed a bug? -psychopathic criminal, quoted in Robert Hare, Without Conscience
avatar
puzzled

Posts : 207
Activity : 239
Likes received : 26
Join date : 2011-06-21

Back to top Go down

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Empty Re: Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question

Post by plebgate 11.10.14 17:24

puzzled wrote:
haroldd2 wrote:
They say "supporters of the McCann family have assembled at least 27 dossiers" (that word!) "on both anonymous 'trolls' and on those who are perceived to be 'anti-McCann'."

Why are they assembling dossiers on people perceived to be "anti-McCann"? Has this suddenly become a crime? If not, what do they hope to achieve with these dossiers?
Maybe they would be better off assembling dossiers on people who want to know why those children were left alone several nights running in a foreign land, in a foreign apartment whilst the parents went out with their friends wining and dining?  Heck, didn't one child even have a diarrhoea soaked nappy with a foul smell coming from it.    IMO we are right to question why these parents left those poor, ill children alone.
avatar
plebgate

Posts : 6729
Activity : 8938
Likes received : 2123
Join date : 2013-02-01

Back to top Go down

Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question Empty Re: Channel 4 chicken out from asking McCanns an obvious question

Post by comperedna 11.10.14 17:54

It is only CLAIMED that the children were left alone. It may well be that they were all together, being looked after by one of the friends, or a nanny, or someone else, when 'it' happened. Perhaps Madeleine was sick and aspirated on her vomit. Then you have to wonder, with this scenario, what happened next? Surely one of the doctor friends would try and revive her. The only excuse for others not saying what happened under this entirely hypothetical theory would be that everyone knew each child had been given something mild, but NOT recommended by orthodox medics, 'to help them sleep'.

Leaving the children alone and all that bizarre and inconvenient dodging back in the middle of their meal to see if the McCann children (NB no-one seemed to be interested in the other children when dodging back) were OK ,then becomes a strategy to attempt to prove the parents were not negligent, whilst still creating a window of opportunity for some stranger to enter the flat (no evidence of this whatsoever) to 'steal Madeleine away' for purposes unknown.

This is a well worn theory, accepted, at least for a time, and maybe still, by Amaral. It makes sense to me, but it is only a theory, as is everything about this case until there is solid evidence as to what happened. MBM's death then becomes somewhere between accidental death, or manslaughter/culpable homicide, and not 'murder' as recently 'leaked' by Head of the Met Bernard Hogan-Howe.
avatar
comperedna

Posts : 709
Activity : 781
Likes received : 56
Join date : 2012-10-29

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum